Constructing safety: System designs, system effects, and the play of heterogeneous interests in a behavioral health care setting

OBJECTIVE This paper considers the utility of actor-network theory as a basis for uncovering the mutual interdependencies between system design and system impact in an evolving project, and for exploring the implications that these interdependencies hold for the production of safety in behavioral health care. METHODS Drawing on a field study of a systems project in a human-services firm, the paper applies key concepts from actor-network theory in the analysis of a design crisis that emerged during the course of the project. RESULTS Actor-network theory provides a compelling framework in this situation for identifying the diverse interests involved, revealing their complex interactions, and illuminating the importance of the emerging system as an organizational actor in its own right. CONCLUSION Actor-network theory shows promise for use in other analyses concerned with the role of information technology in the construction of safety in health care settings.

[1]  M. Callon Techno-economic Networks and Irreversibility , 1990 .

[2]  M. Callon Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay , 1984 .

[3]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[4]  Stephanie Watts,et al.  Contested artifact: technology sensemaking, actor networks, and the shaping of the Web browser , 2004, Inf. Technol. People.

[5]  Richard Vidgen,et al.  Boxes, Non-Human Stakeholders and the Translation of IT Through Mediation , 1996 .

[6]  Tor Hernes,et al.  Actor-network theory and organizing , 2005 .

[7]  Edgar A. Whitley,et al.  Understanding participation in entrepreneurial organizations: some hermeneutic readings , 1999, J. Inf. Technol..

[8]  G. Walsham Actor-network theory and IS research: current status and future prospects , 1997 .

[9]  R. Boland Phenomenology: a preferred approach to research on information systems , 1986, Trends in Information Systems.

[10]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .

[11]  J. Law A Sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology, and domination , 1991 .

[12]  R. Baskerville,et al.  Organizational and Social Perspectives on Information Technology , 2013, IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing.

[13]  Athanasia Pouloudi,et al.  Studying the Translations of NHSnet , 2001, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[14]  K. Knorr-Cetina,et al.  Advances in social theory and methodology : toward an integration of micro- and macro-sociologies , 1981 .

[15]  Ole Hanseth,et al.  Implementing Open Network Technologies in Complex Work Practices: A Case from Telemedicine , 2000, Organizational and Social Perspectives on IT.

[16]  K. Sheehan Online Research Methodology* , 2002 .

[17]  Ralf Klischewski,et al.  Reaching out for Commitments: Systems Development as Networking , 2002, Social Thinking - Software Practice.

[18]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  The Emergence of Interpretivism in IS Research , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[19]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Theorizing about Standardization: Integrating Fragments of Process Theory in Light of Telecommunication Standardization Wars , 2008 .

[20]  Saharon Shelah,et al.  Black Boxes , 2008, 0812.0656.

[21]  Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi,et al.  P ERSPECTIVE M AKING AND P ERSPECTIVE T AKING IN C OMMUNITIES OF K NOWING , 2000 .

[22]  O. Hanseth,et al.  From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures , 2000 .

[23]  Ulrike Schultze,et al.  From Work to Activity: Technology and the Narrative of Progress , 1996 .

[24]  Bill Doolin,et al.  To reveal is to critique: actor–network theory and critical information systems research , 2002, J. Inf. Technol..

[25]  Ramiro Montealegre,et al.  Trojan actor-networks and swift translation: Bringing actor-network theory to IT project escalation studies , 2004, Inf. Technol. People.

[26]  Edgar A. Whitley Understanding participation in entrepreneurial organisations: applying the sociology of translation , 1998, ECIS.

[27]  Marc Berg,et al.  The nature of the Net: constructing reliability of health information on the Web , 2004, Inf. Technol. People.

[28]  Geoffrey C. Bowker,et al.  Infrastructure and Organizational Transformation: Classifying Nurses’ Work , 1996 .

[29]  B. Latour,et al.  Power, Action and Belief. A New Sociology of Knowledge? , 1986 .

[30]  Jonathan P. Allen Redefining the network: enrollment strategies in the PDA industry , 2004, Inf. Technol. People.

[31]  Marc Berg,et al.  Guest editors' introduction: Actor-network theory and information systems. What's so special? , 2004, Inf. Technol. People.

[32]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations , 1993 .

[33]  Allen S. Lee,et al.  Information systems and qualitative research , 1997 .

[34]  Melanie Wilson,et al.  Making nursing visible? Gender, technology and the care plan as script , 2002, Inf. Technol. People.

[35]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Information Technology and Changes in Organizational Work , 1996, IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology.

[36]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  GIS for District-Level Administration in India: Problems and Opportunities , 1999, MIS Q..

[37]  B. Latour Technology is Society Made Durable , 1990 .

[38]  J. Carroll Organizational Learning Activities in High‐hazard Industries: The Logics Underlying Self‐Analysis , 1998 .

[39]  Henrik C. J. Linderoth Fiery spirits and supporting programs of action: keys to exploration and exploitation of open technologies , 2002 .

[40]  Howard Goldstein,et al.  What's So Special? , 1999 .

[41]  Guy Fitzgerald,et al.  Research methods in information systems , 1985 .

[42]  Ole Hanseth,et al.  Actor-network theory and information systems , 2004 .

[43]  Eric Monteiro,et al.  Inscribing behaviour in information infrastructure standards , 1997 .

[44]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[45]  Bruno Latour,et al.  Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy , 1999 .

[46]  K. Mcgrath,et al.  The Golden Circle: a way of arguing and acting about technology in the London Ambulance Service , 2002, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[47]  Noortje Marres,et al.  Tracing the trajectories of issues, and their democratic deficits, on the Web: The case of the Development Gateway and its doubles , 2004, Inf. Technol. People.

[48]  Matthew R. Jones,et al.  Information systems and the double mangle: steering a course between the Scylla of embedded structure and the Charybdis of strong symmetry , 1998 .

[49]  Davide Nicolini,et al.  Learning In a Constellation of Interconnected Practices: Canon or Dissonance? , 2002 .