Gaining comparative advantage through discretionary expenditures: the returns to R&D and advertising

We explore the extent to which R&D and advertising expenditures generate a comparative advantage that allows firms to earn supranormal profits. After controlling for unobserved firm-specific factors and the feedback between discretionary expenditures and profitability, our results suggest substantially lower accounting and stock market returns to R&D and advertising than indicated in previous research. Isolating mechanisms, which prevent imitation, do not appear sufficient for either R&D or advertising expenditures to generate, on the average, a long-run comparative advantage.

[1]  R. Solow.  TECHNICAL CHANGE AND THE AGGREGATE PRODUCTION FUNCTION , 1957 .

[2]  Oscar S. Gellein,et al.  Accounting for research and development expenditures , 1965 .

[3]  R. Ball,et al.  An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers , 1968 .

[4]  F. Scherer,et al.  Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. , 1971 .

[5]  H. Demsetz.  Industry Structure, Market Rivalry, and Public Policy , 1973, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[6]  Richard M. Helmer,et al.  An Exposition of the Box-Jenkins Transfer Function Analysis with an Application to the Advertising-Sales Relationship , 1977 .

[7]  J. Hausman.  Specification tests in econometrics , 1978 .

[8]  Dennis C. Mueller,et al.  Industrial Research and Development, Intangible Capital Stocks, and Firm Profit Rates , 1978 .

[9]  Stephen Martin.  Advertising, Concentration, and Profitability: The Simultaneity Problem , 1979 .

[10]  Ariel Pakes,et al.  An Exploration into the Determinants of Research Intensity , 1980 .

[11]  Jerry A. Hausman,et al.  Panel Data and Unobservable Individual Effects , 1981 .

[12]  G. Erickson,et al.  Using Ridge Regression to Estimate Directly Lagged Effects in Marketing , 1981 .

[13]  E. Mansfield,et al.  Imitation Costs and Patents: An Empirical Study , 1981 .

[14]  Z. Griliches.  Market Value, R&D, and Patents , 1981 .

[15]  Robin Wensley,et al.  PIMS and BCG: New horizons or false dawn? , 1982 .

[16]  Cheng Hsiao,et al.  Formulation and estimation of dynamic models using panel data , 1982 .

[17]  U. Ben-Zion.  The R&D and Investment Decision and Its Relationship to the Firm's Market Value: Some Preliminary Results , 1984 .

[18]  M. Salinger.  Tobin's q, Unionization, and the Concentration-Profits Relationship , 1984 .

[19]  Robert A. Connolly,et al.  R&D, Market Structure, and Profits: A Value-Based Approach , 1984 .

[20]  Lorne N. Switzer,et al.  The Determinants of Industrial R&D: A Funds Flow Simultaneous Equation Approach , 1984 .

[21]  Merton H. Miller,et al.  Dividend Policy under Asymmetric Information , 1985 .

[22]  G. Benston.  The Validity of Studies with Line of Business Data: Reply [The Validity of Profits-Structure Studies with Particular Reference to the FTC's Line of Business Data] , 1985 .

[23]  A. Jaffe.  Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms&Apos; Patents, Profits and Market Value , 1986 .

[24]  Cheng Hsiao,et al.  Analysis of Panel Data , 1987 .

[25]  J. Barney.  Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy , 1986 .

[26]  Ambar G. Rao,et al.  Modeling Response to Advertising and Pricing Changes for “V-8” Cocktail Vegetable Juice , 1986 .

[27]  S. Winter.  Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets , 1987 .

[28]  C. Shapiro,et al.  R&D Rivalry with Licensing or Imitation , 1987 .

[29]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .

[30]  Nick von Tunzelmann,et al.  Patents and productivity: (The University of Chicago Press, 1984) pp. 512, [UK pound]15.25. (paperback edition, 1987.) , 1989 .

[31]  J. Farley,et al.  Determinants of Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 1990 .

[32]  R. Jacobson.  Unobservable Effects and Business Performance , 1990 .

[33]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .