Detection of lung cancer on the chest radiograph: impact of previous films, clinical information, double reading, and dual reading.

[1]  J. V. van Engelshoven,et al.  Miss rate of lung cancer on the chest radiograph in clinical practice. , 1999, Chest.

[2]  C. Boggis,et al.  The influence of previous films on screening mammographic interpretation and detection of breast carcinoma. , 1997, Clinical radiology.

[3]  N Taub,et al.  An assessment of inter-observer agreement and accuracy when reporting plain radiographs. , 1997, Clinical radiology.

[4]  C. Beam,et al.  Effect of human variability on independent double reading in screening mammography. , 1996, Academic radiology.

[5]  J. Austin,et al.  Primary carcinoma of the lung overlooked at CT: analysis of findings in 14 patients. , 1996, Radiology.

[6]  S. Duffy,et al.  Comparison of single reading with double reading of mammograms, and change in effectiveness with experience. , 1995, The British journal of radiology.

[7]  K S Berbaum,et al.  Influence of clinical history on perception of abnormalities in pediatric radiographs. , 1994, Academic radiology.

[8]  E. Thurfjell,et al.  Mammography Screening , 1994, Acta radiologica.

[9]  E. Thurfjell,et al.  Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program. , 1994, Radiology.

[10]  B. Muir,et al.  The efficacy of double reading mammograms in breast screening. , 1994, Clinical radiology.

[11]  J. Austin,et al.  Missed bronchogenic carcinoma: radiographic findings in 27 patients with a potentially resectable lesion evident in retrospect. , 1992, Radiology.

[12]  J. Woodring,et al.  Pitfalls in the radiologic diagnosis of lung cancer. , 1990, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  H E Rockette,et al.  Does knowledge of the clinical history affect the accuracy of chest radiograph interpretation? , 1990, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  T. Jung.  [Interpretation of radiographs]. , 1983, Die Quintessenz.

[15]  K S Berbaum,et al.  Influence of clinical history upon detection of nodules and other lesions. , 1988, Investigative radiology.

[16]  K. Berbaum,et al.  Tentative diagnoses facilitate the detection of diverse lesions in chest radiographs. , 1986, Investigative radiology.

[17]  R G Swensson,et al.  The value of searching films without specific preconceptions. , 1985, Investigative radiology.

[18]  B J Flehinger,et al.  Non-small-cell lung cancer: results of the New York screening program. , 1984, Radiology.

[19]  C A Kelsey,et al.  Factors affecting perception of pulmonary lesions. , 1983, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[20]  W. E. Miller,et al.  Lung cancer detected during a screening program using four-month chest radiographs. , 1983, Radiology.

[21]  V M Haughton,et al.  The effect of clinical bias on the interpretation of myelography and spinal computed tomography. , 1982, Radiology.

[22]  P Doubilet,et al.  Interpretation of radiographs: effect of clinical history. , 1981, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  P. Friedman,et al.  Radiologic errors in patients with lung cancer. , 1981, The Western journal of medicine.

[24]  R G Swensson,et al.  Improving performance by multiple interpretations of chest radiographs: effectiveness and cost. , 1978, Radiology.

[25]  D Ozonoff,et al.  Disagreements in chest roentgen interpretation. , 1975, Chest.

[26]  M. Schreiber,et al.  The clinical history as a factor in roentgenogram interpretation. , 1963, JAMA.

[27]  L. W. Guiss,et al.  A petrospective view of survey photofluorograms of persons with lung cancer , 1960, Cancer.