Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab or paclitaxel as first-line treatment for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in a multicenter national observational study.

BACKGROUND Bevacizumab combined with paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy for patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has led to mixed results in randomized trials, with an improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) but no statistically significant overall survival (OS) benefit. Real-life data could help in assessing the value of this combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS This study aimed to describe the outcome following first-line paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab in the French Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) database of MBC patients, established in 2014 by Unicancer. The primary and secondary end points were OS and PFS, respectively. RESULTS From 2008 to 2013, 14 014 MBC patient files were identified, including 10 605 patients with a HER2-negative status. Of these, 3426 received paclitaxel and bevacizumab (2127) or paclitaxel (1299) as first-line chemotherapy. OS adjusted for major prognostic factors was significantly longer in the paclitaxel and bevacizumab group compared with paclitaxel [hazard ratio (HR) 0.672, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.601-0.752; median survival time 27.7 versus 19.8 months]. Results were consistent in all supportive analyses (using a propensity score for adjustment and as a matching factor for nested case-control analyses) and sensitivity analyses. Similar results were observed for the adjusted PFS, favoring the combination (HR 0.739, 95% CI 0.672-0.813; 8.1 versus 6.4 months). CONCLUSIONS In this large-scale, real-life setting, patients with HER2-negative MBC who received paclitaxel plus bevacizumab as first-line chemotherapy had a significantly better OS and PFS than those receiving paclitaxel. Despite robust methodology, real-life data are exposed to important potential biases, and therefore, results need to be treated with caution. Our data cannot therefore support extension of current use of bevacizumab in MBC.

[1]  R. Greil,et al.  1800 Final results for overall survival (OS), the primary endpoint of the CECOG TURANDOT prospective randomised trial evaluating bevacizumab-paclitaxel (BEV-PAC) vs BEV-capecitabine (CAP) for HER2-negative locally recurrent/metastatic breast cancer (LR/mBC) , 2015 .

[2]  D. Miles,et al.  1866 First results from the double-blind placebo (PL)-controlled randomised phase III MERiDiAN trial prospectively evaluating plasma (p)VEGF-A in patients (pts) receiving first-line paclitaxel (PAC) +/- bevacizumab (BV) for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC) , 2015 .

[3]  V. Prasad,et al.  The Strength of Association Between Surrogate End Points and Survival in Oncology: A Systematic Review of Trial-Level Meta-analyses. , 2015, JAMA internal medicine.

[4]  Sung-Bae Kim,et al.  Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  D. Doval,et al.  Maintenance capecitabine and bevacizumab versus bevacizumab alone after initial first-line bevacizumab and docetaxel for patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (IMELDA): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[6]  X. Pivot,et al.  A prognostic factor index for overall survival in patients receiving first-line chemotherapy for HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: an analysis of the ATHENA trial. , 2014, Breast.

[7]  M. Piccart,et al.  ESO-ESMO 2nd international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC2)† , 2014, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[8]  Sung-Bae Kim,et al.  Phase III, multicenter, randomized trial of maintenance chemotherapy versus observation in patients with metastatic breast cancer after achieving disease control with six cycles of gemcitabine plus paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy: KCSG-BR07-02. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  M. Piccart-Gebhart,et al.  Bevacizumab and Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of First-Line Phase III Studies and a Critical Reappraisal of Available Evidence , 2012, Journal of oncology.

[10]  Xian Zhou,et al.  RIBBON-1: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  Arlene Chan,et al.  Phase III study of bevacizumab plus docetaxel compared with placebo plus docetaxel for the first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  Kristine R Broglio,et al.  Detecting an overall survival benefit that is derived from progression-free survival. , 2009, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[13]  M. Epstein,et al.  Guidelines for good pharmacoepidemiology practices (GPP) , 2008 .

[14]  E. Perez,et al.  Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab versus paclitaxel alone for metastatic breast cancer. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  N. Ferrara.  Vascular endothelial growth factor as a target for anticancer therapy. , 2004, The oncologist.

[16]  M Schemper,et al.  A note on quantifying follow-up in studies of failure time. , 1996, Controlled clinical trials.

[17]  David R. Cox,et al.  Regression models and life tables (with discussion , 1972 .