Atom depth as a descriptor of the protein interior.

Atom depth, defined as the distance (dpx, A) of a nonhydrogen atom from its closest solvent-accessible protein neighbor, provides a simple but precise description of the protein interior. Mean residue depths can be easily computed and are very sensitive to structural features. From the analysis of the average and maximum atom depths of a set of 136 protein structures, we derive a limit of approximately 200 residues for protein and protein domain size. The average and maximum atom depths in a protein are related to its size but not to the fold type. From the same set of structures, we calculated the mean residue depths for the 20 amino acid types, and show that they correlate well with hydrophobicity scales. We show that dpx values can be used to partition atoms in discrete layers according to their depth and to identify atoms that, although buried, are potential targets for posttranslational modifications like phosphorylation. Finally, we find a correlation between highly conserved residues in structural neighbors of the same fold type, and their mean residue depth in the reference structure.

[1]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Favorable domain size in proteins. , 1998, Folding & design.

[2]  U. Hobohm,et al.  Enlarged representative set of protein structures , 1994, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[3]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen‐bonded and geometrical features , 1983, Biopolymers.

[4]  S. Pongor,et al.  Protein fold similarity estimated by a probabilistic approach based on Cα-Cα distance comparison , 2002 .

[5]  F M Poulsen,et al.  A nuclear magnetic resonance study of the hydrogen-exchange behaviour of lysozyme in crystals and solution. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[6]  M J Sippl,et al.  Structure-derived hydrophobic potential. Hydrophobic potential derived from X-ray structures of globular proteins is able to identify native folds. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  R. Doolittle,et al.  A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  Frances M. G. Pearl,et al.  The CATH protein family database: A resource for structural and functional annotation of genomes , 2002, Proteomics.

[9]  Stephen H. Bryant,et al.  Domain size distributions can predict domain boundaries , 2000, Bioinform..

[10]  J. Janin,et al.  Surface and inside volumes in globular proteins , 1979, Nature.

[11]  William R. Taylor,et al.  An ellipsoidal approximation of protein shape , 1983 .

[12]  B. Lee,et al.  The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. , 1971, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  R. Sharma,et al.  Mechanistic studies on rhodopsin kinase. Light-dependent phosphorylation of C-terminal peptides of rhodopsin. , 1992, European journal of biochemistry.

[14]  K. B. Ward,et al.  Occluded molecular surface: Analysis of protein packing , 1995, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[15]  V. Erdmann,et al.  Prokaryotic elongation factor Tu is phosphorylated in vivo. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[16]  C. Sander,et al.  Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  Oliviero Carugo,et al.  DPX: for the analysis of the protein core , 2003, Bioinform..

[18]  S. Pongor,et al.  Protein fold similarity estimated by a probabilistic approach based on C(alpha)-C(alpha) distance comparison. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  F M Richards,et al.  Protein packing: dependence on protein size, secondary structure and amino acid composition. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  J. Behlke,et al.  Autophosphorylation-inactivation site of hexokinase 2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[21]  R. Tjian,et al.  Structure and function of a human TAFII250 double bromodomain module. , 2000, Science.

[22]  D. Eisenberg,et al.  Analysis of membrane and surface protein sequences with the hydrophobic moment plot. , 1984, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  D. Eisenberg,et al.  Correlation of sequence hydrophobicities measures similarity in three-dimensional protein structure. , 1983, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  J. Hurley,et al.  Mass spectrometric analysis of the kinetics of in vivo rhodopsin phosphorylation , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[25]  R. Varadarajan,et al.  Residue depth: a novel parameter for the analysis of protein structure and stability. , 1999, Structure.

[26]  Oliviero Carugo,et al.  CX, an algorithm that identifies protruding atoms in proteins , 2002, Bioinform..

[27]  C Sander,et al.  Mapping the Protein Universe , 1996, Science.

[28]  C. Chothia The nature of the accessible and buried surfaces in proteins. , 1976, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  N. Blom,et al.  Sequence and structure-based prediction of eukaryotic protein phosphorylation sites. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[30]  L. Mirny,et al.  Universally conserved positions in protein folds: reading evolutionary signals about stability, folding kinetics and function. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.