The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
暂无分享,去创建一个
J. Ioannidis | D. Moher | C. Mulrow | J. Tetzlaff | A. Liberati | D. Altman | P. Gøtzsche | J. Kleijnen | M. Clarke | P. Devereaux | P. Devereaux | Mike Clarke | Douglas G. Altman | David Moher | Peter Gtzsche | Mike Clarke | A. Liberati | Peter Gtzsche | Cynthia Mulrow | Alessandro Liberati | John Ioannidis | P. Devereaux | Jos Kleijnen | J. Ioannidis | John P Ioannidis
[1] D. Moher,et al. Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases , 2011 .
[2] J. Higgins. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration , 2011 .
[3] M Alan Brookhart,et al. Meta-analyses involving cross-over trials: methodological issues. , 2011, International journal of epidemiology.
[4] J. Prego. Use of antiemetic agents in acute gastroenteritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis DeCamp LR, Byerley JS, Doshi N, Steiner MJ , 2010 .
[5] Michele Tarsilla. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2010, Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation.
[6] Howard Balshem,et al. AHRQ series paper 2: principles for developing guidance: AHRQ and the effective health-care program. , 2010, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[7] E. Tacconelli. Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care , 2010 .
[8] D. Moher,et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2010, International journal of surgery.
[9] V. Torri,et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis to reduce respiratory tract infections and mortality in adults receiving intensive care. , 2009, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[10] D. Moher,et al. Reprint--preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2009, Physical therapy.
[11] David Moher,et al. An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[12] D. Moher,et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[13] E. Faerstein,et al. A DICTIONARY OF EPIDEMIOLOGY , 2016 .
[14] M. Schulzer,et al. Effect of school-based physical activity interventions on body mass index in children: a meta-analysis , 2009, Canadian Medical Association Journal.
[15] D. Harnois. Meta-analysis: Combination Endoscopic and Drug Therapy to Prevent Variceal Rebleeding in Cirrhosis , 2009 .
[16] M. Helfand,et al. Principles for developing guidance: AHRQ and the effective health care program , 2009 .
[17] C. Merkley. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice , 2009 .
[18] D. Moher,et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[19] D. Altman,et al. Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies , 2008 .
[20] David Moher,et al. Addressing Reporting Biases , 2008 .
[21] D. Altman,et al. Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies , 2008 .
[22] Denise O'Connor,et al. Chapter 5: Defining the review question and developing criteria for including studies , 2008 .
[23] M. Steiner,et al. Use of antiemetic agents in acute gastroenteritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2008, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.
[24] J. Ioannidis,et al. Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias , 2008, PloS one.
[25] Youping Li,et al. The reporting quality of meta-analyses improves: a random sampling study. , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[26] J. Zamora,et al. Meta-analysis: Combination Endoscopic and Drug Therapy to Prevent Variceal Rebleeding in Cirrhosis , 2008, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[27] Miquel Porta,et al. A Dictionary of Epidemiology , 2008 .
[28] Carl Heneghan,et al. What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews? , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[29] Iveta Simera,et al. Helping editors, peer reviewers and authors improve the clarity, completeness and transparency of reporting health research , 2008, BMC medicine.
[30] Sally Hopewell,et al. Reporting of adverse events in systematic reviews can be improved: survey results. , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[31] Georgia Salanti,et al. Evaluation of networks of randomized trials , 2008, Statistical methods in medical research.
[32] D. Moher,et al. Guidelines for Reporting Health Research: The EQUATOR Network's Survey of Guideline Authors , 2008, PLoS medicine.
[33] Sarah J. Kattau. The Wood and the Trees , 2008 .
[34] G. Guyatt,et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[35] M. Tonelli,et al. Meta-analysis: Antibiotics for Prophylaxis against Hemodialysis CatheterRelated Infections , 2008, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[36] E. von Elm,et al. Publication and non-publication of clinical trials: longitudinal study of applications submitted to a research ethics committee. , 2008, Swiss medical weekly.
[37] Iveta Simera,et al. EQUATOR: reporting guidelines for health research , 2008, Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal.
[38] M. Al-mallah,et al. Safety and tolerability of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor versus the combination of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker in patients with left ventricular dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 2008, Journal of cardiac failure.
[39] Douglas G. Altman,et al. Statistical Methods for Examining Heterogeneity and Combining Results from Several Studies in Meta‐Analysis , 2008 .
