Development of HEATHER for Cochlear Implant Stimulation Using a New Modeling Workflow

The current conduction pathways resulting from monopolar stimulation of the cochlear implant were studied by developing a human electroanatomical total head reconstruction (namely, HEATHER). HEATHER was created from serially sectioned images of the female Visible Human Project dataset to encompass a total of 12 different tissues, and included computer-aided design geometries of the cochlear implant. Since existing methods were unable to generate the required complexity for HEATHER, a new modeling workflow was proposed. The results of the finite-element analysis agree with the literature, showing that the injected current exits the cochlea via the modiolus (14%), the basal end of the cochlea (22%), and through the cochlear walls (64%). It was also found that, once leaving the cochlea, the current travels to the implant body via the cranial cavity or scalp. The modeling workflow proved to be robust and flexible, allowing for meshes to be generated with substantial user control. Furthermore, the workflow could easily be employed to create realistic anatomical models of the human head for different bioelectric applications, such as deep brain stimulation, electroencephalography, and other biophysical phenomena.

[1]  R. K. Kalkman,et al.  Stimulation of the Facial Nerve by Intracochlear Electrodes in Otosclerosis: A Computer Modeling Study , 2009, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[2]  P. Knupp.  Achieving finite element mesh quality via optimization of the jacobian matrix norm and associated qu , 2000 .

[3]  Paul J. Abbas,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Electrode Impedance, the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential, and Behavioral Measures in Nucleus 24 Cochlear Implant Users , 2001, Ear and hearing.

[4]  J. J. Grote,et al.  The Importance of Human Cochlear Anatomy for the Results of Modiolus-Hugging Multichannel Cochlear Implants , 2001, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[5]  P. Wen,et al.  Effects of local tissue conductivity on spherical and realistic head models , 2010, Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine.

[6]  Madeleine M. Lowery,et al.  lectric field distribution in a finite-volume head model of deep brain stimulation , 2009 .

[7]  Johan Frijns,et al.  The Facial Nerve Canal: An Important Cochlear Conduction Path Revealed by Clarion Electrical Field Imaging , 2004, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[8]  J. Toby Mottram,et al.  Using Finite Elements in Mechanical Design , 1996 .

[9]  P. Carter,et al.  Incorporating vascular structure into electric volume conduction models of the cochlea , 2012, 2012 IEEE-EMBS Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Sciences.

[10]  V. Spitzer,et al.  The visible human male: a technical report. , 1996, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[11]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  Changes of Postoperative Impedances in Cochlear Implant Patients: The Short-Term Effects of Modified Electrode Surfaces and Intracochlear Corticosteroids , 2006, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[12]  Markus Zahn,et al.  Three-dimensional head model Simulation of transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Claus-Peter Richter,et al.  Tissue resistivities determine the current flow in the cochlea , 2006, Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery.

[14]  J. Haueisen,et al.  Influence of tissue resistivities on neuromagnetic fields and electric potentials studied with a finite element model of the head , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  J. Haueisen,et al.  Influence of head models on EEG simulations and inverse source localizations , 2006, Biomedical engineering online.

[16]  Fabrizio Esposito,et al.  Realistic and Spherical Head Modeling for EEG Forward Problem Solution: A Comparative Cortex-Based Analysis , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[17]  S. K. Law,et al.  Thickness and resistivity variations over the upper surface of the human skull , 2005, Brain Topography.

[18]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Cochlear Implants: System Design, Integration, and Evaluation , 2008, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  D.R. Jackson,et al.  Effect of conductivity uncertainties and modeling errors on EEG source localization using a 2-D model , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  Yan Zhao,et al.  A New Segmentation Algorithm for the Visible Human Data , 2005, 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference.

[21]  L H Mens,et al.  Modelling surface potentials from intracochlear electrical stimulation. , 1999, Scandinavian audiology.

[22]  Carsten Potratz,et al.  Challenges in bio-electromagnetic modeling , 2010, 2010 URSI International Symposium on Electromagnetic Theory.

[23]  Qing Li,et al.  Three-dimensional finite element modeling of Cochlear implant induced electrical current flows , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Measurement Systems and Applications.

[24]  Blake S. Wilson,et al.  Cochlear implants: A remarkable past and a brilliant future , 2008, Hearing Research.

[25]  G. Girzon,et al.  Investigation of current flow in the inner ear during electrical stimulation of intracochlear electrodes , 1987 .

[26]  Phillip Tran,et al.  Finite Element Modeling of Current Flow from Cochlear Implant Stimulation , 2011 .

[27]  Richard Ramsden,et al.  Cochlear implantation in otosclerotic deafness. , 2007, Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology.

[28]  Madeleine M Lowery,et al.  Electric field distribution in a finite-volume head model of deep brain stimulation. , 2009, Medical engineering & physics.

[29]  J N Sahalos,et al.  A realistic three dimensional FEM of the human head. , 2001, Physiological measurement.

[30]  R. Sadleir,et al.  Predicted current densities in the brain during transcranial electrical stimulation , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[31]  William Bickford,et al.  A first course in the finite element method , 1990 .

[32]  Mikael Persson,et al.  Computation of electric and magnetic stimulation in human head using the 3-D impedance method , 2003, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng..

[33]  Qing Li,et al.  Subject Specific Modelling of Electrical Conduction in the Body: A Case Study , 2011 .

[34]  Blake S. Wilson,et al.  The design of cochlear implants , 2012 .

[35]  C. Richter.  Cochlear Implants: Fundamentals and Applications , 2004 .

[36]  Andrian Sue,et al.  Influence of blood vessel conductivity in cochlear implant stimulation using a finite element head model , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[37]  David R. Wozny,et al.  The electrical conductivity of human cerebrospinal fluid at body temperature , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[38]  Charles C. Finley,et al.  Models of Neural Responsiveness to Electrical Stimulation , 1990 .

[39]  C.T.M. Choi,et al.  Optimization of cochlear implant electrode array using genetic algorithms and computational neuroscience models , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[40]  Jens Haueisen,et al.  Realistic Computer Modelling of Electric and Magnetic Fields of Human Head and Torso , 1998, Parallel Comput..

[41]  Ming Chen,et al.  Using Increased Structural Detail of the Cortex to Improve the Accuracy of Modeling the Effects of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Neocortical Activation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[42]  Helge Rask-Andersen,et al.  Variational Anatomy of the Human Cochlea: Implications for Cochlear Implantation , 2009, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[43]  S. Dokos,et al.  A computational model of direct brain excitation induced by electroconvulsive therapy: Comparison among three conventional electrode placements , 2012, Brain Stimulation.

[44]  Jens Haueisen,et al.  Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study , 2010, NeuroImage.

[45]  C. McIntyre,et al.  Tissue and electrode capacitance reduce neural activation volumes during deep brain stimulation , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[46]  L. Geddes,et al.  The specific resistance of biological material—A compendium of data for the biomedical engineer and physiologist , 1967, Medical and biological engineering.

[47]  B M Clopton,et al.  Tissue impedance and current flow in the implanted ear. Implications for the cochlear prosthesis. , 1982, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[48]  Won Hee Lee,et al.  Regional electric field induced by electroconvulsive therapy in a realistic finite element head model: Influence of white matter anisotropic conductivity , 2012, NeuroImage.

[49]  A. B. Grayeli,et al.  Temporal bone density measurements using CT in otosclerosis , 2004, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[50]  T Hanekom,et al.  Three-Dimensional Spiraling Finite Element Model of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlea , 2001, Ear and hearing.

[51]  Joseph H. Schulman,et al.  Multichannel cochlear implant system including wearable speech processor , 1997 .