Aggregation of unbalanced fuzzy linguistic information in decision problems based on Type-1 OWA operator

Information aggregation is a key task in any group decision making problem. In the fuzzy linguistic context, when comparing two alternatives, it is usually assumed that assessments belong to linguistic term sets of symmetrically distributed labels with respect to a central label that stands for the indifference state. However, in practice there are many situations whose nature recommends their modelling using not symmetric linguistic term sets, and therefore formal approaches to deal with sets of unbalanced linguistic labels in decision making are necessary to be appropriately developed. In literature, the linguistic hierarchy methodology has proved successful when modelling unbalanced linguistic labels using an ordinal approach in their representation. However, linguistic labels can be modelled using a cardinal approach, i.e. as fuzzy subsets represented by membership functions. Obviously, the linguistic hierarchy methodology is not appropriate in these cases. In this contribution, a Type-1 OWA approach is proposed to deal with the aggregation step of the resolution process of a group decision making problem with unbalanced linguistic information modelled using a cardinal approach. The Type-1 OWA operator aggregates fuzzy sets and uses whole membership functions to compute the aggregated output fuzzy sets. The application of the Type-1 OWA approach to an example where the linguistic hierarchy approach was applied before will provide us an opportunity to compare the aggregated results obtained in both cases. Following the defuzzification of the Type-1 OWA aggregated values, it can be concluded that both methodologies are equivalent. The use of the Type-1 OWA approach in this decision making context does not require building linguistic hierarchies while at the same time allows a fully exploitation of the fuzzy nature of linguistic information.

[1]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Connecting the numerical scale model to the unbalanced linguistic term sets , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE).

[2]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A model based on linguistic 2-tuples for dealing with multigranular hierarchical linguistic contexts in multi-expert decision-making , 2001, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B.

[3]  Robert Ivor John,et al.  Alpha-Level Aggregation: A Practical Approach to Type-1 OWA Operation for Aggregating Uncertain Information with Applications to Breast Cancer Treatments , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[4]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  The 2-Tuple Linguistic Computational Model. Advantages of Its Linguistic Description, Accuracy and Consistency , 2001, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[5]  Yin-Feng Xu,et al.  Computing the Numerical Scale of the Linguistic Term Set for the 2-Tuple Fuzzy Linguistic Representation Model , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[6]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A Fuzzy Linguistic Methodology to Deal With Unbalanced Linguistic Term Sets , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[7]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  A model of an information retrieval system with unbalanced fuzzy linguistic information , 2007, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[8]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  OWA aggregation over a continuous interval argument with applications to decision making , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[9]  Robert Ivor John,et al.  Type-1 OWA operators for aggregating uncertain information with uncertain weights induced by type-2 linguistic quantifiers , 2008, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[10]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Outline of a New Approach to the Analysis of Complex Systems and Decision Processes , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[11]  Francisco Chiclana,et al.  Type‐Reduction of General Type‐2 Fuzzy Sets: The Type‐1 OWA Approach , 2013, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[12]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-III , 1975, Inf. Sci..

[13]  József Mezei,et al.  How different are ranking methods for fuzzy numbers? A numerical study , 2013, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[14]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words , 2000, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[15]  Luis Martínez-López,et al.  AN EXTENDED HIERARCHICAL LINGUISTIC MODEL FOR DECISION‐MAKING PROBLEMS , 2011, Comput. Intell..

[16]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision-making , 1988 .

[17]  Francisco Chiclana,et al.  Linguistic majorities with difference in support , 2014, Appl. Soft Comput..

[18]  Macarena Espinilla,et al.  Optimizing the Method for Building an Extended Linguistic Hierarchy , 2009, 2009 Ninth International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications.

[19]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Linguistic modeling by hierarchical systems of linguistic rules , 2002, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[20]  Francisco Chiclana,et al.  Type-1 OWA methodology to consensus reaching processes in multi-granular linguistic contexts , 2014, Knowl. Based Syst..

[21]  L. A. ZADEH,et al.  The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning - I , 1975, Inf. Sci..

[22]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking , 1988, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[23]  Piero P. Bonissone,et al.  Selecting Uncertainty Calculi and Granularity: An Experiment in Trading-off Precision and Complexity , 1985, UAI.