Evaluation of artificial neural network algorithms for predicting METs and activity type from accelerometer data: validation on an independent sample.

Previous work from our laboratory provided a "proof of concept" for use of artificial neural networks (nnets) to estimate metabolic equivalents (METs) and identify activity type from accelerometer data (Staudenmayer J, Pober D, Crouter S, Bassett D, Freedson P, J Appl Physiol 107: 1330-1307, 2009). The purpose of this study was to develop new nnets based on a larger, more diverse, training data set and apply these nnet prediction models to an independent sample to evaluate the robustness and flexibility of this machine-learning modeling technique. The nnet training data set (University of Massachusetts) included 277 participants who each completed 11 activities. The independent validation sample (n = 65) (University of Tennessee) completed one of three activity routines. Criterion measures were 1) measured METs assessed using open-circuit indirect calorimetry; and 2) observed activity to identify activity type. The nnet input variables included five accelerometer count distribution features and the lag-1 autocorrelation. The bias and root mean square errors for the nnet MET trained on University of Massachusetts and applied to University of Tennessee were +0.32 and 1.90 METs, respectively. Seventy-seven percent of the activities were correctly classified as sedentary/light, moderate, or vigorous intensity. For activity type, household and locomotion activities were correctly classified by the nnet activity type 98.1 and 89.5% of the time, respectively, and sport was correctly classified 23.7% of the time. Use of this machine-learning technique operates reasonably well when applied to an independent sample. We propose the creation of an open-access activity dictionary, including accelerometer data from a broad array of activities, leading to further improvements in prediction accuracy for METs, activity intensity, and activity type.

[1]  J. Staudenmayer,et al.  Comparison of the ActiGraph 7164 and the ActiGraph GT1M during self-paced locomotion. , 2010, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[2]  John Staudenmayer,et al.  An artificial neural network to estimate physical activity energy expenditure and identify physical activity type from an accelerometer. , 2009, Journal of applied physiology.

[3]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  A Hybrid Discriminative/Generative Approach for Modeling Human Activities , 2005, IJCAI.

[4]  Kate Lyden,et al.  Accelerometer output and MET values of common physical activities. , 2010, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[5]  Leena Choi,et al.  Validity of Physical Activity Intensity Predictions by ActiGraph, Actical, and RT3 Accelerometers , 2008, Obesity.

[6]  C Perret,et al.  Validation of a new portable ergospirometric device (Oxycon Mobile) during exercise. , 2006, International journal of sports medicine.

[7]  J. Staudenmayer,et al.  Development of novel techniques to classify physical activity mode using accelerometers. , 2006, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[8]  Charles E Matthew,et al.  Calibration of accelerometer output for adults. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[9]  Scott E Crouter,et al.  A novel method for using accelerometer data to predict energy expenditure. , 2006, Journal of applied physiology.

[10]  B E Ainsworth,et al.  Validity of four motion sensors in measuring moderate intensity physical activity. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[11]  Francisca Galindo Garre,et al.  Evaluation of neural networks to identify types of activity using accelerometers. , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[12]  J. Staudenmayer,et al.  Validation of wearable monitors for assessing sedentary behavior. , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[13]  P S Freedson,et al.  Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. , 1998, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[14]  B E Ainsworth,et al.  Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[15]  Kenneth Meijer,et al.  Activity identification using body-mounted sensors—a review of classification techniques , 2009, Physiological measurement.

[16]  Stephen S. Intille,et al.  Using wearable activity type detection to improve physical activity energy expenditure estimation , 2010, UbiComp.

[17]  Maurice R Puyau,et al.  Validation of cross-sectional time series and multivariate adaptive regression splines models for the prediction of energy expenditure in children and adolescents using doubly labeled water. , 2010, The Journal of nutrition.

[18]  B. Ainsworth,et al.  Estimation of energy expenditure using CSA accelerometers at hip and wrist sites. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[19]  Patty S. Freedson,et al.  A comprehensive evaluation of commonly used accelerometer energy expenditure and MET prediction equations , 2011, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[20]  Mike Y. Chen,et al.  Tracking Free-Weight Exercises , 2007, UbiComp.

[21]  Kong Y Chen,et al.  An artificial neural network model of energy expenditure using nonintegrated acceleration signals. , 2007, Journal of applied physiology.

[22]  P. Freedson,et al.  Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors in the United States, 2003-2004. , 2008, American journal of epidemiology.