Competing frames of immigrant integration in the EU: geographies of social inclusion in Italian regions

After the federal reform of 2001, Italian regions have gained greater autonomy in matters of social policy, including immigrant integration. In this paper, we assess frames of immigrant integration in eight Italian regions, i.e. Piedmont, Veneto and Emilia-Romagna in the North, Umbria, Marche and Abruzzi in the Centre, Basilicata and Calabria in the South, against the EU equal treatment and mobility rights-based regime. Through a diachronic analysis of the regions' official documents on immigrants' integration approved in the period 2000–2010, we shall consider: (1) the policy priorities identified and the measures funded and (2) the implementation structures. The analysis points out how the frames of immigrant integration emerging at a regional level shape different geographies of social inclusion which are sometimes openly in contradiction with the EU discourse on equal treatment and mobility rights. Immigration is perceived more as an economic asset for local labour markets' unsatisfied demand for low-qualified, flexible, and often informal workers, rather than as a strategic resource for the realisation of a competitive and knowledge-based European economy.

[1]  G. Craig,et al.  Wilful negligence: migration policy, migrants' work and the absence of social protection in the UK , 2012 .

[2]  Glenda Lawrence,et al.  Equal treatment in employment and occupation , 2014 .

[3]  C. Woolfson Labour Standards and Migration in the New Europe: Post-Communist Legacies and Perspectives , 2007 .

[4]  M. Borkert,et al.  The Local Dimension of Migration Policymaking , 2010 .

[5]  C. Joppke Beyond national models: Civic integration policies for immigrants in Western Europe , 2007 .

[6]  COMMON BASIC PRINCIPLES FOR IMMIGRANT INTEGRATION POLICY IN THE , 2006 .

[7]  A. Cerami,et al.  Migration and Welfare in the New Europe: Social Protection and the Challenges of Integration , 2011 .

[8]  Regine Paul Migration and Mobility in the European Union , 2013 .

[9]  Kay Hailbronner,et al.  Council Directive 2003/86/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification , 2010 .

[10]  S. Carrera,et al.  Doing and Deserving: Competing Frames of Integration in the European Union , 2008 .

[11]  P. Graziano,et al.  Towards a security-oriented migration policy model? Evidence from the Italian case , 2011 .

[12]  M. Ferrera,et al.  The 'Southern Model' of Welfare in Social Europe , 1996 .

[13]  A. Rea,et al.  The end of national models? Integration courses and citizenship trajectories in Europe , 2007 .

[14]  I. Diamanti Mappe dell'Italia politica : bianco, rosso, verde, azzurro... e tricolore , 2009 .

[15]  Lorenzo Beltrame Realtà e retorica del brain drain in Italia. Stime statistiche, definizioni pubbliche e interventi politici , 2007 .

[16]  Theodoros Papadopoulos Immigration and the variety of migrant integration regimes in the European Union , 2011 .

[17]  P. Villa,et al.  Change in care regimes and female migration: the ‘care drain’ in the Mediterranean , 2006 .

[18]  A. Geddes,et al.  CHRISTINA BOSWELL, ANDREW GEDDES, MIGRATION AND MOBILNY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION, PALGRAVE MACMILLAN, BASINGSTOKE, 2011 , 2012 .

[19]  Jerry T. Mitchell The Politics of Migration and Immigration in Europe , 2006 .

[20]  I. Madama Le politiche di assistenza sociale , 2010 .

[21]  R. Penninx,et al.  Citizenship in European Cities: Immigrants, Local Politics and Integration Policies , 2004 .

[22]  E. Carmel European Union migration governance: utility, security and integration , 2011 .

[23]  F. Campomori Immigrazione e cittadinanza locale. La governance dell'integrazione in Italia , 2008 .

[24]  C. Saraceno,et al.  Social and Family Policies in Italy: Not Totally Frozen but Far from Structural Reforms , 2008 .

[25]  P. Graziano,et al.  ‘Selective Flexicurity’ in Segmented Labour Markets: The Case of Italian ‘Mid-Siders’ , 2010, Journal of Social Policy.