Contributions of monocular and binocular cues to distance discrimination in natural scenes

Little is known about distance discrimination in real scenes, especially at long distances. This is not surprising given the logistical difficulties of making such measurements. To circumvent these difficulties, we collected 81 stereo images of outdoor scenes, together with precisely registered range images that provided the ground-truth distance at each pixel location. We then presented the stereo images in the correct viewing geometry and measured the ability of human subjects to discriminate the distance between locations in the scene, as a function of absolute distance (3 m to 30 m) and the angular spacing between the locations being compared (2°, 5°, and 10°). Measurements were made for binocular and monocular viewing. Thresholds for binocular viewing were quite small at all distances (Weber fractions less than 1% at 2° spacing and less than 4% at 10° spacing). Thresholds for monocular viewing were higher than those for binocular viewing out to distances of 15–20 m, beyond which they were the same. Using standard cue-combination analysis, we also estimated what the thresholds would be based on binocular-stereo cues alone. With two exceptions, we show that the entire pattern of results is consistent with what one would expect from classical studies of binocular disparity thresholds and separation/size discrimination thresholds measured with simple laboratory stimuli. The first exception is some deviation from the expected pattern at close distances (especially for monocular viewing). The second exception is that thresholds in natural scenes are lower, presumably because of the rich figural cues contained in natural images.

[1]  E. Gibson,et al.  The effect of training on absolute estimation of distance over the ground. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  Julie M. Harris,et al.  Stereoscopic perception of real depths at large distances. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[3]  Peter Willemsen,et al.  Does the Quality of the Computer Graphics Matter when Judging Distances in Visually Immersive Environments? , 2004, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[4]  Kenneth N. Ogle,et al.  Stereoscopic Acuity and the Role of Convergence , 1956 .

[5]  C. Blakemore.  The range and scope of binocular depth discrimination in man , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Limited Field of View of Head-Mounted Displays Is Not the Cause of Distance Underestimation in Virtual Environments , 2004, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[7]  A. Yuille,et al.  Object perception as Bayesian inference. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[8]  Elia Vecellio,et al.  Binocular depth discrimination and estimation beyond interaction space. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[9]  Barbara Gillam,et al.  The Perception of Spatial Layout from Static Optical Information , 1995 .

[10]  J. Philbeck,et al.  Comparison of two indicators of perceived egocentric distance under full-cue and reduced-cue conditions. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Terrain influences the accurate judgement of distance , 1998, Nature.

[12]  Jeanine Stefanucci,et al.  Egocentric distance perception in the Oculus Rift (DK2) , 2015, SAP.

[13]  Timothy P. McNamara,et al.  Egocentric distance perception in real and HMD-based virtual environments: the effect of limited scanning method , 2011, APGV '11.

[14]  E. Gibson,et al.  The effect of prior training with a scale of distance on absolute and relative judgments of distance over ground. , 1955, Journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  J Hirsch,et al.  Limits of spatial-frequency discrimination as evidence of neural interpolation. , 1982, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[16]  Johannes Burge,et al.  Defocus blur discrimination in natural images with natural optics. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[17]  W. Geisler,et al.  Contributions of ideal observer theory to vision research , 2011, Vision Research.

[18]  Teng Leng Ooi,et al.  The visible ground surface as a reference frame for scaling binocular depth of a target in midair. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  William Bialek,et al.  Statistics of Natural Images: Scaling in the Woods , 1993, NIPS.

[20]  E. Gibson,et al.  Distance judgment by the method of fractionation. , 1955, Journal of experimental psychology.

[21]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Inaccurate Representation of the Ground Surface beyond a Texture Boundary , 2007, Perception.

[22]  Mark Mon-Williams,et al.  Binocular Virtual Reality Displays: When Problems Do and Don't Occur , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[23]  Mark Mon-Williams,et al.  Natural problems for stereoscopic depth perception in virtual environments , 1995, Vision Research.

[24]  S. McKee,et al.  Spatial configurations for visual hyperacuity , 1977, Vision Research.

[25]  J. Lappin,et al.  Environmental context influences visually perceived distance , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  Terry Caelli,et al.  Discrimination thresholds in the two-dimensional spatial frequency domain , 1983, Vision Research.

[27]  Brian C. McCann,et al.  Estimating 3D tilt from local image cues in natural scenes , 2016, Journal of vision.

[28]  J. Saunders,et al.  Do humans optimally integrate stereo and texture information for judgments of surface slant? , 2003, Vision Research.

[29]  Alfred H. Holway,et al.  Determinants of Apparent Visual Size with Distance Variant , 1941 .

[30]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Space perception of strabismic observers in the real world environment. , 2015, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[31]  H A Sedgwick,et al.  Distance perception mediated through nested contact relations among surfaces , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Judging Egocentric Distance on the Ground: Occlusion and Surface Integration , 2004, Perception.

[33]  Daniel L. Ruderman,et al.  Origins of scaling in natural images , 1996, Vision Research.

[34]  D Regan,et al.  Independence of orientation and size in spatial discriminations. , 1983, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[35]  M. Landy,et al.  Weighted linear cue combination with possibly correlated error , 2003, Vision Research.

[36]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Perceiving distance accurately by a directional process of integrating ground information , 2004, Nature.

[37]  S. McKee,et al.  The precision of binocular and monocular depth judgments in natural settings. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[38]  Shojiro Nagata,et al.  How to reinforce perception of depth in single two-dimensional pictures , 1991 .

[39]  R. Hetherington.  The Perception of the Visual World , 1952 .

[40]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  The effects of contrast on visual orientation and spatial frequency discrimination: a comparison of single cells and behavior. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  S S Fukusima,et al.  Visual perception of egocentric distance as assessed by triangulation. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  Peter Willemsen,et al.  The Influence of Restricted Viewing Conditions on Egocentric Distance Perception: Implications for Real and Virtual Indoor Environments , 2005, Perception.

[43]  G. J. Burton,et al.  Color and spatial structure in natural scenes. , 1987, Applied optics.

[44]  Yang Liu,et al.  Disparity statistics in natural scenes. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[45]  D J Field,et al.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[46]  W. Geisler.  Visual perception and the statistical properties of natural scenes. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[47]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[48]  J. Loomis,et al.  Visual space perception and visually directed action. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.