Location and Interaction in Row-and-Column Seating Arrangements

The verbal behavior, physical locations, and seat preferences of members of large groups assembled in row-and-column seating arrangements were investigated. In several trials of the experiment subjects had been categorized a priori as "high," "moderate," or "low" in respect to verbalization rates and then were randomly assigned to seats without regard for these rates. Subsequent research procedures revealed that location significantly affected the verbalization rates of the "highs" and the "moderates." Centrally located seats were associated with significantly higher verbalization rates on the part of their occupants than were noncentrally located seats. These findings confirmed the observations of previous investigators that there is an "ecology of participation" in classrooms which may make it possible to predict from which locations most verbalizations would emanate. Through the administration of a projective procedure it was also revealed that "high" verbalizers chose central seats to a greater degree and extent than did "low" verbalizers. The seat preferences of "high" and "moderate" verbalizers also differed significantly; "high" verbalizers preferred central seats to a greater extent than did "moderate" verbalizers. Some aspects of coping theory were offered as a possible explanation of this behavior.

[1]  Albert Mehrabian,et al.  Effects of Furniture Arrangement, Props, and Personality on Social Interaction. , 1971 .

[2]  I. Altman,et al.  Social and psychological factors in stress. , 1970 .

[3]  B STEINZOR,et al.  The spatial factor in face to face discussion groups. , 1950, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[4]  B. Biddle,et al.  Realities of teaching;: Explorations with video tape , 1970 .

[5]  G HEARN,et al.  Leadership and the spatial factor in small groups. , 1957, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[6]  S. Becker,et al.  Seating arrangement and leadership emergence. , 1962, Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology.

[7]  Robert Sommer,et al.  The Distance for Comfortable Conversation: A Further Study , 1962 .

[8]  M. Cook Experiments on Orientation and Proxemics , 1970 .

[9]  A. Paul Hare,et al.  Seating Position and Small Group Interaction , 1963 .

[10]  D. Stea,et al.  Architectural Programming, Environmental Design, and Human Behavior , 1966 .

[11]  Sandra C. Howell,et al.  Spatial Behavior of Older People , 1972 .

[12]  F. Strodtbeck,et al.  The social dimensions of a twelve-man jury table. , 1961 .

[13]  Raymond S. Adams Location as a Feature of Instructional Interaction. , 1969 .

[14]  R. Sommer,et al.  Seating patterns and group task , 1967 .

[15]  M. Argyle,et al.  EYE-CONTACT, DISTANCE AND AFFILIATION. , 1965, Sociometry.

[16]  I. Altman,et al.  Small Group Research: A Synthesis and Critique of the Field , 1966 .

[17]  R. Sommer Studies in Personal space , 1959 .

[18]  H. Osmond,et al.  Function as the Basis of Psychiatric Ward Design , 1957 .