Student’s social e-reputation (“karma”) as motivational factor in MOOC learning

ABSTRACT In this paper, we analyse the role of the student’s digital reputation as a motivational factor for successfully completing Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). After a review of the academic literature on the role that the student’s reputation plays in community learning and to understand the role of involving the student that new techniques of gamification have taken in virtual learning, an empirical analysis is performed on the basis of data from a pioneer MOOC of Social Entrepreneurship (5016 registered students, 3250 of whom actually started). Using Classification and Regression Trees (CARTs) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA), we conclude that social reputation is a key factor for the student in successfully completing the course, and that the student’s retention is, along with his e-reputation (“karma”), directly related to his degree of participation, the rewards received, and his correspondence with peers. This shows that one of the factors that explain the student’s MOOC completion is his degree of interaction with other students, and particularly his reputation among them.

[1]  Elena Martín-Monje,et al.  Analysis of the Impact of Social Feedback on Written Production and Student Engagement in Language Moocs , 2014 .

[2]  Carlos Delgado Kloos,et al.  Who are the top contributors in a MOOC? Relating participants' performance and contributions , 2016, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[3]  Jinwoo Kim,et al.  Why People Continue to Play Online Games: In Search of Critical Design Factors to Increase Customer Loyalty to Online Contents , 2004, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[4]  Isabel Cantón Mayo,et al.  Calidad de las escuelas bolivarianas de Venezuela , 2014 .

[5]  Chuen-Tsai Sun,et al.  Player Guild Dynamics and Evolution in Massively Multiplayer Online Games , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[6]  D. Hoang FLOW: The Psychology of Optimal Experience , 2018 .

[7]  Chia-Chen Chen,et al.  Exploring the effect of learning styles on learning achievement in a u-Museum , 2018, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[8]  Luis de Marcos,et al.  Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[9]  Hans van Buuren,et al.  Measuring perceived sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[10]  Mitma Enciso Psicología de la Educación , 2013 .

[11]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[12]  I. Yildirim The effects of gamification-based teaching practices on student achievement and students' attitudes toward lessons , 2017, Internet High. Educ..

[13]  P. Whitten,et al.  Re‐thinking instructional immediacy for web courses: A social cognitive exploration , 2000 .

[14]  Pedro Román-Graván Vázquez Cano, E.; López Meneses, E.; Sarasola Sánchez-Serrano, J.L. (2013). La expansión del conocimiento en abierto: los MOOC. Barcelona: Octaedro , 2014 .

[15]  Margarida Romero Game-based learning MOOCS, a flexible time-space solution for entrepreneurship education , 2015 .

[16]  A. P. Rovai Sense of community, perceived cognitive learning, and persistence in asynchronous learning networks , 2002, Internet High. Educ..

[17]  John Morgan,et al.  Will MOOCs transform learning and teaching in higher education? Engagement and course retention in online learning provision , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[18]  Peter Goodyear,et al.  Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: Instructional Approaches, Group Processes and Educational Designs , 2014 .

[19]  Ghada R. El Said,et al.  Exploring the factors affecting MOOC retention: A survey study , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[20]  Erik Duval,et al.  Success, activity and drop-outs in MOOCs an exploratory study on the UNED COMA courses , 2014, LAK.

[21]  Patrick Buckley,et al.  Gamification and student motivation , 2016, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[22]  Yves Punie,et al.  Innovating Learning: Key Elements for Developing Creative Classrooms in Europe , 2012 .

[23]  John W. Rice,et al.  The Gamification of Learning and Instruction: Game-Based Methods and Strategies for Training and Education , 2012, Int. J. Gaming Comput. Mediat. Simulations.

[24]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Investigating How Student's Cognitive Behavior in MOOC Discussion Forum Affect Learning Gains , 2015, EDM.

[25]  Rebeca P. Díaz Redondo,et al.  A social gamification framework for a K-6 learning platform , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[26]  Gi Woong Choi,et al.  Understanding MOOC students: motivations and behaviours indicative of MOOC completion , 2016, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[27]  Scott D. Gest,et al.  Peer academic reputation in elementary school : Associations with changes in self-concept and academic skills , 2005 .

