Robotic Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy

We present a robot-assisted approach for transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy. The robot is a hands-free probe manipulator that moves the probe with the same 4 DoF that are used manually. Software was developed for three-dimensional (3-D) imaging, biopsy planning, robot control, and navigation. Methods to minimize the deformation of the prostate caused by the probe at 3-D imaging and needle targeting were developed to reduce biopsy targeting errors. We also present a prostate coordinate system (PCS). The PCS helps defining a systematic biopsy plan without the need for prostate segmentation. Comprehensive tests were performed, including two bench tests, one imaging test, two in vitro targeting tests, and an IRB-approved clinical trial on five patients. Preclinical tests showed that image-based needle targeting can be accomplished with accuracy on the order of 1 mm. Prostate biopsy can be accomplished with minimal TRUS pressure on the gland and submillimetric prostate deformations. All five clinical cases were successful with an average procedure time of 13 min and millimeter targeting accuracy. Hands-free TRUS operation, transrectal TRUS guided prostate biopsy with minimal prostate deformations, and the PCS-based biopsy plan are novel methods. Robot-assisted prostate biopsy is safe and feasible. Accurate needle targeting has the potential to increase the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.

[1]  John Jesitus,et al.  MRI guiding future of prostate cancer diagnosis , 2014 .

[2]  Gregory S. Chirikjian,et al.  Ultrasound Probe and Needle-Guide Calibration for Robotic Ultrasound Scanning and Needle Targeting , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Shyam Natarajan,et al.  Prostate cancer detection with magnetic resonance‐ultrasound fusion biopsy: The role of systematic and targeted biopsies , 2016, Cancer.

[4]  Jurgen J Fütterer,et al.  Accuracy of multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer detection: a meta-analysis. , 2014, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  Saila Kauppila,et al.  Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Biopsy-naive Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer Based on Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen Values: Results from a Randomized Prospective Blinded Controlled Trial. , 2016, European urology.

[6]  Dan Stoianovici,et al.  Robot for ultrasound-guided prostate imaging and intervention , 2011, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[7]  Berthold K. P. Horn,et al.  Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using unit quaternions , 1987 .

[8]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Medical robotics in computer-integrated surgery , 2003, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[9]  Dan Stoianovici,et al.  Geometric evaluation of systematic transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. , 2012, The Journal of urology.

[10]  D. Margolis,et al.  MRI‐Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate‐Cancer Diagnosis , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  Tristan Barrett,et al.  Multicentre evaluation of targeted and systematic biopsies using magnetic resonance and ultrasound image‐fusion guided transperineal prostate biopsy in patients with a previous negative biopsy , 2017, BJU international.

[12]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  A Modular Surgical Robotic System for Image Guided Percutaneous Procedures , 1998, MICCAI.

[13]  P. Choyke,et al.  Real-time MRI-TRUS fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsies , 2008, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[14]  Jeffrey K. Mullins,et al.  Ultrasound Guided, Freehand Transperineal Prostate Biopsy: An Alternative to the Transrectal Approach , 2016, Urology practice.

[15]  Samir S Taneja,et al.  Re: MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis. , 2018, The Journal of urology.

[16]  Samir S Taneja,et al.  Multiparametric MRI and targeted prostate biopsy: Improvements in cancer detection, localization, and risk assessment , 2016, Central European journal of urology.

[17]  Baris Turkbey,et al.  Documenting the location of prostate biopsies with image fusion , 2011, BJU international.

[18]  A. Fenster,et al.  Assessment of image registration accuracy in three-dimensional transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. , 2010, Medical physics.

[19]  P. Walsh,et al.  Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer. , 1994, JAMA.

[20]  T. Stamey,et al.  Zonal Distribution of Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: Correlation with Histologic Pattern and Direction of Spread , 1988, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[21]  Robert C. Bolles,et al.  Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography , 1981, CACM.

[22]  Shyam Natarajan,et al.  MRI–ultrasound fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsy , 2013, Current opinion in urology.

[23]  Dan Stoianovici,et al.  Robotic Kidney and Spine Percutaneous Procedures Using a New Laser-Based CT Registration Method , 2001, MICCAI.

[24]  D. Stoianovici,et al.  Tandem-robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy to improve the neurovascular bundle visualization: a feasibility study. , 2011, Urology.

[25]  J. Moul,et al.  Population screening for prostate cancer and emerging concepts for young men. , 2003, Clinical prostate cancer.

[26]  Janet E Cowan,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy During Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance. , 2017, European urology.

[27]  C. Tempany,et al.  The Current State of MR Imaging-targeted Biopsy Techniques for Detection of Prostate Cancer. , 2017, Radiology.

[28]  F. Aragona,et al.  Prostate biopsy: results and advantages of the transperineal approach—twenty-year experience of a single center , 2014, World Journal of Urology.

[29]  Dan Stoianovici,et al.  Multi-Imager Compatible, MR Safe, Remote Center of Motion Needle-Guide Robot , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[30]  Dan Stoianovici,et al.  MR Safe Robot, FDA Clearance, Safety and Feasibility of Prostate Biopsy Clinical Trial , 2017, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[31]  P. Mulders,et al.  The value of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography (MRI/US)‐fusion biopsy platforms in prostate cancer detection: a systematic review , 2016, BJU international.

[32]  Jocelyne Troccaz,et al.  Mapping of Transrectal Ultrasonographic Prostate Biopsies , 2009, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[33]  Katarzyna J Macura,et al.  Safety and Feasibility of Direct Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Using a Novel Magnetic Resonance Imaging-safe Robotic Device. , 2017, Urology.

[34]  Ryan Decker,et al.  Using optical tracking for kinematic testing of medical robots , 2018, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[35]  Samir S Taneja,et al.  Re: Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy during Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance. , 2017, The Journal of urology.

[36]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2017 , 2017, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[37]  Baris Turkbey,et al.  Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. , 2015, JAMA.

[38]  Fang-Ming Deng,et al.  Relationship Between Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Biopsy Indication, and MRI-ultrasound Fusion-targeted Prostate Biopsy Outcomes. , 2016, European urology.

[39]  Monish Aron,et al.  3-Dimensional elastic registration system of prostate biopsy location by real-time 3-dimensional transrectal ultrasound guidance with magnetic resonance/transrectal ultrasound image fusion. , 2012, The Journal of urology.

[40]  G. Croes A Method for Solving Traveling-Salesman Problems , 1958 .

[41]  Chunwoo Kim,et al.  Endocavity Ultrasound Probe Manipulators , 2013, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[42]  W D Richard,et al.  Three-dimensional imaging with stereotactic ultrasonography. , 1994, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.