Back-calculation of transition probabilities for Markovian-based pavement performance prediction models

This paper presents a new technique to estimate the transition probabilities used in the Markovian-based pavement performance prediction models. The proposed technique is based on the ‘back-calculation’ of the discrete-time Markov model using only two consecutive cycles of pavement distress assessment. The transition probabilities, representing the pavement deterioration rates, are the main elements of the Markov model used in predicting future pavement conditions. The paper also presents a simplified procedure for evaluating the pavement state of distress using the two major pavement defect groups, namely cracking and deformation. These two defect groups are to be identified and evaluated for pavement sections using visual inspection and simple linear measurements. The extent of these two major defect groups is measured using the defected pavement areas (or lengths) and the defect severity is measured based on the average crack width and average deformation depth. A case study is presented to demonstrate the ‘back-calculation’ of transition probabilities. In particular, the impacts of the pavement section length on the distress rating and on the estimation of the transition probabilities have been investigated. The results have indicated that the estimated transition probabilities become highly unstable as the section length gets larger and the sample size becomes smaller.

[1]  T D Gillespie,et al.  Guidelines for the conduct and calibration of road roughness measurements , 1984 .

[2]  Michael W. Sayers ON THE CALCULATION OF INTERNATIONAL ROUGHNESS INDEX FROM LONGITUDINAL ROAD PROFILE , 1995 .

[3]  Samer Madanat,et al.  Computation of Infrastructure Transition Probabilities using Stochastic Duration Models , 2002 .

[4]  Xiaoming Yang,et al.  Evaluation of Current Louisiana Flexible Pavement Structures Using PMS Data and New Mechanistic- Empirical Pavement Design Guide , 2012 .

[5]  Ralph Haas,et al.  RELIABILITY-BASED PROCESSING OF MARKOV CHAINS FOR MODELING PAVEMENT NETWORK DETERIORATION , 1996 .

[6]  Mohamed Elfino,et al.  Pavement Rehabilitation Selection Based on Mechanistic Analysis and Field Diagnosis of Falling Weight Deflectometer Data: Virginia Experience , 2000 .

[7]  Nii O. Attoh-Okine,et al.  Developing Pavement Performance Models for Delaware , 2012 .

[8]  Kristin Decker Modern Pavement Management , 2016 .

[9]  Khaled A. Abaza Optimum Flexible Pavement Life-Cycle Analysis Model , 2002 .

[10]  Monika Richter,et al.  Traffic And Highway Engineering , 2016 .

[11]  R. Stott,et al.  The World Bank , 2008, Annals of tropical medicine and parasitology.

[12]  S. Emerson,et al.  AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials). 2001. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. Fourth Edition. Washington, D.C. , 2007 .

[13]  Baoshan Huang,et al.  Validating MEPDG with Tennessee Pavement Performance Data , 2013 .

[14]  Kelvin C. P. Wang,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of Climatic Influence on MEPDG Flexible Pavement Performance Predictions , 2012 .

[15]  P.,et al.  Revision of AASHTO Pavement Overlay Design Procedures , .

[16]  António Pais Antunes,et al.  PROBABILISTIC SEGMENT-LINKED PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT OPTIMIZATION MODEL , 2002 .

[17]  Khaled A. Abaza Deterministic Performance Prediction Model for Rehabilitation and Management of Flexible Pavement , 2004 .

[18]  Suleiman Ashur,et al.  Optimum Decision Policy for Management of Pavement Maintenance and Rehabilitation , 1999 .

[19]  John P Zaniewski,et al.  PROBABILISTIC LIFE-CYCLE COST ANALYSIS FOR PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT , 2002 .

[20]  Samuel H Carpenter,et al.  PAVEMENT PERFORMANCE PREDICTION MODEL USING THE MARKOV PROCESS , 1987 .

[21]  Zhongjie Zhang,et al.  Structural Overlay Design of Flexible Pavement by Nondestructive Test Methods in Louisiana , 2008 .

[22]  Kathleen T. Hall,et al.  REVISION OF AASHTO PAVEMENT OVERLAY DESIGN PROCEDURES (WITH DISCUSSION AND CLOSURE) , 1992 .

[23]  Yang H. Huang,et al.  Pavement Analysis and Design , 1997 .

[24]  Khaled A. Abaza,et al.  Dynamic Probabilistic Approach for Long-Term Pavement Restoration Program with Added User Cost , 2007 .

[25]  Seosamh B. Costello,et al.  Derivation of Transition Probability Matrices for Pavement Deterioration Modeling , 2006 .

[26]  Devesh Tiwari,et al.  Modeling the Pavement Serviceability Index for Urban Roads in Noida , 2013 .

[27]  Mrcrmsr W. Savnns I On the Calculation of International Roughness Index from Longitudinal Road Profile , 2022 .

[28]  M. Y. Shahin,et al.  Pavement Management for Airports, Roads, and Parking Lots , 2006 .

[29]  Michael I Darter,et al.  RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN INTERNATIONAL ROUGHNESS INDEX AND PRESENT SERVICEABILITY RATING , 1994 .

[30]  Marcus Wigan,et al.  A stochastic-based performance prediction model for road network pavement maintenance , 2012 .