[40] Douglas G. Altman,et al. Effect Measures for Meta‒Analysis of Trials with Binary Outcomes , 2008 .
[41] L. Leibovici,et al. Treatment of human brucellosis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[42] Blair T. Johnson,et al. Initial Severity and Antidepressant Benefits: A Meta-Analysis of Data Submitted to the Food and Drug Administration , 2008, PLoS medicine.
[43] R. Rosenthal,et al. Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.
[44] D. Moher,et al. CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration , 2008, PLoS medicine.
[45] T. Wachs,et al. CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts , 2008 .
[46] J. Barkin. The Use of Aspirin for Primary Prevention of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review Prepared for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force , 2008 .
[47] S. Berney. Meta-analysis: Chondroitin for Osteoarthritis of the Knee or Hip , 2008 .
[48] J. Pelletier. Chondroitin for osteoarthritis of the knee or hip. , 2007, Annals of internal medicine.
[49] A. Booth,et al. Do health technology assessments comply with QUOROM diagram guidance? An empirical study , 2007, BMC medical research methodology.
[50] Veronica Yank,et al. Financial ties and concordance between results and conclusions in meta-analyses: retrospective cohort study , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[51] Nikolaos A Patsopoulos,et al. Uncertainty in heterogeneity estimates in meta-analyses , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[52] S. Pocock,et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies , 2007, The Lancet.
[53] F. Bazzoli,et al. Meta-analysis: Duration of First-Line Proton-Pump InhibitorBased Triple Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Eradication , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[54] S. Pocock,et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration , 2007, PLoS medicine.
[55] B. Thiers. Dressings for venous leg ulcers: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2008 .
[56] K. Shojania,et al. How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[57] J. Hilden,et al. Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials. , 2007, International journal of epidemiology.
[58] E. Lim,et al. Recurrence rates of video-assisted thoracoscopic versus open surgery in the prevention of recurrent pneumothoraces: a systematic review of randomised and non-randomised trials , 2007, The Lancet.
[59] Peter C Gøtzsche,et al. Data extraction errors in meta-analyses that use standardized mean differences. , 2007, JAMA.
[60] D. Cook,et al. Surfactant therapy for acute respiratory failure in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2007, Critical care.
[61] M. Sydes,et al. Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis , 2007, Trials.
[62] J. Ioannidis,et al. An exploratory test for an excess of significant findings , 2007, Clinical trials.
[63] J. Higgins,et al. Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography. , 2007, International journal of epidemiology.
[64] E. von Elm,et al. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[65] M Egger,et al. Grey literature in meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventions. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[66] Thomas A Trikalinos,et al. The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey , 2007, Canadian Medical Association Journal.
[67] E. Winer,et al. Association between pharmaceutical involvement and outcomes in breast cancer clinical trials , 2007, Cancer.
[68] M. Clarke,et al. How useful are Cochrane reviews in identifying research needs? , 2007, Journal of health services research & policy.
[69] M. Clarke,et al. Reports of clinical trials should begin and end with up-to-date systematic reviews of other relevant evidence: a status report , 2007, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.
[70] David Moher,et al. Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews , 2007, PLoS medicine.
[71] Christian Gluud,et al. Mortality in randomized trials of antioxidant supplements for primary and secondary prevention: systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2007, JAMA.
[72] Wolfgang Viechtbauer,et al. Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments , 2007, Psychometrika.
[73] Douglas G Altman,et al. Ghost Authorship in Industry-Initiated Randomised Trials , 2007, PLoS medicine.
[74] P. Major,et al. Benchmarking of reported search and selection methods of systematic reviews by dental speciality , 2007, Evidence-Based Dentistry.
[75] A Eisinga,et al. Compression stockings for preventing deep vein thrombosis in airline passengers. , 2006, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[76] J. Lau,et al. Effectiveness of Management Strategies for Renal Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[77] Li Zhang,et al. Reporting of the Role of the Expert Searcher in Cochrane Reviews , 2006 .
[78] T. Peters,et al. Effects of n-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids on depressed mood: systematic review of published trials. , 2006, The American journal of clinical nutrition.
[79] Roger M Harbord,et al. A modified test for small‐study effects in meta‐analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints , 2006, Statistics in medicine.
[80] C. André,et al. Rimonabant for overweight or obesity. , 2006, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[81] P. Mistiaen,et al. Telephone follow-up, initiated by a hospital-based health professional, for postdischarge problems in patients discharged from hospital to home. , 2006, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[82] Peter C Gøtzsche,et al. Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: systematic review , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[83] I. Olkin,et al. The case of the misleading funnel plot , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[84] P. Major,et al. An evaluation of search and selection methods used in dental systematic reviews published in English. , 2006, Journal of the American Dental Association.