[28]  Teresa Sancho-Vinuesa,et al.  Determinants of Internet use for interactive learning: an exploratory study , 2015 .

[29]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Beyond hype and underestimation: identifying research challenges for the future of MOOCs , 2014 .

[30]  Scott D. Gest,et al.  A reputation for success (or failure): the association of peer academic reputations with academic self-concept, effort, and performance across the upper elementary grades. , 2008, Developmental psychology.

[31]  Daniel Amo,et al.  Approaches for quality in pedagogical and design fundamentals in moocs , 2014 .

[32]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. , 2008 .

[33]  Tsung-Hsien Kuo,et al.  How can one amplify the effect of e-learning? An examination of high-tech employees' computer attitude and flow experience , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[34]  Shang Hwa Hsu,et al.  Exploring user experiences as predictors of MMORPG addiction , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[35]  E. Churchill,et al.  Badges in Social Media: A Social Psychological Perspective , 2011 .

[36]  Kris Bubendorfer,et al.  Reputation systems: A survey and taxonomy , 2015, J. Parallel Distributed Comput..

[37]  D. Garrison ONLINE COMMUNITY OF INQUIRY REVIEW: SOCIAL, COGNITIVE, AND TEACHING PRESENCE ISSUES , 2019, Online Learning.

[38]  Chun-Chia Lee,et al.  Designing Attractive Gamification Features for Collaborative Storytelling Websites , 2013, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[39]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[40]  Ryan S. Baker,et al.  Content or platform: Why do students complete MOOCs? , 2015 .

[41]  Joohi Lee,et al.  An Exploratory Study of Effective Online Learning: Assessing Satisfaction Levels of Graduate Students of Mathematics Education Associated with Human and Design Factors of an Online Course. , 2014 .

[42]  Sara Calvo,et al.  The use of MOOCs in social enterprise education: an evaluation of a North–South collaborative FutureLearn program , 2019 .

[43]  Jingjing Zhang,et al.  Understanding the dynamics of MOOC discussion forums with simulation investigation for empirical network analysis (SIENA) , 2016 .

[44]  Betul C. Czerkawski Networked learning: design considerations for online instructors , 2016, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[45]  Karen Swan,et al.  Building Learning Communities in Online Courses: the importance of interaction , 2002 .

[46]  A. Maslow Motivation and Personality , 1954 .

[47]  Sara Osuna Acedo,et al.  Collaborative lifelong learning and professional transfer. Case study: ECO European Project , 2019, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[48]  L. Czerniewicz,et al.  Learning through engagement: MOOCs as an emergent form of provision , 2016 .

[49]  George Veletsianos,et al.  A Systematic Analysis and Synthesis of the Empirical MOOC Literature Published in 2013–2015 , 2016 .

[50]  Mushtak Al-Atabi,et al.  Teaching entrepreneurship using Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) , 2014 .

[51]  Inmaculada Maiz Olazabalaga,et al.  Design, Motivation and Performance in a Cooperative MOOC Course , 2015 .

[52]  Rebecca Ferguson,et al.  Social Learning Analytics , 2012, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[53]  E. Wenger Communities of practice: learning as a social system , 1998 .

[54]  Monica Aresta,et al.  Peer-supported badge attribution in a collaborative learning platform: The SAPO Campus case , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[55]  Francisco José García-Peñalvo Formación en la sociedad del conocimiento, un programa de doctorado con una perspectiva interdisciplinar , 2014 .

[56]  George Veletsianos,et al.  Digging deeper into learners' experiences in MOOCs: Participation in social networks outside of MOOCs, notetaking and contexts surrounding content consumption , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[57]  Wei-Yin Loh,et al.  Classification and regression trees , 2011, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[58]  Lisa Portmess,et al.  Mobile Knowledge, Karma Points and Digital Peers: The Tacit Epistemology and Linguistic Representation of MOOCs. , 2013 .

[59]  Martin Ebner,et al.  Clustering patterns of engagement in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): the use of learning analytics to reveal student categories , 2017, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[60]  Conrad S. Tucker,et al.  Mining Student-Generated Textual Data In MOOCS And Quantifying Their Effects on Student Performance and Learning Outcomes , 2014 .

