Toward a Common Understanding of Ocean Multi-Use

The ‘open ocean’ has become a highly contested space as coastal populations and maritime uses soared in abundance and intensity over the last decades. Changing marine utilization patterns represent a considerable challenge to society and governments. Maritime spatial planning has emerged as one tool to manage conflicts between users and achieve societal goals for the use of marine space; however single-sector management approaches are too often still the norm. The last decades have seen the rise of a new ocean use concept: the joint ‘multi-use’ of ocean space. This paper aims to explain and refine the concept of ocean multi-use of space by reviewing the development and state of the art of multi-use in Europe and presenting a clear definition and a comprehensive typology for existing multi-use combinations. It builds on the connectivity of uses and users in spatial, temporal, provisional, and functional dimensions as the underlying key characteristic of multi-use dimensions. Combinations of these dimensions yield four distinct types of multi-use with little overlap between them. The diversity of types demonstrates that there is no one-size-fits-all management approach, but rather that adaptive management plans are needed, focusing on achieving the highest societal benefit while minimising conflicts. This work will help to sharpen, refine and advance the public and academic discourse over marine spatial planning by offering a common framework to planners, researchers and users alike, when discussing multi-use and its management implications.

[1]  Martina Bocci,et al.  Exploring Multi-Use potentials in the Euro-Mediterranean sea space. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[2]  J. V. D. Waals,et al.  The compact city and the environment: a review , 2000 .

[3]  Arockiam Kulandai,et al.  Socio-economic dimensions , 2021, Camp Life of Sri Lankan Refugees in India.

[4]  Jill Grant,et al.  Theory and Practice in Planning the Suburbs: Challenges to Implementing New Urbanism, Smart Growth, and Sustainability Principles1 , 2009 .

[5]  Dolly Jørgensen OSPAR's exclusion of rigs-to-reefs in the North Sea , 2012 .

[6]  Francisco Andrade,et al.  Marine Spatial Planning , 2016 .

[7]  Andrea Barbanti,et al.  Sviluppo ed analisi di proposte di ICZM-MSP in aree specifiche: costa emiliano-romagnola. Volume 1: Quadro conoscitivo di riferimento e sua analisi ai fini della pianificazione dello spazio marittimoICM-MSP nella Regione Adriatico Ionica , 2017 .

[8]  Vincent Onyango,et al.  Shared values for the marine environment – developing a culture of practice for marine spatial planning , 2018 .

[9]  Ü. Mander,et al.  Multifunctional land use: meeting future demands for landscape goods and services , 2007 .

[10]  Peter Arbo,et al.  Use conflicts in marine ecosystem-based management — The case of oil versus fisheries , 2016 .

[11]  Cathryn Clarke Murray,et al.  Cumulative effects of planned industrial development and climate change on marine ecosystems , 2015 .

[12]  Jonathan P. Williams,et al.  Oil platforms off California are among the most productive marine fish habitats globally , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Katharina Helming,et al.  Multifunctional Land Use , 2007 .

[14]  Zacharoula Kyriazi,et al.  From identification of compatibilities and conflicts to reaching marine spatial allocation agreements. Review of actions required and relevant tools and processes , 2018, Ocean & Coastal Management.

[15]  V Stelzenmüller,et al.  Co-location of passive gear fisheries in offshore wind farms in the German EEZ of the North Sea: A first socio-economic scoping. , 2016, Journal of environmental management.

[16]  Daniel Depellegrin,et al.  Multi-objective spatial tools to inform maritime spatial planning in the Adriatic Sea. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[17]  Bela H. Buck,et al.  Introduction: New Approaches to Sustainable Offshore Food Production and the Development of Offshore platforms , 2017 .

[18]  Massimo Ponti,et al.  Drilling platforms as artificial reefs: distribution of macrobenthic assemblages of the ''Paguro'' wreck (northern Adriatic Sea) , 2002 .

[19]  Richard Kenchington Planning for Multiple Use of Marine Resources: The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Approach , 1985 .

[20]  Konstantinos I. Stergiou,et al.  Pescatourism—A European review and perspective , 2016 .

[21]  F. Douvere The importance of marine spatial planning in advancing ecosystem-based sea use management , 2008 .

[22]  Vincent Onyango Multi-use concept in European Sea Basins, MUSES project: WP2 Deliverable 2.6 , 2018 .

[23]  David Collier,et al.  Putting Typologies to Work , 2011 .

[24]  Ian Masters,et al.  Building Industries at Sea - ‘Blue Growth’ and the New Maritime Economy , 2018 .

[25]  Steven Degraer,et al.  Coexistence dilemmas in European marine spatial planning practices. The case of marine renewables and marine protected areas , 2016 .

