The effect of using a laptopstation compared to using a standard laptop PC on the cervical spine torque, perceived strain and productivity.

The objective of this study was to assess the effect of using a laptopstation and a laptop PC and how this difference in work set-up affected the mechanical load on the neck (C7-Th1 segment), the subjective evaluation of strain on the neck and productivity. Ten healthy male students at Umeå University, Sweden with an average of 10 years of PC work experience and an average of 18 months of laptop PC work experience participated in the study. For each research subject measurements were divided into two parts; sitting working at the ErgoQ laptopstation in test situation A, and sitting working at a conventional laptop PC, test situation B. Each part took 4h and was scheduled on two consecutive days. Photography and biomechanical analysis was used to calculate the torque at the neck. To examine perceived strain the Borg Scale was used and to assess performance a productivity score was calculated. The results in the study demonstrated a significant (p<0.05) difference with the use of the laptopstation resulting in decreased torque at the C7-Th1 segment, less perceived strain at the neck and a higher productivity score. In conclusion, the results of the study confirm the importance of adjustable work tools that recognize anthropometric differences and biomechanics to meet the needs of individual customers during continuous visual display terminal work.

[1]  Etienne Grandjean,et al.  Fitting the Task to the Man: A Textbook of Occupational Ergonomics , 1988 .

[2]  Raymond Lee,et al.  An ergonomic evaluation comparing desktop, notebook, and subnotebook computers. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  Susumu Saito,et al.  Effects of the liquid crystal display tilt angle of a notebook computer on posture, muscle activities and somatic complaints , 2002 .

[4]  L Straker,et al.  A comparison of the postures assumed when using laptop computers and desktop computers. , 1997, Applied ergonomics.

[5]  M. B. Villanueva,et al.  Sitting posture and neck and shoulder muscle activities at different screen height settings of the visual display terminal. , 1997, Industrial health.

[6]  Lex M Bouter,et al.  Cost-of-illness of neck pain in The Netherlands in 1996 , 1999, Pain.

[7]  M Miyao,et al.  Ergonomic evaluation of working posture of VDT operation using personal computer with flat panel display. , 1997, Industrial health.

[8]  J P Psihogios,et al.  A field evaluation of monitor placement effects in VDT users. , 2001, Applied ergonomics.

[9]  M. Horikawa,et al.  Effect of visual display terminal height on the trapezius muscle hardness: quantitative evaluation by a newly developed muscle hardness meter. , 2001, Applied ergonomics.

[10]  Alf L. Nachemson,et al.  Neck and back pain : The scientific evidence of causes, diagnosis, and treatment , 2000 .

[11]  T Wittig,et al.  Influence of screen and copy holder positions on head posture, muscle activity and user judgement. , 1998, Applied ergonomics.

[12]  Min K. Chung,et al.  Ergonomic analysis of musculoskeletal discomforts among conversational VDT operators , 1997 .

[13]  A Kilbom,et al.  Work technique and its consequences for musculoskeletal disorders. , 1987, Ergonomics.

[14]  Susumu Saito,et al.  Ergonomic Guidelines for Using Notebook Personal Computers , 1998 .

[15]  Leon Straker,et al.  Survey of physical ergonomics issues associated with school childrens’ use of laptop computers , 2000 .