Influence of a cavity on the dynamical behaviour of an airfoil

A new wing design has been the subject of study in the European project VortexCell2050. For several reasons (structural and fuel load) it is desirable to use relatively thick wings. However, thick wings promote flow separation and/or massive vortex shedding, reducing flight performance. The new design airfoil is equipped with a cavity ("vortex cell") in the wing in order to prevent massive flow separation. This thesis aims to obtain insight into the dynamical behaviour of such a wing with a cavity and to explore which numerical methods are suitable for estimating the unsteady forces. In this thesis experiments and computations are presented, using a geometry that was inspired by cavity shapes which are considered in the VortexCell2050 project. For an airfoil with a cavity, oscillations of the shear layer are expected at Strouhal numbers of order unity, based on the width of the cavity opening. For the size of the cavities considered this implies high values, O(10), of the reduced frequency, based on the chord length of the airfoil. In order to conduct experiments in this high reduced frequency range, a new experimental method has been developed. In this experimental setup the airfoil is fixed to the wind tunnel wall and the first acoustic transversal eigenmode of the wind tunnel test section is used to drive an oscillating flow. In the conventional method the airfoil is oscillating. The main fundamental difference between the two methods is the presence of a time dependent uniform pressure gradient, which drives the oscillating flow, in the new method. The results obtained with both methods are equivalent after correcting for an effective buoyancy force induced by this driving pressure gradient. The new method avoids the use of a complex mechanical system to drive the oscillation of the airfoil. The acoustical forcing amplitude is very easy to vary within two orders of magnitude. The method appears to be most suitable for the conduction of experiments at high values of the reduced frequency. The new measurement method is validated by means of experiments on a standard NACA0018 airfoil complemented with two-dimensional Euler simulations. Thereafter two airfoils with slightly different cavity geometries are investigated in the wind tunnel. These experiments consist of measurements of local surface pressures. For the case of an airfoil with a cavity the Euler equations are not suitable. Two-dimensional simulations using the frictionlass flow approximation approach a so-called Batchelor flow, with a uniform rotation in the cavity. This flow is not observed in experiments. For this reason two-dimensional incompressible Navier–Stokes simulations at a Reynolds number, based on the chord length of the airfoil, of 2 · 104 are performed and indicate shear layer oscillations. In order to validate these low Reynolds number numerical results and to gain more insight in the flow physics, flow visualisations are performed in a waterchannel at the same Reynolds numbers as the numerical simulations. The visualisations also show oscillations of the shear layer at the first and second hydrodynamic mode, this is confirmed by hot-wire measurements in the wind tunnel at low Reynolds numbers. The hot-wire measurements also demonstrate that the expected lock-in of the shear layer does occur in a limited range of Reynolds numbers, based on the chord, sufficiently low such that no turbulence is generated, but higher than a critical value. Experiments and two-dimensional Navier–Stokes simulations indicate that for values of the reduced frequency, in the range of 2–10, no significant deviations in the unsteady lift force occur between an airfoil with cavity and the same airfoil without cavity. The cavity does display shear layer oscillations around the expected Strouhal numbers, however, the associated fluctuations in the lift coefficient appear to be neglegible. For the geometries considered the pressure differences over the airfoil are dominated by the added mass of the airfoil.

[1]  Christopher L. Rumsey,et al.  A natural low-frequency oscillation of the flow over an airfoil near stalling conditions , 1989, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[2]  Claude Greengard,et al.  The core spreading vortex method approximates the wrong equation , 1985 .

[3]  S. Dequand Duct Aeroacoustics from Technological Applications to the Flute , 2000 .

[4]  R. Parker Resonance effects in wake shedding from parallel plates: Calculation of resonant frequencies , 1967 .

[5]  M. Mosher The Influence of Wind-Tunnel Walls on Discrete Frequency Noise , 1984 .

[6]  J. S. Sheffield,et al.  Flow over a Wing with an Attached Free Vortex , 1977 .

[7]  J. E. Dillingh,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Ice Accretion on Multiple-Element Airfoil Sections , 2008 .

[8]  T. Colonius,et al.  Three-dimensional instabilities in compressible flow over open cavities , 2008, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[9]  S. Chernyshenko,et al.  High-Reynolds-number Batchelor-model asymptotics of a flow past an aerofoil with a vortex trapped in a cavity , 1998, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[10]  H. Görtler Instabilität laminarer Grenzschichten an konkaven Wänden gegenüber gewissen dreidimensionalen Störungen , 1941 .

[11]  Morteza Gharib,et al.  The effect of flow oscillations on cavity drag , 1987, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[12]  T. Kármán,et al.  Airfoil Theory for Non-Uniform Motion , 1938 .

[13]  T. Theodorsen General Theory of Aerodynamic Instability and the Mechanism of Flutter , 1934 .

