Trojan actor-networks and swift translation: Bringing actor-network theory to IT project escalation studies

This study investigates the potential of actor‐network theory (ANT) for theory development on information technology project escalation, a pervasive problem in contemporary organizations. In so doing, the study aims to contribute to the current dialogue on the potential of ANT in the information systems field. While escalation theory has been used to study “runaway” IT projects, two distinct limitations suggest a potential of using ANT: First, there is a need for research that builds process theory on escalation of IT projects. Second, the role of technology as an important factor (or actor) in the shaping of escalation has not been examined. This paper examines a well‐known case study of an IT project disaster, the computerized baggage handling system at Denver International Airport, using both escalation theory and ANT. A theory‐comparative analysis then shows how each analysis contributes differently to our knowledge about dysfunctional IT projects and how the differences between the analyses mirror characteristics of the two theories. ANT is found to offer a fruitful theoretical addition to escalation research and several conceptual extensions of ANT in the context of IT project escalation are proposed: embedded actor‐networks, host actor‐networks, swift translation and Trojan actor‐networks.

[1]  M. Callon.  Techno-economic Networks and Irreversibility , 1990 .

[2]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL ESCALATION AND EXIT: LESSONS FROM THE SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER PLANT , 1993 .

[3]  Mark Keil,et al.  Turning Around Troubled Software Projects: An Exploratory Study of the Deescalation of Commitment to Failing Courses of Action , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[4]  B. Latour.  10 ''Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts'' , 1992 .

[5]  H. James Nelson,et al.  BAE Automated Systems (A): Denver International Airport Baggage-Handling System , 1996 .

[6]  Mark Keil,et al.  Why Software Projects Escalate: An Empirical Analysis and Test of Four Theoretical Models , 2000, MIS Q..

[7]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Commitment to a Policy Decision: A Multi-Theoretical Perspective. , 1978 .

[8]  Paul S. Goodman,et al.  Institutionalization of Planned Organizational Change , 1978 .

[9]  Ramiro and,et al.  De-escalating Information Technology Projects: Lessons from the Denver International Airport , 2000 .

[10]  Amany R. Elbanna,et al.  From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures , 2001 .

[11]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Power, politics, and MIS implementation , 1987, CACM.

[12]  Glen Whyte,et al.  Escalating Commitment to a Course of Action: A Reinterpretation , 1986 .

[13]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Organizational decision making: The escalation of commitment: An update and appraisal , 1996 .

[14]  R. Rorty,et al.  Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. , 1980 .

[15]  J. Law.  A Sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology, and domination , 1991 .

[16]  Jonny Holmström,et al.  Drifting technologies and multi-purpose networks: the case of the Swedish cashcard , 2001, Inf. Organ..

[17]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Determinants of Commitment to Information Systems Development: A Longitudinal Investigation , 1996, MIS Q..

[18]  Madeleine Akrich,et al.  A Summary of a Convenient Vocabulary for the Semiotics of Human and Nonhuman Assemblies , 1992 .

[19]  Allen S. Lee.  Electronic Mail as a Medium for Rich Communication: An Empirical Investigation Using Hermeneutic Interpretation , 1994, MIS Q..

[20]  Jonathan P. Allen,et al.  IT and the video game industry: tensions and mutual shaping , 2005, J. Inf. Technol..

[21]  Eric Monteiro,et al.  Changing irreversible networks , 1998, ECIS.

[22]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[23]  J. Brockner.  The Escalation of Commitment to a Failing Course of Action: Toward Theoretical Progress , 1992 .

[24]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[25]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations , 1993 .

[26]  Madeleine Akrich,et al.  The De-scription of Technical Objects , 1992 .

[27]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  Escalation and de‐escalation of commitment: a commitment transformation analysis of an e‐government project , 2006, Inf. Syst. J..

[28]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Expo 86: An Escalation Prototype. , 1986 .

[29]  Timo Saarinen,et al.  Understanding Runaway Information Technology Projects: Results from an International Research Program Based on Escalation Theory , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Jan Mouritsen,et al.  Managerial Technology and Netted Networks. `Competitiveness' in Action: The Work of Translating Performance in a High-Tech Firm , 1999 .

[31]  M. Callon.  Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay , 1984 .

[32]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Knee-deep in the Big Muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. , 1976 .

[33]  B. Latour.  Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies , 1999 .

[34]  B. Latour.  Technology is Society Made Durable , 1990 .

[35]  Allen S. Lee.  Integrating Positivist and Interpretive Approaches to Organizational Research , 1991 .

[36]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[37]  Eric Monteiro,et al.  Inscribing behaviour in information infrastructure standards , 1997 .

[38]  Peter Draper,et al.  Reflexive methodology – new vistas for qualitative research , 2001 .

[39]  J. Hassard,et al.  Actor Network Theory and After , 1999 .

[40]  Mark Keil,et al.  ESCALATION OF COMMITMENT IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT: A COMPARISON OF THREE THEORIES. , 1995 .

[41]  Mark Keil,et al.  Blowing the whistle on troubled software projects , 2001, CACM.

[42]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  GIS for District-Level Administration in India: Problems and Opportunities , 1999, MIS Q..

[43]  Marshall W. Meyer,et al.  Power in Organizations. , 1982 .

[44]  Erica L. Wagner,et al.  Networks, negotiations, and new times: the implementation of enterprise resource planning into an academic administration , 2003, Inf. Organ..

[45]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Behavior in escalation situations: Antecedents, prototypes, and solutions. , 1987 .

[46]  M. Callon.  The Sociology of an Actor-Network: The Case of the Electric Vehicle , 1986 .

[47]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[48]  Mark Keil,et al.  Pulling the Plug: Software Project Management and the Problem of Project Escalation , 1995, MIS Q..

[49]  Zbigniew H. Przasnyski,et al.  On Information Systems Project Abandonment: An Exploratory Study of Organizational Practices , 1991, MIS Q..

[50]  H. James Nelson,et al.  BAE Automated Systems (B): Implementing the Denver International Airport Baggage-Handling System , 1996 .

[51]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[52]  G. Walsham.  Actor-network theory and IS research: current status and future prospects , 1997 .

[53]  Allen S. Lee.  A Scientific Methodology for MIS Case Studies , 1989, MIS Q..