Palatalization in Romanian - Acoustic properties and perception

Abstract This paper presents the results of an acoustic study of fricatives from four places of articulation produced by 31 native speakers of Romanian, as well as those of a perceptual study using the stimuli from the acoustic experiment, allowing for a direct comparison between acoustic properties and perception. It was found that there are greater acoustic differences between plain and palatalized labials and dorsals as compared to coronals. The acoustic results were paralleled by the perceptual findings. This pattern departs from cross-linguistic generalizations made with respect to the properties of secondary palatalization. A likely source of the differences is the fact that previous studies of secondary palatalization typically involved stops which tend to exhibit various enhancement phenomena at the coronal place of articulation. Since the enhancement generally involves additional frication, this is not a useful strategy for fricatives at the coronal, or any other place of articulation. These findings form the basis of a discussion highlighting the differences between enhanced and non-enhanced secondary palatalization.

[1]  Katya Pertsova.  Production, perception, and emergent phonotactic patterns: A case of contrastive palatalization (review) , 2007 .

[2]  José Camacho,et al.  Romance linguistics 2006 : selected papers from the 36th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), New Brunswick, March 31-April 2, 2006 , 2007 .

[3]  L. Auger.  The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America , 1949 .

[4]  Edith A. Moravcsik,et al.  Universals of human language , 1978 .

[5]  D. Steriade,et al.  Chapter 1 Introduction : The Phonetic Bases of Phonological Markedness , 2003 .

[6]  John M. Lipski.  Romance Linguistics 2006: Selected Papers from the 36th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL) , 2009 .

[7]  D. Steriade.  Directional asymmetries in place assimilation: a perceptual account , 2001 .

[8]  Sanford A. Schane.  The Phoneme Revisited. , 1971 .

[9]  Ioana Chitoran,et al.  The Phonology of Romanian: A Constraint-Based Approach , 2001 .

[10]  Máire Ní Chiosáin.  Irish palatalisation and the representation of place features , 1994, Phonology.

[11]  T. Wickens.  Elementary Signal Detection Theory , 2001 .

[12]  H. Timothy Bunnell,et al.  Classifying place of articulation and palatalization of fricatives based on cepstral coefficients and spectral moments. , 2009 .

[13]  Elizabeth Hume,et al.  Front Vowels, Coronal Consonants and Their Interaction in Nonlinear Phonology , 1994 .

[14]  Osip Mandelshtam,et al.  Contrast Dispersion and Russian Palatalization , 2001 .

[15]  Jaye Padgett,et al.  Contrast Dispersion and Russian Palatalization , 2002 .

[16]  Junko Ito,et al.  Feature Predictability and Underspecification: Palatal Prosody in Japanese Mimetics , 1989 .

[17]  Donca Steriade,et al.  Phonetically Based Phonology: Introduction: the phonetic bases of phonological Markedness , 2004 .

[18]  Irene Vogel,et al.  The Domain of Palatalization in Romanian , 2009 .

[19]  Kálmán Bolla,et al.  A conspectus of Russian speech sounds , 1981 .

[20]  Kenneth N. Stevens,et al.  Quantal theory, enhancement and overlap , 2010, J. Phonetics.

[21]  Jaye Padgett,et al.  The Emergence of Contrastive Palatalization in Russian , 2003 .

[22]  Nicoleta Bateman,et al.  A Crosslinguistic Investigation of Palatalization , 2007 .

[23]  Keith Johnson,et al.  The Role of Speech Perception in Phonology , 2001 .

[24]  Louis Goldstein,et al.  Perceptual salience and palatalization in Russian , 2006 .

[25]  Alexei Kochetov.  Phonotactic constraints on the distribution of palatalized consonants , 1999 .

[26]  Donca Steriade,et al.  Glides and Vowels in Romanian , 1984 .

[27]  H. Timothy Bunnell,et al.  Spectral moment vs. bark cepstral analysis of children's word-initial voiceles stops , 2004, INTERSPEECH.

[28]  藤村 靖,et al.  Gunnar Fant: Acoustic Theory of Speech Production : with Calculations based on X-Ray Studies of Russian Articulations, Mouton & Co, 1960, 's-Gravenhage $ 15 , 1962 .

[29]  Timothy J. Vance,et al.  An introduction to Japanese phonology , 1987 .

[30]  K. Stevens,et al.  Primary Features and Their Enhancement in Consonants , 1989 .

[31]  P. Ladefoged.  A course in phonetics , 1975 .

[32]  Bernard Comrie,et al.  The Languages of the Soviet Union , 1981 .

[33]  G. Fant.  Acoustic theory of speech production : with calculations based on X-ray studies of Russian articulations , 1961 .

[34]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Acoustic characteristics of English voiceless fricatives: a descriptive analysis , 1988 .

[35]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast , 2000 .

[36]  Matthew Gordon,et al.  A cross-linguistic acoustic study of voiceless fricatives , 2002, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[37]  Laura Spinu.  Perceptual properties of palatalization in Romanian , 2007 .

[38]  Elizabeth C. Zsiga.  Phonetic alignment constraints: consonant overlap and palatalization in English and Russian , 2000, J. Phonetics.

[39]  Peter Ladefoged,et al.  Vowels and Consonants , 2000, Manchu Grammar.

[40]  Laura Spinu,et al.  Palatalization in Romanian: Experimental and theoretical approaches , 2010 .

[41]  François Pellegrino,et al.  Vowel systems and accent similarity in the British Isles: Exploiting multidimensional acoustic distances in phonetics , 2010, J. Phonetics.

[42]  Alexei Kochetov,et al.  Testing licensing by cue: a case of Russian palatalized coronals. , 2006, Phonetica.

[43]  Laura Spinu.  Romanian Palatalization: The Role of Place of Articulation in Perception , 2009 .

[44]  A. Jongman,et al.  Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.