Encoding of relative enclosure size in a dynamic three-dimensional virtual environment by humans

Human participants searched in a dynamic three-dimensional virtual-environment rectangular enclosure for a distinctly colored bin located in one of the four corners. During test trials, all bins were rendered identical in color, and the shape of the rectangular search space either remained the same or was modified to a relatively sized contracted rectangle, an expanded rectangle, or a square. Participants made one choice response during test trials. In the rectangular enclosures, more of participants' choice responses were allocated to the geometrically correct corners than to the geometrically incorrect corners. In the square enclosure, participants' choice responses were allocated equivalently to each of the four corners. Results replicate previous enclosure size studies demonstrating encoding of enclosure geometry with human and non-human animal subjects conducted in real environments and extend these results to include encoding of relative enclosure geometry. Results are discussed with respect to theoretical accounts of geometry learning.

[1]  Debbie M Kelly,et al.  Reorienting in images of a three-dimensional environment. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  M L Spetch,et al.  Pigeons encode relative geometry. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[3]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Modularity as a fish (Xenotoca eiseni) views it: conjoining geometric and nongeometric information for spatial reorientation. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[4]  S. Shettleworth,et al.  Learning about Environmental Geometry: an Associative Model , 2022 .

[5]  Ken Cheng,et al.  Whither geometry? Troubles of the geometric module , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  Stuart P. Wilson,et al.  Blocking of goal-location learning based on shape. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  E. Wasserman,et al.  Comparative cognition : experimental explorations of animal intelligence , 2009 .

[8]  Debbie M. Kelly,et al.  Spatial navigation: Spatial learning in real and virtual environments , 2006 .

[9]  Debbie M. Kelly,et al.  Pigeons' (Columba livia) encoding of geometric and featural properties of a spatial environment. , 1998 .

[10]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children , 1994, Nature.

[11]  Lynn Nadel,et al.  Children's Use of Landmarks: Implications for Modularity Theory , 2002, Psychological science.

[12]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  How fish do geometry in large and in small spaces , 2006, Animal Cognition.

[13]  Noam Miller,et al.  Modeling the effects of enclosure size on geometry learning , 2009, Behavioural Processes.

[14]  S. Healy Spatial representation in animals. , 1998 .

[15]  Walter F. Bischof,et al.  Orienting in virtual environments: How are surface features and environmental geometry weighted in an orientation task? , 2008, Cognition.

[16]  Allen Cheung,et al.  The information content of panoramic images I: The rotational errors and the similarity of views in rectangular experimental arenas. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[17]  Antoine Wystrach,et al.  Ants Learn Geometry and Features , 2009, Current Biology.

[18]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Reorientation by geometric and landmark information in environments of different size. , 2005, Developmental science.

[19]  P. Wilson,et al.  Blocking of spatial learning between enclosure geometry and a local landmark. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  N. Newcombe,et al.  Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? squaring theory and evidence , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[21]  C. Gallistel The organization of learning , 1990 .

[22]  Ken Cheng,et al.  How honeybees find a place: Lessons from a simple mind , 2000 .

[23]  M Zanforlin,et al.  Geometric modules in animals' spatial representations: a test with chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus). , 1990, Journal of comparative psychology.

[24]  Allen Cheung,et al.  The information content of panoramic images II: view-based navigation in nonrectangular experimental arenas. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[25]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Spatial reorientation: the effects of space size on the encoding of landmark and geometry information , 2007, Animal Cognition.

[26]  K. Cheng A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation , 1986, Cognition.

[27]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Animals' use of landmarks and metric information to reorient: effects of the size of the experimental space , 2005, Cognition.