Soft Robotics: The Next Generation of Intelligent Machines

There has been an increasing interest in applying biological principles to the design and control of robots. Unlike industrial robots that are programmed to execute a rather limited number of tasks, the new generation of bio-inspired robots is expected to display a wide range of behaviours in unpredictable environments, as well as to interact safely and smoothly with human co-workers. In this article, we put forward some of the properties that will characterize these new robots: soft materials, flexible and stretchable sensors, modular and efficient actuators, self-organization and distributed control. We introduce a number of design principles; in particular, we try to comprehend the novel design space that now includes soft materials and requires a completely different way of thinking about control. We also introduce a recent case study of developing a complex humanoid robot, discuss the lessons learned and speculate about future challenges and perspectives.

[1]  B Mazzolai,et al.  Soft robotic arm inspired by the octopus: I. From biological functions to artificial requirements , 2012, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[2]  Andy Ruina,et al.  DESIGN AND CONTROL OF RANGER: AN ENERGY-EFFICIENT, DYNAMIC WALKING ROBOT , 2012 .

[3]  J. Altman,et al.  JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY , 2005 .

[4]  B Mazzolai,et al.  Soft-robotic arm inspired by the octopus: II. From artificial requirements to innovative technological solutions , 2012, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[5]  MahadevanSridhar,et al.  Recent Advances in Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning , 2003 .

[6]  Kikuo Fujimura,et al.  The intelligent ASIMO: system overview and integration , 2002, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[7]  R. Pfeifer,et al.  Morphological computation for adaptive behavior and cognition , 2006 .

[8]  Giulio Sandini,et al.  Developmental robotics: a survey , 2003, Connect. Sci..

[9]  J. Dewey.  The Reflex Arc Concept in Psychology , 2011 .

[10]  Sylvia Weir,et al.  Action perception , 1974 .

[11]  Xiaoqin Wang,et al.  Remodelling of hand representation in adult cortex determined by timing of tactile stimulation , 1995, Nature.

[12]  R. Pfeifer,et al.  Self-Organization, Embodiment, and Biologically Inspired Robotics , 2007, Science.

[13]  Sridhar Mahadevan,et al.  Recent Advances in Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning , 2003, Discret. Event Dyn. Syst..

[14]  Rob Knight,et al.  The Anthropomimetic Principle , 2006 .

[15]  Masaki Ogino,et al.  Cognitive Developmental Robotics: A Survey , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development.

[16]  PfeiferRolf,et al.  The challenges ahead for bio-inspired 'soft' robotics , 2012 .

[17]  Rolf Pfeifer,et al.  How the Body Shapes the Way We Think: A New View of Intelligence (Bradford Books) , 2006 .

[18]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Psychological Review , 2003 .

[19]  Mark L Latash,et al.  Evolution of Motor Control: From Reflexes and Motor Programs to the Equilibrium-Point Hypothesis , 2008, Journal of human kinetics.

[20]  Fumiya Iida,et al.  Soft Robotics: Challenges and Perspectives , 2011, FET.

[21]  Terence D. Sanger,et al.  Optimal unsupervised motor learning for dimensionality reduction of nonlinear control systems , 1994, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[22]  Chrystopher L. Nehaniv,et al.  From unknown sensors and actuators to actions grounded in sensorimotor perceptions , 2006, Connect. Sci..

[23]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Autonomous Mental Development by Robots and Animals , 2001, Science.

[24]  Fumiya Iida,et al.  Self-organization of reflexive behavior from spontaneous motor activity , 2012, Biological Cybernetics.

[25]  Masayuki Inaba,et al.  Development of musculoskeletal humanoid Kotaro , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[26]  Rolf Pfeifer,et al.  How the body shapes the way we think - a new view on intelligence , 2006 .

[27]  R. Held,et al.  MOVEMENT-PRODUCED STIMULATION IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF VISUALLY GUIDED BEHAVIOR. , 1963, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[28]  Rob Knight,et al.  ECCE1: The first of a series of anthropomimetic musculoskeletal upper torsos , 2010, 2010 10th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[29]  Verzekeren Naar Sparen,et al.  Cambridge , 1969, Humphrey Burton: In My Own Time.

[30]  Fumiya Iida,et al.  The challenges ahead for bio-inspired 'soft' robotics , 2012, CACM.

[31]  Heinrich M. Jaeger,et al.  Universal robotic gripper based on the jamming of granular material , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  Soft robotics , 2008, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[33]  Pranav A. Bhounsule,et al.  Cornell Ranger : Implementing energy-optimal trajectory control using low information , reflex-based control , 2012 .

[34]  A. Noë,et al.  A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[35]  Alessandra Angelucci,et al.  Induction of visual orientation modules in auditory cortex , 2000, Nature.

[36]  Yasuo Kuniyoshi,et al.  Information transfer at multiple scales. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[37]  E. Guizzo,et al.  The rise of the robot worker , 2012, IEEE Spectrum.

[38]  N. A. Bernshteĭn.  The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1967 .

[39]  Masayuki Inaba,et al.  An advanced musculoskeletal humanoid Kojiro , 2007, 2007 7th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.