The smart potential behind probability matching

[1]  J. Goodnow.  Determinants of choice-distribution in two-choice situations. , 1955, The American journal of psychology.

[2]  R. Hyman,et al.  Involvement and Set as Determinants of Behavioral Stereotypy , 1956 .

[3]  J. Yellott.  Probability learning with noncontingent success , 1969 .

[4]  Lola L. Lopes.  Doing the impossible: A note on induction and the experience of randomness. , 1982 .

[5]  A. Tversky,et al.  The hot hand in basketball: On the misperception of random sequences , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  P. Ayton,et al.  Psychological conceptions of randomness , 1989 .

[7]  W. Wagenaar,et al.  The perception of randomness , 1991 .

[8]  M. Nowak,et al.  A strategy of win-stay, lose-shift that outperforms tit-for-tat in the Prisoner's Dilemma game , 1993, Nature.

[9]  Y. Kareev.  Through a narrow window: working memory capacity and the detection of covariation , 1995, Cognition.

[10]  Y. Kareev,et al.  Through a narrow window: Sample size and the perception of correlation , 1997 .

[11]  Clifford Konold,et al.  Making Sense of Randomness " Implicit Encoding as a Basis for Judgment , 1997 .

[12]  S. Pinker.  How the Mind Works , 1999, Philosophy after Darwin.

[13]  Nir Vulkan.  An Economist's Perspective on Probability Matching , 2000 .

[14]  L. Galli-Resta,et al.  The Dynamics of Neuronal Death: A Time-Lapse Study in the Retina , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  Michael B. Miller,et al.  The Left Hemisphere's Role in Hypothesis Formation , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Is probability matching smart? Associations between probabilistic choices and cognitive ability , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[17]  G. McClelland,et al.  Negative Consequences of Dichotomizing Continuous Predictor Variables , 2003 .

[18]  Peter Ayton,et al.  The hot hand fallacy and the gambler’s fallacy: Two faces of subjective randomness? , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[19]  Michael B. Miller,et al.  Searching for patterns in random sequences. , 2004, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[20]  Michael F. Bunting,et al.  Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[21]  Richard P. Heitz,et al.  An automated version of the operation span task , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[22]  J. Rieskamp.  Positive and negative recency effects in retirement savings decisions. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[23]  Edward T. Cokely,et al.  Sources of individual differences in working memory: Contributions of strategy to capacity , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[24]  W. Gaissmaier,et al.  Simple predictions fueled by capacity limitations: when are they successful? , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[25]  A. Spencer,et al.  [Silence of the Lambs]. , 2006, Lakartidningen.

[26]  J. Unturbe,et al.  Probability matching involves rule-generating ability: a neuropsychological mechanism dealing with probabilities. , 2007, Neuropsychology.

[27]  B. Newell,et al.  The role of experience in decisions from description , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[28]  P. Todd,et al.  Environments That Make Us Smart , 2007 .

[29]  Lael J. Schooler,et al.  An ecological perspective to cognitive limits: Modeling environment-mind interactions with ACT-R , 2008, Judgment and Decision Making.

[30]  B. Newell,et al.  Biased samples not mode of presentation: Re-examining the apparent underweighting of rare events in experience-based choice , 2008 .

[31]  Marci S. DeCaro,et al.  Individual differences in category learning: Sometimes less working memory capacity is better than more , 2008, Cognition.