Stress-shielding of the proximal femur using an extensively porous-coated femoral component without allograft in revision surgery: a 5- to 17-year follow-up study.

Revision surgery of the hip was performed on 114 hips using an extensively porous-coated femoral component. Of these, 95 hips (94 patients) had a mean follow-up of 10.2 years (5 to 17). No cortical struts were used and the cortical index and the femoral cortical width were measured at different levels. There were two revisions for aseptic loosening. Survivorship at 12 years for all causes of failure was 96.9% (95% confidence interval 93.5 to 100) in the best-case scenario. Fibrous or unstable fixation was associated with major bone defects. The cortical index (p = 0.045) and the lateral cortical thickness (p = 0.008) decreased at the proximal level over time while the medial cortex increased (p = 0.001) at the proximal and distal levels. An increase in the proximal medial cortex was found in patients with an extended transtrochanteric osteotomy (p = 0.026) and in those with components shorter than 25 cm (p = 0.008). The use of the extensively porous-coated femoral component can provide a solution for difficult cases in revision surgery. Radiological bony ingrowth is common. Although without clinical relevance at the end of follow-up, the thickness of the medial femoral cortex often increased while that of the lateral cortex decreased. In cases in which a shorter component was used and in those undertaken using an extended trochanteric osteotomy, there was a greater increase in thickness of the femoral cortex over time.

[1]  G. Farfalli,et al.  Impacted Bone Allografts and a Cemented Stem after Failure of an Uncemented Stem: Preliminary Results , 2009, Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy.

[2]  E. Garcia-Cimbrelo,et al.  Radiographic bone regeneration and clinical outcome with the Wagner SL revision stem: a 5-year to 12-year follow-up study. , 2007, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[3]  B. W. Schreurs,et al.  Femoral component revision with use of impaction bone-grafting and a cemented polished stem. Surgical technique. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  R. Bourne,et al.  Fractures of distally-fixed femoral stems after revision arthroplasty. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[5]  S. Odum,et al.  Cementless revision total hip arthroplasty without allograft in severe proximal femoral defects. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[6]  Young-Hoo Kim,et al.  Revision hip arthroplasty using strut allografts and fully porous-coated stems. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[7]  S. Sporer,et al.  Femoral Fixation in the Face of Considerable Bone Loss: The Use of Modular Stems , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  C. Engh,et al.  Femoral Fixation in the Face of Considerable Bone Loss: Cylindrical and Extensively Coated Femoral Components , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  B. Masri,et al.  Intraoperative fracture of the femur in revision total hip arthroplasty with a diaphyseal fitting stem. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  D. Berry Treatment of Vancouver B3 Periprosthetic Femur Fractures With a Fluted Tapered Stem , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  S. Sporer,et al.  Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: The Limits of Fully Coated Stems , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  A. Timperley,et al.  Femoral impaction grafting with cement in revision total hip replacement. Evolution of the technique and results. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[13]  W. Paprosky,et al.  Minimal 11-year follow-up of extensively porous-coated stems in femoral revision total hip arthroplasty. , 2002, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[14]  A. Gonzalez Della Valle,et al.  Revision of the femoral prosthesis with impaction allografting and a Charnley stem. A 2- to 12-year follow-up. , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[15]  J. Moreland,et al.  Cementless Femoral Revision Arthroplasty of the Hip: Minimum 5 Years Followup , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  J. Boldt,et al.  Revision total hip arthroplasty using impaction bone grafting with cemented nonpolished stems and charnley cups. , 2001, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[17]  P. Böhm,et al.  Femoral Revision with the Wagner SL Revision Stem: Evaluation of One Hundred and Twenty-nine Revisions Followed for a Mean of 4.8 Years , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  S. MacDonald,et al.  Periprosthetic femoral fractures treated with a long-stem cementless component. , 2001, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[19]  J. Antoniou,et al.  Minimum 10-year-results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[20]  B. Masri,et al.  Impaction allografting with cement for the management of femoral bone loss. , 1998, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[21]  C. Engh,et al.  Revision of Loose Cementless Femoral Prostheses to Larger Porous Coated Components , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[22]  G. Scuderi**,et al.  Survivorship of cemented total knee arthroplasty. , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[23]  S. MacDonald,et al.  5- to 13-year follow-up study on cementless femoral components in revision surgery. , 1997, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[24]  D. Murray,et al.  LOSS TO FOLLOW-UP MATTERS , 1997 .

[25]  T. Gruen A simple assessment of bone quality prior to hip arthroplasty: cortical index revisited. , 1997, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[26]  J. Moreland,et al.  Femoral revision hip arthroplasty with uncemented, porous-coated stems. , 1995, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[27]  K. Kolstad Revision THR after periprosthetic femoral fractures. An analysis of 23 cases. , 1994, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[28]  H. Tullos,et al.  Effect of rotation on the radiographic appearance of the femoral canal. , 1994, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[29]  C. Engh,et al.  Outcome of revision hip arthroplasty done without cement. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[30]  J. Bosco,et al.  Survivorship analysis of cemented high modulus total hip arthroplasty. , 1993, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.

[31]  A. Timperley,et al.  Impacted cancellous allografts and cement for revision total hip arthroplasty. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[32]  C. Engh,et al.  Comparison of porous-threaded and smooth-threaded acetabular components of identical design. Two- to four-year results. , 1991, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[33]  C. Engh,et al.  The case for porous-coated hip implants. The femoral side. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[34]  R A Brand,et al.  Roentgenographic changes in proximal femoral dimensions due to hip rotation. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[35]  M. Mayor,et al.  Potential errors inherent in quantitative densitometric analysis of orthopaedic radiographs. A study after total hip arthroplasty. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[36]  C. Engh,et al.  Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[37]  F. Dorey,et al.  Survivorship analysis in the evaluation of joint replacement. , 1986, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[38]  P. D. Wilson,et al.  Results of revision for mechanical failure after cemented total hip replacement, 1979 to 1982. A two to five-year follow-up. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[39]  H. Amstutz,et al.  "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. , 1979, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[40]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .

[41]  R. M. D'aubigne,et al.  Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis , 2011 .