Documenting and sharing scientific research over the semantic web

Scientific team members often publish datasets, posters, workflows, and publications at different locations over the Web. If they were to share their information structured and linked over the Semantic Web, they could take advantage of the benefits of automated search, integration and reasoning. Despite producing related information, helping scientists annotate and link information related to a particular research effort on the Semantic Web can be a challenge. What is difficult to track is an overall understanding about the results of the team, e.g., publications, datasets, discussions, etc., the implicit relationships about those results and the resources involved in obtaining them. Having this information might help to understand and contextualize results, e.g., knowing when a publication located in a publication Website describes a dataset published at a data management site, as well as enable automated processing on the information as a whole. This paper will discuss a methodology to guide the process of documenting research efforts and sharing them over the Semantic Web as semi-structured inter-related collections. We have implemented this methodology as the CI-Server Framework to facilitate sharing research information for scientific groups at the Cyber-ShARE Research Center of Excellence. This approach facilitates and promotes documenting research efforts early in the research process, as opposed to being performed as a step subsequent to research, when information may be forgotten or lost.

[1]  Carole A. Goble,et al.  Designing the myExperiment Virtual Research Environment for the Social Sharing of Workflows , 2007, Third IEEE International Conference on e-Science and Grid Computing (e-Science 2007).

[2]  Ann Q. Gates,et al.  Workflow-Driven Ontologies: An Earth Sciences Case Study , 2006, 2006 Second IEEE International Conference on e-Science and Grid Computing (e-Science'06).

[3]  James A. Hendler,et al.  The Semantic Web" in Scientific American , 2001 .

[4]  Ilkay Altintas,et al.  Provenance Collection Support in the Kepler Scientific Workflow System , 2006, IPAW.

[5]  Tim Berners-Lee,et al.  Linked Data - The Story So Far , 2009, Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst..

[6]  John Davies,et al.  Knowledge Sharing on the Semantic Web , 2007, ESWC.

[7]  Lynda L. McGhie,et al.  World Wide Web , 2011, Encyclopedia of Information Assurance.

[8]  Vladik Kreinovich,et al.  Model Fusion under Probabilistic and Interval Uncertainty, with Application to Earth Sciences , 2010 .

[9]  Anne E. Trefethen,et al.  Cyberinfrastructure for e-Science , 2005, Science.

[10]  Eileen Scanlon,et al.  Digital scholarship considered : how new technologies could transform academic work. , 2010 .

[11]  David J. DeWitt,et al.  Scientific data management in the coming decade , 2005, SGMD.

[12]  Deborah L. McGuinness,et al.  OWL Web ontology language overview , 2004 .

[13]  Stefan Decker,et al.  Produce and Consume Linked Data with Drupal! , 2009, SEMWEB.

[14]  James A. Hendler,et al.  Semantic escience: encoding meaning in next-generation digitally enhanced science , 2009, The Fourth Paradigm.

[15]  Huajun Chen,et al.  The Semantic Web , 2011, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[16]  S. Goswami,et al.  Monitoring Ecosystem Dynamics In An Arctic Tundra Ecosystem Using Hyperspectral Reflectance And A Robotic Tram System , 2011 .

[17]  Terence Critchlow,et al.  Knowledge Annotations in Scientific Workflows: An Implementation in Kepler , 2011, SSDBM.

[18]  Vasant Honavar,et al.  Divide and Conquer Semantic Web with Modular Ontologies - A Brief Review of Modular Ontology Language Formalisms , 2006, WoMO.

[19]  Rebecca Koskela,et al.  DataONE Promoting Data Stewardship through Best Practices , 2011 .

[20]  Wendy Hall,et al.  The Semantic Web Revisited , 2006, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[21]  York Sure-Vetter,et al.  OntoShare: a knowledge management environment for virtual communities of practice , 2003, K-CAP '03.

[22]  Wolfgang Reinhardt,et al.  The case for an open science in technology enhanced learning , 2011 .

[23]  Vladik Kreinovich,et al.  Selecting the Best Location for a Meteorological Tower: A Case Study of Multi-objective Constraint Optimization , 2014, Constraint Programming and Decision Making.

[24]  Herbert Van de Sompel,et al.  All aboard: toward a machine-friendly scholarly communication system , 2009, The Fourth Paradigm.

[25]  Dieter Fensel,et al.  Semantic web portals: state-of-the-art survey , 2005, J. Knowl. Manag..

[26]  E. Prud hommeaux,et al.  SPARQL query language for RDF , 2011 .

[27]  Bo Leuf,et al.  The Wiki Way: Quick Collaboration on the Web , 2001 .

[28]  Eyal Oren,et al.  Sindice.com: a document-oriented lookup index for open linked data , 2008, Int. J. Metadata Semant. Ontologies.

[29]  Jeremy J. Carroll,et al.  Resource description framework (rdf) concepts and abstract syntax , 2003 .

[30]  Christopher M. Bishop,et al.  The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery , 2009 .

[31]  Bertram Ludäscher,et al.  A Calculus for Propagating Semantic Annotations Through Scientific Workflow Queries , 2006, EDBT Workshops.

[32]  Paulo Pinheiro,et al.  On the Use of Semantic Abstract Workflows Rooted on Provenance Concepts , 2010, IPAW.

[33]  Ann Q. Gates,et al.  On the Use of Abstract Workflows to Capture Scientific Process Provenance , 2010, TaPP.