Simultaneous 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/MRI in Patients With Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Initial Results

ObjectivesThe aim of this pilot study was to demonstrate the potential of simultaneously acquired 68-Gallium-DOTA-D-Phe1-Tyr3-octreotide (68Ga-DOTATOC) positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) in comparison with 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with known gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Materials and MethodsEight patients (4 women and 4 men; mean [SD] age, 54 [17] years; median, 55 years; range 25–74 years) with histopathologically confirmed NET and scheduled 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT were prospectively enrolled for an additional integrated PET/MRI scan. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography was performed using a triple-phase contrast-enhanced full-dose protocol. Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging encompassed a diagnostic, contrast-enhanced whole-body MRI protocol. Two readers separately analyzed the PET/CT and PET/MRI data sets including their subscans in random order regarding lesion localization, count, and characterization on a 4-point ordinal scale (0, not visible; 1, benign; 2, indeterminate; and 3, malignant). In addition, each lesion was rated in consensus on a binary scale (allowing for benign/malignant only). Clinical imaging, existing prior examinations, and histopathology (if available) served as the standard of reference. In PET-positive lesions, the standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was measured in consensus. A descriptive, case-oriented data analysis was performed, including determination of frequencies and percentages in detection of malignant, benign, and indeterminate lesions in connection to their localization. In addition, percentages in detection by a singular modality (such as PET, CT, or MRI) were calculated. Interobserver variability was calculated (Cohen's &kgr;). The SUVs in the lesions in PET/CT and PET/MRI were measured, and the correlation coefficient (Pearson, 2-tailed) was calculated. ResultsAccording to the reference standard, 5 of the 8 patients had malignant NET lesions at the time of the examination. A total of 4 patients were correctly identified by PET/CT, with the PET and CT component correctly identifying 3 patients each. All 5 patients positive for NET disease were correctly identified by PET/MRI, with the MRI subscan identifying all 5 patients and the PET subscan identifying 3 patients. All lesions considered as malignant in PET/CT were equally depicted in and considered using PET/MRI. One liver lesion rated as “indetermined” in PET/CT was identified as metastasis in PET/MRI because of a diffusion restriction in diffusion-weighted imaging. Of the 4 lung lesions characterized in PET/CT, only 1 was depicted in PET/MRI. Of the 3 lymph nodes depicted in PET/CT, only 1 was characterized in PET/MRI. Interobserver reliability was equally very good in PET/CT (&kgr; = 0.916) and PET/MRI (&kgr; = 1.0). The SUVmax measured in PET/CT and in PET/MRI showed a strong correlation (Pearson correlation coefficient, 0.996). ConclusionsThis pilot study demonstrates the potential of 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/MRI in patients with gastroenteropancreatic NET, with special advantages in the characterization of abdominal lesions yet certain weaknesses inherent to MRI, such as lung metastases and hypersclerotic bone lesions.

[1]  J. Walecki,et al.  The clinical value of MRI using single-shot echoplanar DWI to identify liver involvement in patients with advanced gastroenteropancreatic-neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs), compared to FSE T2 and FFE T1 weighted image after i.v. Gd-EOB-DTPA contrast enhancement , 2012, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[2]  I. Burger,et al.  PET/MR imaging of bone lesions – implications for PET quantification from imperfect attenuation correction , 2012, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[3]  A. Campus Role of ~(68)Ga-DOTATOC PET-CT in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours , 2012 .

[4]  J. Ruf Cost comparison of 111In-DTPA-octreotide scintigraphy and 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in Germany: two sides of two different coins , 2012, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[5]  I. Steffen,et al.  Evaluation of the potential of PET-MRI fusion for detection of liver metastases in patients with neuroendocrine tumours , 2012, European Radiology.

[6]  C. Boy,et al.  68Ga-DOTATOC Versus 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in Functional Imaging of Neuroendocrine Tumors , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  Young Kon Kim,et al.  Detection of Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Intraindividual Comparison of Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI at 3.0 and 1.5 T , 2011, Investigative radiology.

[8]  U. Motosugi,et al.  Distinguishing Hepatic Metastasis From Hemangioma Using Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2011, Investigative radiology.

[9]  H. Amthauer,et al.  68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT of Neuroendocrine Tumors: Spotlight on the CT Phases of a Triple-Phase Protocol , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  C. Boy,et al.  68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT and somatostatin receptor (sst1–sst5) expression in normal human tissue: correlation of sst2 mRNA and SUVmax , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[11]  J. Hornegger,et al.  Anatomische Genauigkeit der retrospektiven, automatischen und starren Bildregistrierung zwischen FDG-PET und MRI bei abdominalen Läsionen , 2011 .

[12]  J Hornegger,et al.  Anatomical accuracy of abdominal lesion localization. Retrospective automatic rigid image registration between FDG-PET and MRI. , 2011, Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine.

[13]  R. Buchert,et al.  Cost comparison of 111In-DTPA-octreotide scintigraphy and 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT for staging enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[14]  G. V. von Schulthess,et al.  Value of Retrospective Fusion of PET and MR Images in Detection of Hepatic Metastases: Comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT and Gd-EOB-DTPA–Enhanced MRI , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  Marion de Jong,et al.  Somatostatin-receptor-based imaging and therapy of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. , 2010, Endocrine-related cancer.

[16]  B. Marinček,et al.  18F-FDG-PET und MRT bei Patienten mit malignen Leber- und Pankreasläsionen – Genauigkeit der retrospektiven PET/MRI-Registrierung durch Verwendung der CT-Komponente der PET/CT , 2010 .

[17]  G. V. von Schulthess,et al.  18F-FDG-PET and MRI in patients with malignancies of the liver and pancreas , 2010, Nuklearmedizin.

[18]  H. Amthauer,et al.  Impact of Multiphase 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET/CT on Therapy Management in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors , 2009, Neuroendocrinology.

[19]  R. Bale,et al.  Bone Metastases in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumor: 68Ga-DOTA-Tyr3-Octreotide PET in Comparison to CT and Bone Scintigraphy , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[20]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Tissue Classification as a Potential Approach for Attenuation Correction in Whole-Body PET/MRI: Evaluation with PET/CT Data , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  B. Schölkopf,et al.  Towards quantitative PET/MRI: a review of MR-based attenuation correction techniques , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[22]  I. Drozdov,et al.  Neuroendocrine tumor epidemiology , 2008, Cancer.

[23]  J. Reubi,et al.  Peptide-Based Probes for Cancer Imaging , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[24]  R. Jensen,et al.  Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. , 2008, The Lancet. Oncology.

[25]  Markus Jahn,et al.  Processing of Generator-Produced 68Ga for Medical Application , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[26]  A. Runz,et al.  Comparison of 68Ga-DOTATOC PET and 111In-DTPAOC (Octreoscan) SPECT in patients with neuroendocrine tumours , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[27]  R. Felix,et al.  Impact of FDG-PET/MRI Image Fusion on the Detection of Pancreatic Cancer , 2007, Pancreatology.

[28]  T. de Baère,et al.  Detection of liver metastases from endocrine tumors: a prospective comparison of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[29]  S. Bloom,et al.  Neuroendocrine tumours. , 2014, Endocrine-related cancer.

[30]  J. Debatin,et al.  Whole-body dual-modality PET/CT and whole-body MRI for tumor staging in oncology. , 2003, JAMA.

[31]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.