Forensic advisors (FA) at the National Institute for Criminalistics and Criminology (NICC), generalists in forensic science, act as an advising body to the magistrate to improve communication between the various parties involved in the investigation: magistrate, police and crime scene investigators, and forensic experts. Their role is manifold, but their main objectives are to optimise trace processing by selecting the most pertinent traces in the context of the case and by advising magistrates on the feasibility of forensic analyses in particular circumstances in regards to the latest technical advances. Despite the absence of a legal framework governing their role and involvement in judicial cases, the demand for their services has increased over the years. Initially, forensic advisors were called for complex homicide cases. Due to the proximity with the Public Prosecutor's Office, the types of offences for which their expertise was sought have become more diverse (mainly including robbery, burglary and sexual assault cases), leading to a diversity in the types of cases handled by the forensic advisors (complex, simple and review). In many of the cases they are requested for, in addition to consulting on the best analytical strategy, forensic advisors also assume the role of case coordinator regarding the seized objects and their respective analyses. Indeed, in the majority of cases treated by the FAs, two or more types of expertise have been requested and performed, either at the internal laboratories of NICC or at external laboratories. This paper explains the role of the forensic advisors in Belgium, the path that let to their current status and problems encountered.
[1]
David Barclay,et al.
Using forensic science in major crime inquiries
,
2009
.
[2]
Alastair Ross,et al.
Benchmarking Forensic Performance in Australia–Volume Crime
,
2014
.
[3]
Pierre Margot,et al.
Is Forensic Science Worth It?1
,
2019
.
[4]
Olivier Delémont,et al.
The practice of crime scene examination in an intelligence-based perspective
,
2017
.
[5]
Olivier Delémont,et al.
To analyse a trace or not? Evaluating the decision-making process in the criminal investigation.
,
2016,
Forensic science international.
[6]
Olivier Delémont,et al.
Utility of the clue - From assessing the investigative contribution of forensic science to supporting the decision to use traces.
,
2015,
Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.
[7]
B. Renard.
Les analyses génétiques en matière pénale : l’innovation technique porteuse d’innovation pénale ?
,
2007
.
[8]
Dagobert Soergel.
Indexing and retrieval performance: the logical evidence
,
1994
.