[26]  Climent Molins,et al.  Efficient preliminary floating offshore wind turbine design and testing methodologies and application to a concrete spar design , 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[27]  Dolf Gielen,et al.  Considering the energy, water and food nexus: Towards an integrated modelling approach , 2011 .

[28]  Jiska de Groot,et al.  Investigating the co-existence of fisheries and offshore renewable energy in the UK: Identification of a mitigation agenda for fishing effort displacement , 2014 .

[29]  Steven Degraer,et al.  Bargaining a net gain compensation agreement between a marine renewable energy developer and a marine protected area manager , 2015 .

[30]  L. Crowder,et al.  Guiding ecological principles for marine spatial planning , 2010 .

[31]  Susann Kluge Empirically Grounded Construction of Types and Typologies in Qualitative Social Research , 2000 .

[32]  Katharina Helming,et al.  Indicators for multifunctional land use—Linking socio-economic requirements with landscape potentials , 2006 .

[33]  Gesche Krause,et al.  Perceived Concerns and Advocated Organisational Structures of Ownership Supporting ‘Offshore Wind Farm – Mariculture Integration’ , 2011 .

[34]  Hance D. Smith The industrialisation of the world ocean , 2000 .

[35]  T. Michler-Cieluch,et al.  Perceived concerns and possible management strategies for governing 'wind farm-mariculture integration' , 2008 .

[36]  Kerri Smith,et al.  We are seven billion , 2011 .

[37]  E. Burton The Compact City: Just or Just Compact? A Preliminary Analysis , 2000 .

[38]  G. Krause,et al.  The Socio-economic Dimensions of Offshore Aquaculture in a Multi-use Setting , 2017 .

[39]  Halley E. Froehlich,et al.  Offshore Aquaculture: I Know It When I See It , 2017, Front. Mar. Sci..

[40]  James R. Watson,et al.  The mechanics of blue growth: Management of oceanic natural resource use with multiple, interacting sectors , 2018 .

[41]  Milton S. Love,et al.  Potential use of offshore marine structures in rebuilding an overfished rockfish species, bocaccio (Sebastes paucispinis) , 2006 .

[42]  Janet G. Webster,et al.  Looking for Safe Harbor in a Crowded Sea: Coastal Space Use Conflict and Marine Renewable Energy Development , 2010 .

[43]  Rodney M. Forster,et al.  The effects of temporary exclusion of activity due to wind farm construction on a lobster (Homarus gammarus) fishery suggests a potential management approach , 2018 .

[44]  Gregorio Iglesias,et al.  A review of combined wave and offshore wind energy , 2015 .

[45]  O. Zielinski,et al.  Meeting the quest for spatial efficiency: progress and prospects of extensive aquaculture within offshore wind farms , 2008, Helgoland Marine Research.

[46]  Bela H. Buck,et al.  Aquaculture Perspective of Multi-Use Sites in the Open Ocean: The Untapped Potential for Marine Resources in the Anthropocene , 2017 .

[47]  Sylvain Pioch,et al.  The multi-use in wind farm projects: more conflicts or a win-win opportunity? , 2011 .

[48]  Bela H. Buck,et al.  Aquaculture perspective of multi-use sites in the open ocean: Evaluating the potential of IMTA , 2014 .

[49]  A. Power,et al.  Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world , 2005 .

[50]  Daniel O.B. Jones,et al.  A multi-criteria decision approach to decommissioning of offshore oil and gas infrastructure , 2014 .

[51]  Gesche Krause,et al.  Governance and Offshore Aquaculture in Multi-resource Use Settings , 2017 .

[52]  Nils Goseberg,et al.  The German Case Study: Pioneer Projects of Aquaculture-Wind Farm Multi-Uses , 2017 .

[53]  Darl Kolb Exploring the Metaphor of Connectivity: Attributes, Dimensions and Duality , 2008 .

[54]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Multifunctional Land Use: an Economic Perspective , 2003 .

[55]  Michael Elliott,et al.  Co-location of activities and designations: A means of solving or creating problems in marine spatial planning? , 2014 .

[56]  Bela H. Buck,et al.  State of the Art and Challenges for Offshore Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture (IMTA) , 2018, Front. Mar. Sci..

[57]  Barbara Zanuttigh,et al.  A methodology for multi-criteria design of multi-use offshore platforms for marine renewable energy harvesting , 2016 .

[58]  Bela H. Buck,et al.  Open Ocean Aquaculture und Offshore Windparks. Eine Machbarkeitsstudie über die multifunktionale Nutzung von Offshore-Windparks und Offshore-Marikultur im Raum Nordsee , 2002 .

[59]  O. Llinas,et al.  Multi-use offshore platform configurations in the scope of the FP7 TROPOS Project , 2013, 2013 MTS/IEEE OCEANS - Bergen.

[60]  Ashley M. Fowler,et al.  Rigs‐to‐reefs: will the deep sea benefit from artificial habitat? , 2011 .