Lexical recovery from extinction: Interactions between visual form and stored knowledge modulate visual selection

The effects of lexical knowledge on extinction were examined in a patient with bilateral parietal lesions and left extinction under double simultaneous stimulation: GK. GK was bilaterally presented with two letters that could form either a word or a nonword. In Experiments 1–3, the task was to identify each letter. GK showed better identification of left-side letters in words than in nonwords, whilst the identification of left-side letters in nonwords was worse than that of single letters presented in the same spatial positions (i.e., there was a word superiority effect under conditions in which extinction occurred). This lexical effect on completely correct responses tended to be larger for words with lower-case letters (Experiments 2 and 3) than for words with upper-case letters (Experiment 1). Different results arose when detection was measured. When letters could group by proximity and common contrast polarity, no word superiority effect was apparent. However, a word superiority effect re-emerged when low-level grouping was reduced by using letters with opposite contrast polarity (one white and one black on a grey background). The results are discussed in terms of the impact of different factors on selection in detection and identification tasks, and in terms of the modulatory roles of familiar form and stored knowledge on visual selection.

[1]  G W Humphreys,et al.  Neuropsychological Evidence for Case-Specific Reading: Multi-Letter Units in Visual Word Recognition , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[2]  G W Humphreys,et al.  Neural representation of objects in space: a dual coding account. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[3]  Glyn W. Humphreys Dietmar Heinke,et al.  Spatial Representation and Selection in the Brain: Neuropsychological and Computational Constraints , 1998 .

[4]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Disruption to word or letter processing? The origins of case-mixing effects. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Grouping and Extinction: Evidence for Low-level Modulation of Visual Selection , 1996 .

[6]  M. Mozer,et al.  Perceptual and conceptual mechanisms in neglect dyslexia. Two contrasting case studies. , 1995, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Non-spatial extinction following lesions of the parietal lobe in humans , 1994, Nature.

[8]  Jon Driver,et al.  Reading of letters and words in a patient with Balint's syndrome , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  M. Farah,et al.  Unconscious perception of “extinguished” visual stimuli: Reassessing the evidence , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  J. Riddoch,et al.  Interaction of attentional and lexical processes in neglect dyslexia , 1990 .

[11]  Hans-Otto Karnath,et al.  Deficits of attention in acute and recovered visual hemi-neglect , 1988, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  Kenneth R. Paap,et al.  Word shape's in poor shape for the race to the lexicon. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  G. Humphreys,et al.  The Use of Abstract Graphemic Information in Lexical Access , 1981 .

[14]  Marilyn Jager Adams,et al.  Models of word recognition , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  J. Riddoch,et al.  13. Competitive mechanisms of selection by space and object: a neuropsychological approach , 1996 .

[16]  Jon Driver,et al.  Grouping reduces visual extinction: Neuropsychological evidence for weight-linkage in visual selection , 1994 .

[17]  J. L. Mcclelland Preliminary letter identification in the perception of words and nonwords. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.