[85] D. Moher,et al. Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review , 2006, The Medical journal of Australia.
[86] P. Major,et al. Search and selection methodology of systematic reviews in orthodontics (2000-2004). , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.
[87] Peter C Gøtzsche,et al. Believability of relative risks and odds ratios in abstracts: cross sectional study , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[88] V. Montori,et al. Testosterone use in men and its effects on bone health. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials. , 2006, Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism.
[89] Tania B. Huedo-Medina,et al. Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index? , 2006, Psychological methods.
[90] M. Borenstein,et al. Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis: Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments , 2006 .
[91] Kay Dickersin,et al. Publication Bias: Recognizing the Problem, Understanding Its Origins and Scope, and Preventing Harm , 2006 .
[92] J. D. de Lemos,et al. Effects of early treatment with statins on short-term clinical outcomes in acute coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 2006, JAMA.
[93] Ben Vandermeer,et al. A systematic review identifies a lack of standardization in methods for handling missing variance data. , 2006, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[94] P. Armstrong,et al. Transition from meeting abstract to full-length journal article for randomized controlled trials. , 2006, JAMA.
[95] L. Gluud. Bias in clinical intervention research. , 2006, American journal of epidemiology.
[96] S. Golder,et al. Developing efficient search strategies to identify reports of adverse effects in MEDLINE and EMBASE. , 2006, Health information and libraries journal.
[97] Russell E. Glasgow,et al. Evaluating the Relevance, Generalization, and Applicability of Research , 2006, Evaluation & the health professions.
[98] A. Sutton,et al. Comparison of two methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. , 2006, JAMA.
[99] F. McAlister,et al. Acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: a case study of the pitfalls in the evolution of evidence. , 2006, Archives of internal medicine.
[100] E. Romagnoli,et al. Compliance with QUOROM and quality of reporting of overlapping meta-analyses on the role of acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast associated nephropathy: case study , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[101] D. Ghersi. Issues in the design, conduct and reporting of clinical trials that impact on the quality of decision making , 2006 .
[102] Douglas G. Altman,et al. Elaboración de directrices para la publicación de investigación biomédica: proceso y fundamento científico , 2005 .
[103] J. Critchley,et al. Haemoglobin colour scale for anaemia diagnosis where there is no laboratory: a systematic review. , 2005, International journal of epidemiology.
[104] W. Moss,et al. Safety and efficacy of zinc supplementation for children with HIV-1 infection in South Africa: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial , 2005, The Lancet.
[105] J. Ioannidis,et al. Local Literature Bias in Genetic Epidemiology: An Empirical Evaluation of the Chinese Literature , 2005, PLoS medicine.
[106] Gordon H Guyatt,et al. Randomized trials stopped early for benefit: a systematic review. , 2005, JAMA.
[108] Vic Hasselblad,et al. Impact of the pulmonary artery catheter in critically ill patients: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. , 2005, JAMA.
[109] D. Altman,et al. Outcome selection bias in meta-analysis , 2005, Statistical methods in medical research.
[110] Douglas G Altman,et al. Bayesian random effects meta‐analysis of trials with binary outcomes: methods for the absolute risk difference and relative risk scales by D. E. Warn, S. G. Thompson and D. J. Spiegelhalter, Statistics in Medicine 2002; 21: 1601–1623 , 2005, Statistics in medicine.
[111] Anthony Delaney,et al. A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in the critical care literature , 2005, Critical care.
[112] Christopher H Schmid,et al. In an empirical evaluation of the funnel plot, researchers could not visually identify publication bias. , 2005, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[113] Richard Horton,et al. Putting clinical trials into context , 2005, The Lancet.
[114] Gordon H Guyatt,et al. How strong is the evidence for the use of perioperative β blockers in non-cardiac surgery? Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[115] Paula R Williamson,et al. High prevalence but low impact of data extraction and reporting errors were found in Cochrane systematic reviews. , 2005, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[116] Trisha Greenhalgh,et al. Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review. , 2005, Social science & medicine.
[117] T. Greenhalgh,et al. Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions , 2005, Journal of health services research & policy.
[118] David Atkins,et al. Better Information for Better Health Care: The Evidence-based Practice Center Program and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[119] C. Gamble,et al. Identification and impact of outcome selection bias in meta‐analysis , 2005, Statistics in medicine.
