ARID1A mutation plus CXCL13 expression act as combinatorial biomarkers to predict responses to immune checkpoint therapy in mUCC

A combination of ARID1A mutation and CXCL13 expression in baseline tumor tissues improves predictive capability for patients with mUCC receiving ICT. Two markers can be better than one Therapies targeting immune checkpoints in cancer are achieving increasing prominence because they can achieve long-lasting responses in patients with difficult-to-treat tumors. Unfortunately, not all tumors respond to these treatments, and it is not clear how to identify patients most likely to benefit. Previous studies have suggested individual biomarkers, such as expression of the immune checkpoints themselves, but this was not sufficient. To address this problem, Goswami et al. investigated potential biomarker combinations and identified a genetic change and an immune marker, which together helped predict response to immune checkpoint therapy in multiple cohorts of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) can produce durable antitumor responses in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUCC); however, the responses are not universal. Despite multiple approvals of ICT in mUCC, we lack predictive biomarkers to guide patient selection. The identification of biomarkers may require interrogation of both the tumor mutational status and the immune microenvironment. Through multi-platform immuno-genomic analyses of baseline tumor tissues, we identified the mutation of AT-rich interactive domain-containing protein 1A (ARID1A) in tumor cells and expression of immune cytokine CXCL13 in the baseline tumor tissues as two predictors of clinical responses in a discovery cohort (n = 31). Further, reverse translational studies revealed that CXCL13−/− tumor-bearing mice were resistant to ICT, whereas ARID1A knockdown enhanced sensitivity to ICT in a murine model of bladder cancer. Next, we tested the clinical relevance of ARID1A mutation and baseline CXCL13 expression in two independent confirmatory cohorts (CheckMate275 and IMvigor210). We found that ARID1A mutation and expression of CXCL13 in the baseline tumor tissues correlated with improved overall survival (OS) in both confirmatory cohorts (CheckMate275, CXCL13 data, n = 217; ARID1A data, n = 139, and IMvigor210, CXCL13 data, n = 348; ARID1A data, n = 275). We then interrogated CXCL13 expression plus ARID1A mutation as a combination biomarker in predicting response to ICT in CheckMate275 and IMvigor210. Combination of the two biomarkers in baseline tumor tissues suggested improved OS compared to either single biomarker. Cumulatively, this study revealed that the combination of CXCL13 plus ARID1A may improve prediction capability for patients receiving ICT.

[1]  M. Koti Faculty Opinions recommendation of ARID1A mutation plus CXCL13 expression act as combinatorial biomarkers to predict responses to immune checkpoint therapy in mUCC. , 2020, Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature.

[2]  Kathleen R. Cho,et al.  Epigenetic driver mutations in ARID1A shape cancer immune phenotype and immunotherapy. , 2020, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[3]  J. Wargo,et al.  B cells are associated with survival and immunotherapy response in sarcoma , 2020, Nature.

[4]  Jeffrey E. Lee,et al.  B cells and tertiary lymphoid structures promote immunotherapy response , 2020, Nature.

[5]  D. Schadendorf,et al.  Tertiary lymphoid structures improve immunotherapy and survival in melanoma , 2020, Nature.

[6]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2020 , 2020, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[7]  A. Ravaud,et al.  Clinical efficacy and biomarker analysis of neoadjuvant atezolizumab in operable urothelial carcinoma in the ABACUS trial , 2019, Nature Medicine.

[8]  V. Patel,et al.  The role of PD-L1 expression as a predictive biomarker: an analysis of all US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of immune checkpoint inhibitors , 2019, Journal of Immunotherapy for Cancer.

[9]  C. Sautès-Fridman,et al.  Tertiary lymphoid structures in the era of cancer immunotherapy , 2019, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[10]  J. Lavoie,et al.  Predictive Biomarkers for Checkpoint Blockade in Urothelial Cancer: A Systematic Review. , 2019, The Journal of urology.

[11]  Yassen Assenov,et al.  Maftools: efficient and comprehensive analysis of somatic variants in cancer , 2018, Genome research.

[12]  J. Lunceford,et al.  Pan-tumor genomic biomarkers for PD-1 checkpoint blockade–based immunotherapy , 2018, Science.

