Extending the domain of center frequencies for the compressive gammachirp auditory filter.

The gammatone filter was imported from auditory physiology to provide a time-domain version of the roex auditory filter and enable the development of a realistic auditory filterbank for models of auditory perception [Patterson et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 1890-1894 (1995)]. The gammachirp auditory filter was developed to extend the domain of the gammatone auditory filter and simulate the changes in filter shape that occur with changes in stimulus level. Initially, the gammachirp filter was limited to center frequencies in the 2.0-kHz region where there were sufficient "notched-noise" masking data to define its parameters accurately. Recently, however, the range of the masking data has been extended in two massive studies. This paper reports how a compressive version of the gammachirp auditory filter was fitted to these new data sets to define the filter parameters over the extended frequency range. The results show that the shape of the filter can be specified for the entire domain of the data using just six constants (center frequencies from 0.25 to 6.0 kHz and levels from 30 to 80 dB SPL). The compressive, gammachirp auditory filter also has the advantage of being consistent with physiological studies of cochlear filtering insofar as the compression of the filter is mainly limited to the passband and the form of the chirp in the impulse response is largely independent of level.

[1]  T. Irino,et al.  A compressive gammachirp auditory filter for both physiological and psychophysical data. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Ray Meddis,et al.  Virtual pitch and phase sensitivity of a computer model of the auditory periphery , 1991 .

[3]  A. Oxenham,et al.  A behavioral measure of basilar-membrane nonlinearity in listeners with normal and impaired hearing. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  R A Lutfi,et al.  On the growth of masking asymmetry with stimulus intensity. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  B. Moore,et al.  Auditory filter shapes at low center frequencies. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  M. Ruggero Responses to sound of the basilar membrane of the mammalian cochlea , 1992, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[7]  B C Moore,et al.  Dynamic range and asymmetry of the auditory filter. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  A. Nuttall,et al.  The mechanical waveform of the basilar membrane. I. Frequency modulations ("glides") in impulse responses and cross-correlation functions. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  R. Patterson Auditory filter shape. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  E. Lopez-Poveda,et al.  A computational algorithm for computing nonlinear auditory frequency selectivity. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  L. Carney,et al.  A phenomenological model for the responses of auditory-nerve fibers: I. Nonlinear tuning with compression and suppression. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  E. Lopez-Poveda,et al.  A human nonlinear cochlear filterbank. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  E. de Boer,et al.  On cochlear encoding: Potentialities and limitations of the reverse‐correlation technique , 1978 .

[14]  Effects of signal delay on auditory filter shapes derived from psychophysical tuning curves and notched-noise data obtained in simultaneous masking. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  E. de Boer,et al.  The mechanical waveform of the basilar membrane. III. Intensity effects. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Brian R Glasberg,et al.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.

[17]  L. Carney,et al.  Temporal coding of resonances by low-frequency auditory nerve fibers: single-fiber responses and a population model. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  L. Robles,et al.  Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  S Rosen,et al.  Auditory filter nonlinearity at 2 kHz in normal hearing listeners. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  E. de Boer,et al.  Synthetic whole‐nerve action potentials for the cat , 1975 .

[21]  R. Patterson Auditory filter shapes derived with noise stimuli. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  L. Carney,et al.  Frequency glides in the impulse responses of auditory-nerve fibers. , 1999 .

[23]  H. G. Nilsson,et al.  INNER EAR IMPULSE RESPONSE AND BASILAR MEMBRANE MODELLING. , 1979 .

[24]  T. Houtgast Auditory-filter characteristics derived from direct-masking data and pulsation-threshold data with a rippled-noise masker. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  T Dau,et al.  On the role of envelope fluctuation processing in spectral masking. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  T. Irino,et al.  A time-domain, level-dependent auditory filter: The gammachirp , 1997 .

[27]  R D Patterson,et al.  Stimulus variability and auditory filter shape. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  H. Hake,et al.  On the Masking Pattern of a Simple Auditory Stimulus , 1950 .

[29]  R. Patterson,et al.  Time-domain modeling of peripheral auditory processing: a modular architecture and a software platform. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  R. Patterson,et al.  Off-frequency listening and auditory-filter asymmetry. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  B. Moore,et al.  Frequency selectivity as a function of level and frequency measured with uniformly exciting notched noise. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  Richard J. Baker,et al.  Characterising auditory filter nonlinearity , 1994, Hearing Research.

[33]  R. Patterson,et al.  The deterioration of hearing with age: frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram, and speech threshold. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  L. Carney,et al.  A model for the responses of low-frequency auditory-nerve fibers in cat. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.