[120] Bess Dawson-Hughes,et al. Fracture prevention with vitamin D supplementation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 2005, JAMA.
[121] Matthew E Falagas,et al. From conference abstract to full paper: differences between data presented in conferences and journals , 2005, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.
[122] Alessandro Liberati,et al. Assessment of methodological quality of primary studies by systematic reviews: results of the metaquality cross sectional study , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[123] D. Cook,et al. Evaluating Meta-analyses in the General Surgical Literature: A Critical Appraisal , 2005, Annals of surgery.
[124] D. Altman,et al. Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[125] Simon G Thompson,et al. Can meta-analysis help target interventions at individuals most likely to benefit? , 2005, The Lancet.
[126] Stefan Michiels,et al. Meta-analysis when only the median survival times are known: A comparison with individual patient data results , 2005, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
[127] G. Guyatt,et al. “Double blind, you are the weakest link — goodbye!” , 2002, ACP journal club.
[128] A. Prentice,et al. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for pain in women with endometriosis. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[129] D. Moher,et al. [Developing guidelines for reporting healthcare research: scientific rationale and procedures]. , 2005, Medicina clinica.
[130] A. Webster,et al. Antiviral medications for preventing cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[131] J M Grimshaw,et al. Interventions to improve outpatient referrals from primary care to secondary care. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[132] E. Ventureyra,et al. Radioisotope shuntograms at the Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario , 2005, Child's Nervous System.
[133] P. Grossman,et al. Mindfulness-based stress reduction and health benefits. A meta-analysis. , 2004, Journal of psychosomatic research.
[134] M. Briel,et al. Effects of statins on stroke prevention in patients with and without coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 2004, The American journal of medicine.
[135] R. Haynes,et al. Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[136] Gordon H Guyatt,et al. An observational study found that authors of randomized controlled trials frequently use concealment of randomization and blinding, despite the failure to report these methods. , 2004, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[137] J. Ioannidis,et al. Radiotherapy vs. nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the prevention of heterotopic ossification after major hip procedures: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[138] John P A Ioannidis,et al. Availability of large-scale evidence on specific harms from systematic reviews of randomized trials. , 2004, The American journal of medicine.
[139] L. Fallowfield,et al. Epoetin alfa improves quality of life in patients with cancer , 2004, Cancer.
[140] J. Lau,et al. Insulin therapy for critically ill hospitalized patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 2004, Archives of internal medicine.
[141] D. Altman,et al. Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research , 2004, Canadian Medical Association Journal.
[142] J. Bensing,et al. Psychosocial interventions for patients with advanced cancer – a systematic review of the literature , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.
[143] S. Taback,et al. Hepatitis B vaccination for patients with chronic renal failure. , 2004, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[144] M. Maglione,et al. Pharmacological and surgical treatment of obesity. , 2004, Evidence report/technology assessment.
[145] K. Broadley,et al. Systematic review of bisphosphonates for hypercalcaemia of malignancy , 2004, Palliative medicine.
[146] Paul Landais,et al. Meta-regression detected associations between heterogeneous treatment effects and study-level, but not patient-level, factors. , 2004, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[147] Julian P T Higgins,et al. Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta‐regression , 2004, Statistics in medicine.
[148] A. Hrõbjartsson,et al. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. , 2004, JAMA.
[149] Erik von Elm,et al. Different patterns of duplicate publication: an analysis of articles used in systematic reviews. , 2004, JAMA.
[150] T. Einarson,et al. Quality assessment of meta-analyses of RCTs of pharmacotherapy in major depressive disorder , 2004, Current medical research and opinion.
[151] B. Djulbegovic,et al. Bad reporting does not mean bad methods for randomised trials: observational study of randomised controlled trials performed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[152] Christiane,et al. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. , 2004, Journal international de bioethique = International journal of bioethics.
[153] A. Hrõbjartsson,et al. Placebo interventions for all clinical conditions. , 2004, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[154] P. Gøtzsche,et al. Multiple publication of reports of drug trials , 2004, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.
[155] D. Altman,et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[156] Christian Gluud,et al. Association of funding and conclusions in randomized drug trials: a reflection of treatment effect or adverse events? , 2003, JAMA.
[157] Ian F Tannock,et al. Factors associated with failure to publish large randomized trials presented at an oncology meeting. , 2003, JAMA.