[13]  Radhika Mathur ARID1A loss in cancer: Towards a mechanistic understanding , 2018, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[14]  Jun Zhu,et al.  EMT- and stroma-related gene expression and resistance to PD-1 blockade in urothelial cancer , 2018, Nature Communications.

[15]  A. Papatsoris,et al.  Immune checkpoint inhibitors in urothelial cancer: recent updates and future outlook , 2018, Therapeutics and clinical risk management.

[16]  G. Mills,et al.  ARID1A deficiency promotes mutability and potentiates therapeutic antitumor immunity unleashed by immune checkpoint blockade , 2018, Nature Medicine.

[17]  Adrian V. Lee,et al.  An Integrated TCGA Pan-Cancer Clinical Data Resource to Drive High-Quality Survival Outcome Analytics , 2018, Cell.

[18]  R. Bourgon,et al.  TGF-β attenuates tumour response to PD-L1 blockade by contributing to exclusion of T cells , 2018, Nature.

[19]  C. Drake,et al.  Biomarkers for immunotherapy in bladder cancer: a moving target , 2017, Journal of Immunotherapy for Cancer.

[20]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive Molecular Characterization of Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer , 2017, Cell.

[21]  J. Lunceford,et al.  IFN-&ggr;–related mRNA profile predicts clinical response to PD-1 blockade , 2017, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[22]  B. Becher,et al.  CyTOF workflow: differential discovery in high-throughput high-dimensional cytometry datasets , 2017, F1000Research.

[23]  A. Ravaud,et al.  Avelumab, an Anti–Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Antibody, In Patients With Refractory Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: Results From a Multicenter, Phase Ib Study , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  E. Plimack,et al.  Nivolumab in metastatic urothelial carcinoma after platinum therapy (CheckMate 275): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial. , 2017, The Lancet. Oncology.

[25]  S. Culine,et al.  Pembrolizumab as Second‐Line Therapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  R. Bourgon,et al.  Atezolizumab as first-line treatment in cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial , 2017, The Lancet.

[27]  J. Lunceford,et al.  IFN- γ –related mRNA profile predicts clinical response to PD-1 blockade , 2017 .

[28]  P. Sharma,et al.  Nivolumab monotherapy in recurrent metastatic urothelial carcinoma (CheckMate 032): a multicentre, open-label, phase 1/2 trial , 2016, The Lancet. Oncology.

[29]  C. Drake,et al.  Programmed Cell Death Ligand-1 Blockade in Urothelial Bladder Cancer: To Select or Not to Select. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[30]  T. Curiel,et al.  Safety and Efficacy of Durvalumab (MEDI4736), an Anti-Programmed Cell Death Ligand-1 Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor, in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Bladder Cancer. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[31]  R. Bourgon,et al.  Atezolizumab in patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have progressed following treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy: a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial , 2016, The Lancet.

[32]  P. Sharma,et al.  Immune Checkpoint Therapy and the Search for Predictive Biomarkers , 2016, Cancer journal.

[33]  P. Sharma,et al.  Nivolumab monotherapy in recurrent metastatic urothelial carcinoma (CheckMate 032): a multicentre, open-label, two-stage, multi-arm, phase 1/2 trial , 2016 .

[34]  P. Hegde,et al.  MPDL3280A (anti-PD-L1) treatment leads to clinical activity in metastatic bladder cancer , 2014, Nature.

[35]  Chichung Wang,et al.  Multiplexed immunohistochemistry, imaging, and quantitation: a review, with an assessment of Tyramide signal amplification, multispectral imaging and multiplex analysis. , 2014, Methods.

[36]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive molecular characterization of urothelial bladder carcinoma , 2014, Nature.

[37]  The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network,et al.  Comprehensive molecular characterization of urothelial bladder carcinoma , 2014, Nature.

[38]  V. Sondak,et al.  12-Chemokine Gene Signature Identifies Lymph Node-like Structures in Melanoma: Potential for Patient Selection for Immunotherapy? , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[39]  E. Mohammadi,et al.  Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of a physiological track and trigger system: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence , 2017, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[40]  P. Dallas,et al.  Expression of p270 (ARID1A), a component of human SWI/SNF complexes, in human tumors , 2004, International journal of cancer.

[41]  Nick Lipley,et al.  Moving target? , 2004, Emergency nurse : the journal of the RCN Accident and Emergency Nursing Association.

[42]  D. Kohl To Select or Not Select , 2001 .