[14]  Philippe Lafon,et al.  Aeroacoustical coupling in a ducted shallow cavity and fluid/structure effects on a steam line , 2003 .

[15]  P. Sagaut,et al.  Large-eddy simulation of a subsonic cavity flow including asymmetric three-dimensional effects , 2007, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[16]  C. Fletcher,et al.  Bus drag reduction by the trapped vortex concept for a single bus and two buses in tandem , 1986 .

[17]  Gcj Geert Hofmans,et al.  Vortex sound in confined flows , 1998 .

[18]  Inviscid Batchelor-model flow past an airfoil with a vortex trapped in a cavity , 1996 .

[19]  Eastman N. Jacobs,et al.  Airfoil section characteristics as affected by variations of the Reynolds number , 1939 .

[20]  E. Naudascher,et al.  Self-Sustained Oscillations of Impinging Free Shear Layers , 1979 .

[21]  A. V. Balakrishnan,et al.  Unsteady Aerodynamics - Subsonic Compressible Inviscid Case , 1999 .

[22]  In Lee Plenum chamber effect on wind-tunnel resonance by the finite-element method , 1988 .

[23]  G. Batchelor,et al.  An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics , 1968 .

[24]  R. Timman The aerodynamic forces on an oscillating aerofoil between two parallel walls , 1951 .

[25]  A. Iollo,et al.  Trapped vortices and a favourable pressure gradient , 2003, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[26]  R. Blevins,et al.  Formulas for natural frequency and mode shape , 1984 .

[27]  M. A. Zubin,et al.  Numerical and Physical Modeling of the Circulation Flow in a Vortex Cell in the Wall of a Rectilinear Channel , 2000 .

[28]  C. Chow,et al.  Trapping of a free vortex by Joukowski airfoils , 1982 .

[29]  T. Colonius,et al.  A fast immersed boundary method using a nullspace approach and multi-domain far-field boundary conditions , 2008 .

[30]  F. S. Archibald The laminar boundary layer instability excitation of an acoustic resonance , 1975 .

[31]  R. L. Halfman Experimental aerodynamic derivatives of a sinusoidally oscillating airfoil in two-dimensional flow , 1952 .

[32]  R. Lewis,et al.  Vortex Element Methods for Fluid Dynamic Analysis of Engineering Systems , 1991 .

[33]  U. T. Bödewadt Die Drehströmung über festem Grunde , 1940 .

[34]  S. Isaev,et al.  Numerical and physical modeling of a low-velocity air flow in a channel with a circular vortex cell , 2000 .

[35]  I. H. Abbott,et al.  Theory of Wing Sections , 1959 .

[36]  A. Michalke On spatially growing disturbances in an inviscid shear layer , 1965, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[37]  D. Rockwell,et al.  Self-sustaining oscillations of flow past cavities. , 1978 .

[38]  Clive Fletcher,et al.  Computational techniques for fluid dynamics., 2nd Edition , 1991 .

[39]  W. Jones Wind-tunnel interference effects on measurements of aerodynamic coefficients for oscillating aerofoils , 1950 .

[40]  Tim Colonius,et al.  The immersed boundary method: A projection approach , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[41]  P. Sagaut,et al.  Large-eddy simulation of a compressible flow past a deep cavity , 2003 .

[42]  G. Pedrizzetti,et al.  Vortex Dynamics , 2011 .

[43]  Holger Mai,et al.  Nonlinear Effects in Transonic Flutter with Emphasis on Manifestations of Limit Cycle Oscillations , 2003 .

[44]  J. Spurk Boundary Layer Theory , 2019, Fluid Mechanics.

[45]  Yuan-Cheng Fung,et al.  An introduction to the theory of aeroelasticity , 1955 .

[46]  H. Liepmann,et al.  Investigations on laminar boundary-layer stability and transition on curved boundaries , 1943 .

[47]  Nobuyuki Fujisawa,et al.  Measurement of tonal-noise characteristics and periodic flow structure around NACA0018 airfoil , 2006 .

[48]  K. G.,et al.  On steady laminar flow with closed streamlines at large Reynolds number , 2005 .

[49]  Ann P. Dowling,et al.  Sound and Sources of Sound , 1983 .

[50]  W. A. Timmer Two-Dimensional Low-Reynolds Number Wind Tunnel Results for Airfoil NACA 0018 , 2008 .

[51]  V. Rossow Lift enhancement by an externally trapped vortex , 1978 .

[52]  James C. McWilliams,et al.  The emergence of isolated coherent vortices in turbulent flow , 1984, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[53]  Kenneth W. Iliff,et al.  Aerodynamic Lift and Moment Calculations Using a Closed-Form Solution of the Possio Equation , 2000 .

[54]  K. Zaman,et al.  Effect of acoustic excitation on stalled flows over an airfoil , 1990 .

[55]  G. Batchelor,et al.  A proposal concerning laminar wakes behind bluff bodies at large Reynolds number , 1956, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.