Three improved neural network models for air quality forecasting

Artificial neural networks (ANN) are appearing as alternatives to traditional statistical modeling techniques in many scientific disciplines. However, the inherent drawbacks of neural networks such as topology specification, undue training expense, local minima and training unpredictability will overlay their merits in engineering applications, especially. In this paper, adaptive radial basis function (ARBF) network and improved support vector machine (SVM) are presented in atmospheric sciences. The principle component analysis (PCA) technique is employed to the ARBF network as well, namely, ARBF/PCA network for the convenience of expression and comparison, so as to fasten the learning process. Comparing with traditional neural network models, the proposed models can automatically determine the size of network and parameters, fasten the learning process and achieve good generalization performances in prediction of pollutant level. The simulation results based on a real‐world data set demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed methods.

[1]  M. W Gardner,et al.  Artificial neural networks (the multilayer perceptron)—a review of applications in the atmospheric sciences , 1998 .

[2]  Wei-Zhen Lu,et al.  Prediction of pollutant levels in Causeway Bay area of Hong Kong using an improved neural network model , 2002 .

[3]  L. Dawidowski,et al.  Artificial neural network for the identification of unknown air pollution sources , 1999 .

[4]  Zongben Xu,et al.  An empirical comparison of three novel genetic algorithms , 2000 .

[5]  Marija Zlata Boznar,et al.  A neural network-based method for short-term predictions of ambient SO2 concentrations in highly polluted industrial areas of complex terrain , 1993 .

[6]  Dominic Palmer-Brown,et al.  Modeling complex environmental data , 1997, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[7]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning , 1995 .

[8]  A. Comrie Comparing Neural Networks and Regression Models for Ozone Forecasting , 1997 .

[9]  Gunnar Rätsch,et al.  Predicting Time Series with Support Vector Machines , 1997, ICANN.

[10]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[11]  P. Hopke,et al.  Application of Artificial Neural Networks to Modeling and Prediction of Ambient Ozone Concentrations , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[12]  V. Prybutok,et al.  A neural network model forecasting for prediction of daily maximum ozone concentration in an industrialized urban area. , 1996, Environmental pollution.

[13]  Philip K. Hopke,et al.  Solving the Chemical Mass Balance Problem Using an Artificial Neural Network , 1996 .

[14]  Wangchao Li,et al.  A variable structure neural network model and its applications , 1993, Proceedings of TENCON '93. IEEE Region 10 International Conference on Computers, Communications and Automation.

[15]  David S. Broomhead,et al.  Multivariable Functional Interpolation and Adaptive Networks , 1988, Complex Syst..

[16]  Martin Casdagli,et al.  Nonlinear prediction of chaotic time series , 1989 .

[17]  Wenjian Wang,et al.  Determination of the spread parameter in the Gaussian kernel for classification and regression , 2003, Neurocomputing.

[18]  D. Broomhead,et al.  Radial Basis Functions, Multi-Variable Functional Interpolation and Adaptive Networks , 1988 .