Emergence of collective digital innovations through the process of control point driven network reconfiguration and reframing: the case of mobile payment

Decentralized digital technologies require multiple organizations to collectively create digital innovations. Control over the resources required for digital innovations is often therefore dispersed among multiple actors. Actors may have conflicting interests and business models which cause collective digital innovations to come to a standstill. While existing research suggests various factors that block collective innovation processes, there is still little understanding of how organizations can overcome standstills, and progress to bringing digital innovations to market. The main question addressed in this paper is: How do collective digital innovation initiatives overcome standstills in order to progress in bringing the innovations to market? We offer a novel perspective on the process of developing collective digital innovations based on a longitudinal case study of mobile banking in the Netherlands. Our case shows how parties have collaborated to learn about new opportunities for distributing control and framing solutions, while the actual commercialization of the mobile payment solutions was performed by individual actors. The framework shows how digital innovations emerge through a series of collective innovation processes that build upon each other through control point driven network reconfiguration and reframing.

[1]  R. G. Fichman,et al.  Digital Innovation as a Fundamental and Powerful Concept in the Information Systems Curriculum , 2014, MIS Q..

[2]  Stefan Henningsson,et al.  Inscription of behaviour and flexible interpretation in Information Infrastructures: The case of European e-Customs , 2011, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Donna M. Chovanec Doing interpretive research in a technocratic age: A clash of paradigms , 1996 .

[4]  P. Maglio,et al.  Actor engagement as a microfoundation for value co-creation , 2016 .

[5]  A. Pettigrew,et al.  Studying Organizational Change and Development: Challenges for Future Research , 2001 .

[6]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[7]  Stefan Henningsson,et al.  Digital Trade Infrastructures: A Framework for Analysis , 2018, Complex Syst. Informatics Model. Q..

[8]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  A Collective Action Model of Institutional Innovation , 2006 .

[9]  E. Vuori,et al.  Business Ecosystem as the New Approach to Complex Adaptive Business Environments , 2008 .

[10]  A. Pettigrew Contextualistic Research: A Natural Way to Link Theory and Practice , 1985 .

[11]  E. Ostrom Collective action and the evolution of social norms , 2000, Journal of Economic Perspectives.

[12]  T. L. Schwartz The Logic of Collective Action , 1986 .

[13]  H. Bouwman,et al.  Mobile Service Innovation and Business Models , 2010 .

[14]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective , 2008 .

[15]  Andrew H. Van de Ven,et al.  Running in Packs to Develop Knowledge-Intensive Technologies , 2005, MIS Q..

[16]  de ReuverMark,et al.  Collective action for mobile payment platforms , 2015 .

[17]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary - Digital Infrastructures: The Missing IS Research Agenda , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  A. Gawer,et al.  Towards a Theory of Ecosystems , 2018, Strategic Management Journal.

[19]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Industry-Wide Information Systems Standardization as Collective Action: The Case of the U.S. Residential Mortgage Industry , 2006, MIS Q..

[20]  Yves Pigneur,et al.  Cross-industry Preferences for Development of Mobile Payments in Switzerland , 2007, Electron. Mark..

[21]  Yao-Hua Tan,et al.  Bringing is innovation in a highly-regulated environment: A collective action perspective , 2009 .

[22]  Mark de Reuver,et al.  Collective action for mobile payment platforms: A case study on collaboration issues between banks and telecom operators , 2015, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[23]  Christoph Lechner,et al.  Decision Making Within and Between Organizations , 2012 .

[24]  Stefan Schellhammer,et al.  Developing IOIS as Collective Action: A Cross-Country Comparison in the Health Care Sector , 2011, 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[25]  John L. Campbell WHERE DO WE STAND? COMMON MECHANISMS IN ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIAL MOVEMENTS RESEARCH , 2005 .

[26]  Petter Nielsen,et al.  Grafting: Balancing Control and Cultivation in Information Infrastructure Innovation , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Panos Constantinides,et al.  Perspectives and Implications for the Development of Information Infrastructures , 2012 .

