A clinic-based mammography intervention targeting inner-city women

ObjectiveThe objective was to evaluate the effect of a clinic-based intervention program on mammography use by inner-city women.DesignA randomized controlled trial employing firm system methodology was conducted.SettingThe study setting was a general internal medicine clinic in the university-affiliated county hospital serving metropolitan Seattle.ParticipantsWomen aged 50 to 74 years with at least one routine clinic appointment (when they were due for mammography) during the study period were enrolled in the trial (n=314).InterventionsThe intervention program emphasized nursing involvement and included physician education, provider prompts, use of audiovisual an printed patient education materials, transportation assistance in the form of bus passes, preppointment telephone or postcard reminders, and rescheduling assistance. Control firm women received usual care.Measurement and Main ResultsMammography completion within 8 weeks of clinic visits was significantly higher among intervention (49%) than control (22%) firm women (p<.001). These effects persisted after adjustment for potential confounding by age, race, medical insurance coverage, and previous mammography experience at the hospital (odds ratio 3.5; 95% confidence interval 1.9, 6.5). The intervention effect was modified by type of insurance coverage as well as prior mammography history. Process evaluation indicated that bus passes and rescheduling efforts did not contribute to the observed increases in screening participation.ConclusionsA clinic-based program incorporating physician education, provider prompts, patient education materials, and appointment reminders and emphasizing nursing involvement can facilitate adherence to breast cancer screening guidelines among inner-city women.

[1]  P. Gimotty,et al.  Promoting Screening Mammography in Inner-City Settings: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Computerized Reminders as a Component of a Program to Facilitate Mammography , 1994, Medical care.

[2]  B. Psaty,et al.  Alcohol counseling in a general medicine clinic. A randomized controlled trial of strategies to improve referral and show rates. , 1991, Medical care.

[3]  B. Rodda,et al.  Clinical trials: Design, conduct, and analysis , 1987 .

[4]  S B Soumerai,et al.  Principles of educational outreach ('academic detailing') to improve clinical decision making. , 1990, JAMA.

[5]  P. Remington,et al.  Breast and cervical cancer screening in a low-income managed care sample: the efficacy of physician letters and phone calls. , 1995, American journal of public health.

[6]  Michael W. Maples Clinician’s Handbook of Preventive Services: Put Prevention into Practice , 1995, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[7]  H. Goldberg,et al.  Testing the implementation of clinical guidelines. , 1991, IRB.

[8]  J. Mandelblatt,et al.  The costs and effects of cervical and breast cancer screening in a public hospital emergency room. The Cancer Control Center of Harlem. , 1997, American journal of public health.

[9]  M E Gagliano,et al.  A literature review on the efficacy of video in patient education. , 1988, Journal of medical education.

[10]  N. Breslow,et al.  The analysis of case-control studies , 1980 .

[11]  L. Lacey,et al.  Patterns of breast and cervical cancer screening at three public health centers in an inner-city urban area. , 1991, American journal of public health.

[12]  A. Levinson,et al.  Reaching special populations with breast and cervical cancer public education. , 1992, Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education.

[13]  N. Breslow,et al.  Statistical methods in cancer research: volume 1- The analysis of case-control studies , 1980 .

[14]  J E Rodnick,et al.  Promoting cancer prevention activities by primary care physicians. Results of a randomized, controlled trial. , 1991, JAMA.

[15]  P. Simpson,et al.  Statistical methods in cancer research , 2001, Journal of surgical oncology.

[16]  B. Thompson,et al.  Use of Qualitative Methods to Develop a Motivational Video , 1998 .

[17]  P. Armitage,et al.  Statistical methods in medical research. , 1972 .

[18]  J. Berek,et al.  Improving Adherence to Screening Follow-Up Among Women with Abnormal Pap Smears: Results from a Large Clinic-Based Trial of Three Intervention Strategies , 1992, Medical care.

[19]  N. Urban,et al.  Mammography utilization, public health impact, and cost-effectiveness in the United States. , 1993, Annual review of public health.

[20]  L. Goldman,et al.  Appointment reminders to reduce no-show rates. A stratified analysis of their cost-effectiveness. , 1983, JAMA.

[21]  R. Cebul Randomized, controlled trials using the Metro Firm System. , 1991, Medical care.

[22]  R B Haynes,et al.  An overview of interventions to improve compliance with appointment keeping for medical services. , 1992, JAMA.

[23]  A. Marcus,et al.  Initial and repeat mammography screening in a low income multi-ethnic population in Los Angeles. , 1995, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[24]  W. Willett,et al.  Breast cancer (1) , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  P. Gimotty,et al.  Detroit's avoidable mortality project: breast cancer control for inner-city women. , 1989, Public health reports.

[26]  S. Fox,et al.  The Effect of Physician-Patient Communication on Mammography Utilization by Different Ethnic Groups , 1991, Medical care.

[27]  S. Mcphee,et al.  Office‐based interventions to improve delivery of cancer prevention services by primary care physicians , 1993, Cancer.

[28]  J. Mandelblatt,et al.  Effectiveness of interventions to enhance physician screening for breast cancer. , 1995, The Journal of family practice.