[158] B. Beermann,et al. Evidence b(i)ased medicine—selective reporting from studies sponsored by pharmaceutical industry: review of studies in new drug applications , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[159] B. Djulbegovic,et al. Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[160] David Moher,et al. The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine [serial online].
[161] D. Rennie,et al. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. , 2003, Annals of internal medicine.
[162] T. Lumley. Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons , 2002, Statistics in medicine.
[163] John P A Ioannidis,et al. Commentary: meta-analysis of individual participants' data in genetic epidemiology. , 2002, American journal of epidemiology.
[164] Phil Edwards,et al. Identification of randomized controlled trials in systematic reviews: accuracy and reliability of screening records , 2002, Statistics in medicine.
[165] Jonathan J Deeks,et al. Issues in the selection of a summary statistic for meta‐analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes , 2002, Statistics in medicine.
[166] S. Thompson,et al. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis , 2002, Statistics in medicine.
[167] S. Thompson,et al. How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? , 2002, Statistics in medicine.
[168] Ethan M Balk,et al. Correlation of quality measures with estimates of treatment effect in meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. , 2002, JAMA.
[169] Sally Hopewell,et al. Publishing protocols of systematic reviews: comparing what was done to what was planned. , 2002, JAMA.
[170] D. Fong,et al. Users' Guides to the Medical Literature , 2002 .
[171] G. Guyatt,et al. “Double blind, you are the weakest link — goodbye!” , 2002, ACP journal club.
[172] Marc F. Swiontkowski,et al. An Observational Study of Orthopaedic Abstracts and Subsequent Full-Text Publications , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.
[173] Peter Jüni,et al. Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study. , 2002, International journal of epidemiology.
[174] Wolzt,et al. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. , 2003, The Journal of the American College of Dentists.
[175] A Donner,et al. Meta‐analyses in systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials in perinatal medicine: comparison of fixed and random effects models , 2001, Statistics in medicine.
[176] R M Turner,et al. Multilevel models for meta-analysis, and their application to absolute risk differences , 2001, Statistical methods in medical research.
[177] S Greenland,et al. On the bias produced by quality scores in meta-analysis, and a hierarchical view of proposed solutions. , 2001, Biostatistics.
[178] P Middleton,et al. Quality of Cochrane reviews: assessment of sample from 1998 , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[179] M. Clarke,et al. METHODOLOGISTS AND THEIR METHODS , 2001, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
[180] J. Sterne,et al. Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis. , 2001, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[181] R. Boruch,et al. The Campbell Collaboration , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[182] F. V. van Tiel,et al. Relationship between methodological trial quality and the effects of selective digestive decontamination on pneumonia and mortality in critically ill patients. , 2001, JAMA.
[183] Steff Lewis,et al. Forest plots: trying to see the wood and the trees , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[184] D. Moher,et al. The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[185] N. N. Available. World medical association declaration of Helsinki , 2000, Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine.
[186] D. Cook,et al. Assessing the Quality of Reports of Randomised Trials Included in Meta-Analyses: Attitudes, Practice, Evidence and Guides , 2001 .
[187] L. Dans,et al. Intravenous immunoglobulin for treating sepsis and septic shock. , 2002, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[188] J L Hutton,et al. Assessing the potential for bias in meta-analysis due to selective reporting of subgroup analyses within studies. , 2000, Statistics in medicine.
[189] I. Olkin,et al. Improving the Quality of Reports of Meta-Analyses of Randomised Controlled Trials: The QUOROM Statement , 2000, Oncology Research and Treatment.
[190] John E. Hunter,et al. Fixed Effects vs. Random Effects Meta‐Analysis Models: Implications for Cumulative Research Knowledge , 2000 .
[191] J Hartley,et al. Clarifying the abstracts of systematic literature reviews. , 2000, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.
[192] P. Gøtzsche,et al. Why we need a broad perspective on meta-analysis , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[193] A R Jadad,et al. What contributions do languages other than English make on the results of meta-analyses? , 2000, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[194] Alex J. Sutton,et al. Publication and related biases: a review , 2000 .
[195] I Olkin,et al. Heterogeneity and statistical significance in meta-analysis: an empirical study of 125 meta-analyses. , 2000, Statistics in medicine.
[196] G. Guyatt,et al. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus medical treatment for non-acute coronary heart disease: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[197] David R. Jones,et al. Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[198] A J Sutton,et al. Publication and related biases. , 2000, Health technology assessment.