[28]  Eric Monteiro,et al.  Innovation in Information Infrastructures: Introduction to the Special Issue , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[29]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[30]  Tomi Dahlberg,et al.  Past, present and future of mobile payments research: A literature review , 2008, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[31]  R. Salisbury,et al.  An Exchange Theory of Interest Groups , 1969 .

[32]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[33]  R. Eyerman,et al.  Social Movements , 2019, The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Music and Culture.

[34]  M. Olson,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action , 1965 .

[35]  P. Kollock SOCIAL DILEMMAS: The Anatomy of Cooperation , 1998 .

[36]  Sarah Kaplan Framing Contests: Strategy Making Under Uncertainty , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[37]  Margherita Pagani,et al.  Digital Business Strategy and Value Creation: Framing the Dynamic Cycle of Control Points , 2013, MIS Q..

[38]  Booncharoen Sirinaovakul,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue , 2002, Comput. Intell..

[39]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Production of Collective Action in Alliance-Based Interorganizational Communication and Information Systems , 1998 .

[40]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations , 1993 .

[41]  Helle Zinner Henriksen,et al.  A Collective Action Perspective on Technological Innovation in Business/Government Networks , 2007, ECIS.

[42]  D. Snow,et al.  Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment , 2000 .

[43]  Yao-Hua Tan,et al.  Moving an eInnovation from a Living Lab to the Real World: Politically Savvy Framing in ITAIDE's Beer Living Lab , 2009, Bled eConference.

[44]  Carsten Sørensen,et al.  The Role of Control Points in Determining Business Models for Future Mobile Generative Systems , 2010, 2010 Ninth International Conference on Mobile Business and 2010 Ninth Global Mobility Roundtable (ICMB-GMR).

[45]  Ioanna D. Constantiou,et al.  Introduction to the special issue on “Digitalization and the Media Industry” , 2018, Electron. Mark..

[46]  S. L. Star,et al.  The Ethnography of Infrastructure , 1999 .

[47]  LyytinenKalle,et al.  Research Commentary---The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation , 2010 .

[48]  V. Allee RECONFIGURING THE VALUE NETWORK , 2000 .

[49]  R. Kling,et al.  The Mobilization of Support for Computerization: The Role of Computerization Movements , 1988 .

[50]  Robert F. Lusch,et al.  Service Innovation: A Service-Dominant Logic Perspective , 2015, MIS Q..

[51]  E. Goffman Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience , 1974 .

[52]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary - The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[53]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Distributed Tuning of Boundary Resources: The Case of Apple's iOS Service System , 2015, MIS Q..

[54]  Jean-Philippe Platteau,et al.  Halting degradation of natural resources: is there a role for rural communities? , 2000 .

[55]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[56]  Wolfgang Streeck,et al.  Interest Heterogeneity and Organizing Capacity Two Class Logics of Collective Action?* , 2019, Political Choice.

[57]  Pinar Ozcan,et al.  The market that never was: Turf wars and failed alliances in mobile payments , 2015 .

[58]  A. Pettigrew Context and Action in the Transformation of the Firm , 1987 .

[59]  Michael I. Barrett,et al.  Information Infrastructure Development and Governance as Collective Action , 2015, Inf. Syst. Res..

[60]  LandscapesByPeter F. Stadlera Towards Theory: , 2021, Philosophy Behind Bars.

[61]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .

[62]  Oliver Alexy,et al.  Maneuvering in poor visibility : How firms play the ecosystem game when uncertainty is high , 2017 .

[63]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[64]  Ben D. Eaton,et al.  Mobile Platforms as Convergent Systems – Analysing Control Points and Tussles with Emergent Socio-Technical Discourses , 2011 .

[65]  Mark de Reuver,et al.  Governance mechanisms for mobile service innovation in value networks , 2012 .

[66]  A. Pettigrew Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice , 1990 .

[67]  A. Gustafsson,et al.  Defining service innovation: A review and synthesis , 2016 .

[68]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution , 2008 .

[69]  Mark de Reuver,et al.  Collective action for a common service platform for independent living services , 2013, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[70]  이경원,et al.  Collective Action , 2014, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.