Encoding of relative enclosure size in a dynamic three-dimensional virtual environment by humans
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Debbie M Kelly,et al. Reorienting in images of a three-dimensional environment. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[2] M L Spetch,et al. Pigeons encode relative geometry. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.
[3] Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al. Modularity as a fish (Xenotoca eiseni) views it: conjoining geometric and nongeometric information for spatial reorientation. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.
[4] S. Shettleworth,et al. Learning about Environmental Geometry: an Associative Model , 2022 .
[5] Ken Cheng,et al. Whither geometry? Troubles of the geometric module , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[6] Stuart P. Wilson,et al. Blocking of goal-location learning based on shape. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[7] E. Wasserman,et al. Comparative cognition : experimental explorations of animal intelligence , 2009 .
[8] Debbie M. Kelly,et al. Spatial navigation: Spatial learning in real and virtual environments , 2006 .
[9] Debbie M. Kelly,et al. Pigeons' (Columba livia) encoding of geometric and featural properties of a spatial environment. , 1998 .
[10] Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al. A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children , 1994, Nature.
[11] Lynn Nadel,et al. Children's Use of Landmarks: Implications for Modularity Theory , 2002, Psychological science.
[12] Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al. How fish do geometry in large and in small spaces , 2006, Animal Cognition.
[13] Noam Miller,et al. Modeling the effects of enclosure size on geometry learning , 2009, Behavioural Processes.
[14] S. Healy. Spatial representation in animals. , 1998 .
[15] Walter F. Bischof,et al. Orienting in virtual environments: How are surface features and environmental geometry weighted in an orientation task? , 2008, Cognition.
[16] Allen Cheung,et al. The information content of panoramic images I: The rotational errors and the similarity of views in rectangular experimental arenas. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.
[17] Antoine Wystrach,et al. Ants Learn Geometry and Features , 2009, Current Biology.
[18] Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al. Reorientation by geometric and landmark information in environments of different size. , 2005, Developmental science.
[19] P. Wilson,et al. Blocking of spatial learning between enclosure geometry and a local landmark. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[20] N. Newcombe,et al. Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? squaring theory and evidence , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[21] C. Gallistel. The organization of learning , 1990 .
[22] Ken Cheng,et al. How honeybees find a place: Lessons from a simple mind , 2000 .
[23] M Zanforlin,et al. Geometric modules in animals' spatial representations: a test with chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus). , 1990, Journal of comparative psychology.
[24] Allen Cheung,et al. The information content of panoramic images II: view-based navigation in nonrectangular experimental arenas. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.
[25] Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al. Spatial reorientation: the effects of space size on the encoding of landmark and geometry information , 2007, Animal Cognition.
[26] K. Cheng. A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation , 1986, Cognition.
[27] Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al. Animals' use of landmarks and metric information to reorient: effects of the size of the experimental space , 2005, Cognition.