[199] S. Golder,et al. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of prophylactic removal of wisdom teeth. , 2000, Health technology assessment.
[200] M. McDonagh,et al. A Systematic Review of Public Water Fluoridation , 2000 .
[201] I. Olkin,et al. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement , 1999, The Lancet.
[202] M. Egger,et al. The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis. , 1999, JAMA.
[203] D. Cook,et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses. , 1999, Health technology assessment.
[204] A D Oxman,et al. The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials , 1998, BMJ.
[205] V Torri,et al. Effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in critically ill adult patients: systematic review of randomised controlled trials , 1998, BMJ.
[206] J P Vandenbroucke,et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test , 1998 .
[207] Christopher H Schmid,et al. Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough , 1998, The Lancet.
[208] George Davey Smith,et al. meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies , 1998 .
[209] M. Egger,et al. Bias in location and selection of studies. , 1998, BMJ.
[210] David R. Jones,et al. Systematic reviews of trials and other studies. , 1998, Health technology assessment.
[211] M. Tramèr,et al. Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study , 1997, BMJ.
[212] C. Counsell,et al. Formulating Questions and Locating Primary Studies for Inclusion in Systematic Reviews , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[213] C. Lengeler,et al. Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German , 1997, The Lancet.
[214] Jesse A Berlin,et al. Does blinding of readers affect the results of meta-analyses? , 1997, The Lancet.
[215] D. Cook,et al. A guide to interpreting discordant systematic reviews. , 1997, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.
[216] James Hartley,et al. Obtaining information accurately and quickly: are structured abstracts more efficient? , 1996, J. Inf. Sci..
[217] A R Jadad,et al. Assessing the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials: Current Issues and Future Directions , 1996, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
[218] K W Kizer,et al. From the Veterans Health Administration. , 1996, JAMA.
[219] A R Jadad,et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? , 1996, Controlled clinical trials.
[220] G. Guyatt,et al. Stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients. Resolving discordant meta-analyses. , 1996, JAMA.
[221] M. Gardner,et al. More informative abstracts revisited. , 1990, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.
[222] L. Stewart,et al. Practical methodology of meta-analyses (overviews) using updated individual patient data. Cochrane Working Group. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.
[223] A R Jadad,et al. Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: an annotated bibliography of scales and checklists. , 1995, Controlled clinical trials.
[224] G. Grégoire,et al. Selecting the language of the publications included in a meta-analysis: is there a Tower of Babel bias? , 1995, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[225] S Greenland,et al. Invited commentary: a critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods. , 1994, American journal of epidemiology.
[226] T R Einarson,et al. Quality of nonstructured and structured abstracts of original research articles in the British Medical Journal, the Canadian Medical Association Journal and the Journal of the American Medical Association. , 1994, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.
[227] G. Guyatt,et al. The Science of Reviewing Research a , 1993, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
[228] Jack Froom,et al. Presentation Deficiencies in structured medical abstracts , 1993 .
[229] J. Fleiss,et al. The statistical basis of meta-analysis. , 1993, Statistical methods in medical research.
[230] J Froom,et al. Deficiencies in structured medical abstracts. , 1993, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[231] G. Guyatt,et al. Users' guides to the medical literature. , 1993, JAMA.
[232] F. Mosteller,et al. A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction. , 1992, JAMA.
[233] U. Ravnskov,et al. Cholesterol lowering trials in coronary heart disease: frequency of citation and outcome. , 1992, BMJ.
[234] J. Cutler,et al. Variance imputation for overviews of clinical trials with continuous response. , 1992, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[235] STRESS ULCER PROPHYLAXIS IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS , 1989, The Lancet.
[236] Harris Cooper,et al. Influences on the Outcome of Literature Searches for Integrative Research Reviews , 1989 .
[237] S B Thacker,et al. A proposal for more informative abstracts of review articles. , 1988, Annals of internal medicine.
[238] S. Pocock,et al. Statistical problems in the reporting of clinical trials. A survey of three medical journals. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.
[239] T. Chalmers,et al. Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.
[240] N. Laird,et al. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. , 1986, Controlled clinical trials.
[241] A Liberati,et al. A quality assessment of randomized control trials of primary treatment of breast cancer. , 1986, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[242] Randomized controlled trials in perinatal medicine , 1983 .
[243] D. Sackett,et al. Controversy in counting and attributing events in clinical trials. , 1979, The New England journal of medicine.
[244] Douglas G. Altman,et al. Explanation and Elaboration , 2022 .