The impact of haptic guidance on musical motor learning

Skilled musical performance provides one of the best demonstrations of the upper limits of the human motor system’s capabilities. It is therefore not surprising that learning to play an instrument is a long and difficult process. Teachers and education researchers alike have long since recognized that while learning rate is dependent on the quantity of practice, perhaps even more important is the quality of that practice. However, for non-trivial skills such as music performance, just gaining an understanding of what physical movements are required can be challenging since they are often difficult to describe verbally. Music teachers often communicate complex gesture by physically guiding their students’ hands through the required motions. However, at best, this gives a rough approximation of the target movement and begs the question of whether technology might be leveraged to provide a more accurate form of physical guidance. The success of such a system could lead to significant advancements in music pedagogy by speeding and easing the learning process and providing a more effective means of home instruction. This thesis proposes a “learning-by-feel” approach to percussion instruction and presents two different systems to test the effect of guidance on motor learning. The first system, called the FielDrum, uses a combination of permanent and electromagnets to guide a player’s drumstick tip through the motions involved in the performance of arbitrary rhythmic patterns. The second system, called the Haptic Guidance System, uses a servo motor and optical encoder pairing to provide precise measurement and playback of motions approximating those involved in snaredrum performance. This device was used in a pilot study of the effects of physical guidance on percussion learning. Results indicate that physical guidance can significantly benefit recall of both note timing and velocity. When subject performance was compared in terms of note velocity recall, the addition of haptic guidance to audio-based training produced a 17% reduction in final error when compared to audio training alone. When performance was evaluated in terms of timing recall, the combination of audio and haptic guidance led to an 18% reduction in early-stage error. Thesis Supervisor: Tod Machover Title: Professor of Media Arts and Sciences, Program in Media Arts and Sciences

[1]  Chris Chafe,et al.  Playing by feel: incorporating haptic feedback into computer-based musical instruments , 2001 .

[2]  R D Tandy,et al.  Optimal length for summary knowledge of results: the influence of task-related experience and complexity. , 1996, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[3]  J. S. Scott Kelso,et al.  Planning and Efferent Components in the Coding of Movement , 2013 .

[4]  Dorothy Swainson,et al.  The Physiological Mechanics of Piano Technique , 1962 .

[5]  F. Paas,et al.  Teaching complex rather than simple tasks: balancing intrinsic and germane load to enhance transfer of learning , 2006 .

[6]  Sher ry Folsom-Meek,et al.  Human Performance , 1953, Nature.

[7]  J Liu,et al.  Learning to perform a new movement with robotic assistance: comparison of haptic guidance and visual demonstration , 2006, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[8]  M. Sile O'Modhrain,et al.  The Virtual Teacher , 1999 .

[9]  C. Winstein,et al.  Effects of physical guidance and knowledge of results on motor learning: support for the guidance hypothesis. , 1994, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[10]  Daniel Gopher,et al.  The Effects of Visual and Proprioceptive Feedback on Motor Learning , 1975 .

[11]  P. Wiseman The Virtual Teacher , 1998 .

[12]  H Carnahan,et al.  On the role of knowledge of results in motor learning: exploring the guidance hypothesis. , 1990, Journal of motor behavior.

[13]  Richard A. Schmidt,et al.  The learning of generalized motor programs: Reducing the relative frequency of knowledge of results enhances memory. , 1989 .

[14]  J D Hagman,et al.  Presentation- and test-trial effects on acquisition and retention of distance and location. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical reappraisal. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  Hermano I Krebs,et al.  Rehabilitation robotics: pilot trial of a spatial extension for MIT-Manus , 2004, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[17]  D. C. Shapiro,et al.  Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: support for the guidance hypothesis. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  E. Boyden,et al.  Selective Engagement of Plasticity Mechanisms for Motor Memory Storage , 2006, Neuron.

[19]  Richard A. Schmidt,et al.  Optimizing summary knowledge of results for skill learning , 1990 .

[20]  D. H. Holding,et al.  GUIDANCE, RESTRICTION AND KNOWLEDGE OF RESULTS , 1964 .

[21]  R. Brent Gillespie,et al.  Haptic feedback improves manual excitation of a sprung mass , 2004, 12th International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 2004. HAPTICS '04. Proceedings..

[22]  T. Perneger What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments , 1998, BMJ.

[23]  Stephan P. Swinnen,et al.  Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: support for the guidance hypothesis , 1989 .

[24]  D. C. Shapiro,et al.  Information Feedback for Skill Acquisition: Instantaneous Knowledge of Results Degrades Learning , 1990 .

[25]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  Haptic Feedback Enhances Force Skill Learning , 2007, Second Joint EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (WHC'07).

[26]  T. Gasser,et al.  Alignment of curves by dynamic time warping , 1997 .

[27]  Tsuneo Yoshikawa,et al.  Toward machine mediated training of motor skills. Skill transfer from human to human via virtual environment , 1996, Proceedings 5th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication. RO-MAN'96 TSUKUBA.

[28]  D L Wright,et al.  Can Observational Practice Facilitate Error Recognition and Movement Production? , 2000, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[29]  E. Boyden,et al.  Cerebellum-dependent learning: the role of multiple plasticity mechanisms. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[30]  Quinn McNemar,et al.  Statistical Analysis in Psychology and Education. , 1967 .

[31]  L. Proteau,et al.  Cognitive Processes Underlying Observational Learning of Motor Skills , 1999 .

[32]  Frank Tendick,et al.  Haptic guidance: experimental evaluation of a haptic training method for a perceptual motor skill , 2002, Proceedings 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. HAPTICS 2002.

[33]  W. Rymer,et al.  Understanding and treating arm movement impairment after chronic brain injury: progress with the ARM guide. , 2014, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[34]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[35]  J. Lieberman Accelerated and improved motor learning and rehabilitation using kinesthetic feedback , 2006 .

[36]  Daniel Gopher,et al.  Adaptive training of perceptual-motor skills: issues, results, and future directions , 1978 .

[37]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. , 1990 .

[38]  G Wulf,et al.  Physical-guidance benefits in learning a complex motor skill. , 1998, Journal of motor behavior.

[39]  Charles Nichols The vBow: Development of a Virtual Violin Bow Controller Haptic Human-Computer Interface , 2002, NIME.

[40]  Edward S Boyden,et al.  Active Reversal of Motor Memories Reveals Rules Governing Memory Encoding , 2003, Neuron.