[61]  Jon Dron,et al.  SEEKING CONNECTIVIST FREEDOM AND INSTRUCTIVIST SAFETY IN A MOOC (EN BUSCA DE LA LIBRE CONECTIVIDAD Y DE LA SEGURIDAD INSTRUCTIVA EN UN MOOC) , 2015 .

[62]  Julita Vassileva,et al.  Motivating participation in social computing applications: a user modeling perspective , 2012, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[63]  Antonio Sánchez-Mena,et al.  Design of a pedagogical model to promote knowledge generation in virtual communities , 2017, Int. J. Learn. Technol..

[64]  Deborah I. Fels,et al.  Reimagining leaderboards: towards gamifying competency models through social game mechanics , 2013, Gamification.

[65]  H. Hotelling Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. , 1933 .

[66]  Lennart E. Nacke,et al.  From game design elements to gamefulness: defining "gamification" , 2011, MindTrek.

[67]  B. Nagengast,et al.  Perspective matters: The internal/external frame of reference model for self- and peer ratings of achievement , 2017 .

[68]  Antonio Fini,et al.  The Technological Dimension of a Massive Open Online Course: The Case of the CCK08 Course Tools , 2009 .

[69]  Margarita Martinez-Nuñez,et al.  New challenges for the motivation and learning in engineering education using gamification in MOOC , 2015 .

[70]  Pin-Ju Chen,et al.  MOOC study group: Facilitation strategies, influential factors, and student perceived gains , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[71]  Shirley Williams,et al.  MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012 , 2013 .

[72]  Joey J. Lee,et al.  Gamification in Education: What, How, Why Bother? , 2011 .

[73]  John A. Schibrowsky,et al.  Virtual Communities and the Assessment of Online Marketing Education , 2003 .

[74]  Chia-Chen Chen,et al.  Understanding MOOC continuance: An empirical examination of social support theory , 2018, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[75]  R. Pekrun The impact of emotions on learning and achievement : towards a theory of cognitive/motivational mediators , 1992 .

[76]  J. Hughes,et al.  Effects of Peer Academic Reputation on Achievement in Academically At-Risk Elementary Students. , 2009, Journal of applied developmental psychology.

[77]  E. S. Conklin Human Motivation , 1932, The Journal of Religion.

[78]  William Snyder,et al.  Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge , 2002 .

[79]  Chia-Chen Chen,et al.  Animating eco-education: To see, feel, and discover in an augmented reality-based experiential learning environment , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[80]  Hung-Yu Wei,et al.  Exploring Engaging Gamification Mechanics in Massive Online Open Courses , 2016, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[81]  Philippe J. Giabbanelli,et al.  The nature and level of learner–learner interaction in a chemistry massive open online course (MOOC) , 2017, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[82]  Esteban Vázquez Cano,et al.  La expansión del conocimiento en abierto: los MOOC , 2015, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education.

[83]  Felix D. Schönbrodt,et al.  Antecedents and Consequences of Peer–Rated Intelligence , 2011 .

[84]  P. Kroeksakul,et al.  Needs Assessment for the Development of Entrepreneurship Curriculum for a Master’s Degree Program , 2014 .

[85]  Zhenming Liu,et al.  Learning about Social Learning in MOOCs: From Statistical Analysis to Generative Model , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[86]  J. Greene,et al.  Predictors of Retention and Achievement in a Massive Open Online Course , 2015 .

[87]  Burhanuddin Tola,et al.  OUTLOOK ON BASIC EDUCATION QUALITY IMPROVEMENT , 2014 .

[88]  Magne Matre Gåsland Game Mechanic based E-Learning , 2011 .

[89]  Aras Bozkurt,et al.  Participatory learning culture and community formation in connectivist MOOCs , 2018, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[90]  D. Garrison,et al.  Assessing Social Presence In Asynchronous Text-based Computer Conferencing , 1999 .

[91]  J. Hughes,et al.  Joint Contributions of Peer Acceptance and Peer Academic Reputation to Achievement in Academically At Risk Children: Mediating Processes. , 2010, Journal of applied developmental psychology.

[92]  María José Sosa Díaz,et al.  Comunidad de aprendizaje y participación social en un curso MOOC , 2014 .