Playing ‘Pong’ Together: Emergent Coordination in a Doubles Interception Task

In this contribution we set out to study how a team of two players coordinated their actions so as to intercept an approaching ball. Adopting a doubles-pong task, six teams of two participants each intercepted balls moving downward across a screen toward an interception axis by laterally displacing participant-controlled on-screen paddles. With collisions between paddles resulting in unsuccessful interception, on each trial participants had to decide amongst them who would intercept the ball and who would not. In the absence of possibilities for overt communication, such team decisions were informed exclusively by the visual information provided on the screen. Results demonstrated that collisions were rare and that 91.3 ± 3.4% of all balls were intercepted. While all teams demonstrated a global division of interception space, boundaries between interception domains were fuzzy and could moreover be shifted away from the center of the screen. Balls arriving between the participants’ initial paddle positions often gave rise to both participants initiating an interception movement, requiring one of the participants to abandon the interception attempt at some point so as to allow the other participant to intercept the ball. A simulation of on-the-fly decision making of who intercepted the ball based on a measure capturing the triangular relations between the two paddles and the ball allowed the qualitative aspects of the pattern of observed results to be reproduced, including the timing of abandoning. Overall, the results thus suggest that decisions regarding who intercepts the ball emerge from between-participant interactions.

[1]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Contrasting Approaches to Perceiving and Acting With Others , 2006 .

[2]  R. Bootsma,et al.  Dynamics of human postural transitions. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  F. Zaal,et al.  Shaping decisions in volleyball: an ecological approach to decision-making in volleyball passing. , 2013 .

[4]  Brett R Fajen,et al.  Visual Guidance of Intercepting a Moving Target on Foot , 2004, Perception.

[5]  K. Davids,et al.  The ecological dynamics of decision making in sport , 2006 .

[6]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Ecological Psychology: Six Principles for an Embodied–Embedded Approach to Behavior , 2008 .

[7]  Natalie Sebanz,et al.  Prediction in Joint Action: What, When, and Where , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[8]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Changing your mind: a computational mechanism of vacillation , 2009, Nature.

[9]  R. Bootsma,et al.  Prospective Control in Catching: The Persistent Angle-of-Approach Effect in Lateral Interception , 2013, PloS one.

[10]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Coordination dynamics in a socially situated nervous system , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[11]  W. H. Warren,et al.  Behavioral dynamics of intercepting a moving target , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  J. Wade,et al.  Changes of mind , 1996 .

[13]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Self-organized complementary joint action: Behavioral dynamics of an interpersonal collision-avoidance task. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  R. Bootsma,et al.  Timing an attacking forehand drive in table tennis. , 1990 .

[15]  H. Haken,et al.  A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[16]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Affording cooperation: Embodied constraints, dynamics, and action-scaled invariance in joint lifting , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[17]  Luciano da Fontoura Costa,et al.  Dynamic Patterns: The Self-organization of Brain and Behavior: J.A. Scott Kelso, MIT Press, 1997, 334pp., ISBN 0-262-11200-0 (HB) , 2000, Neurocomputing.

[18]  Kevin Shockley,et al.  Interpersonal Synergies , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[19]  G. Montagne,et al.  A Robust Solution for Dealing With Environmental Changes in Intercepting Moving Balls , 2005, Journal of motor behavior.

[20]  P. N. Kugler,et al.  Information, Natural Law, and the Self-Assembly of Rhythmic Movement , 2015 .

[21]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 2002, Technometrics.

[22]  Paul Cisek,et al.  Cortical mechanisms of action selection: the affordance competition hypothesis , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  Reinoud J Bootsma,et al.  Fractional-order information in the visual control of lateral locomotor interception. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  Monica Fabiani,et al.  When in Doubt, Do it Both Ways: Brain Evidence of the Simultaneous Activation of Conflicting Motor Responses in a Spatial Stroop Task , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  A. Fuchs,et al.  Coordination: Neural, Behavioral and Social Dynamics , 2008 .

[26]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Author ' s personal copy Recognizing group cognition Action editor : , 2010 .

[27]  David M Jacobs,et al.  Lateral interception II: predicting hand movements. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Rocking together: dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination. , 2007, Human movement science.

[29]  Kait Clark,et al.  What can 1 billion trials tell us about visual search? , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  Keith Davids,et al.  Informational constraints shape emergent functional behaviours during performance of interceptive actions in team sports , 2012 .

[31]  David W. Eccles,et al.  Why an Expert Team is More Than a Team of Experts: A Social-Cognitive Conceptualization of Team Coordination and Communication in Sport. , 2004 .

[32]  David W. Eccles,et al.  A commentary on “team cognition and expert teams: Emerging insights into performance for exceptional teams” , 2006 .

[33]  Michael J Richardson,et al.  Can discrete joint action be synergistic? Studying the stabilization of interpersonal hand coordination. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  P. N. Kugler,et al.  Patterns of human interlimb coordination emerge from the properties of non-linear, limit cycle oscillatory processes: theory and data. , 1981, Journal of motor behavior.

[35]  Nathan F. Lepora,et al.  Embodied Choice: How Action Influences Perceptual Decision Making , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[36]  T A Stoffregen,et al.  Postural coordination modes considered as emergent phenomena. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  F. C. Bakker,et al.  Catching balls: how to get the hand to the right place at the right time. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Social Connection Through Joint Action and Interpersonal Coordination , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[39]  P. N. Kugler,et al.  Patterns of human interlimb coordination emerge from the properties of non-linear, limit cycle oscillatory processes: theory and data. , 1981, Journal of motor behavior.

[40]  J. Cannon-Bowers,et al.  Applying work team results to sports teams: Opportunities and cautions , 2006 .

[41]  David R. Cox The analysis of binary data , 1970 .

[42]  M. Turvey,et al.  Phase transitions and critical fluctuations in the visual coordination of rhythmic movements between people. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  Paula Fitzpatrick,et al.  Understanding social motor coordination. , 2011, Human movement science.

[44]  Gavan Lintern,et al.  Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior , 1997, Complex.

[45]  E. Salas,et al.  Shared mental models in expert team decision making. , 1993 .

[46]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Evaluating the Dynamics of Unintended Interpersonal Coordination , 1997 .

[47]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[48]  R. Bootsma,et al.  Two-handed performance of a rhythmical fitts task by individuals and dyads. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The physics of optimal decision making: a formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks. , 2006, Psychological review.

[50]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Running head : Challenging EgoCentric Perceiving , Acting and Knowing Challenging the Egocentric View of Coordinated Perceiving , Acting and Knowing , 2008 .

[51]  Kevin Shockley,et al.  Joint action in a cooperative precision task: nested processes of intrapersonal and interpersonal coordination , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[52]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Dynamics of Interpersonal Coordination , 2008 .