In vitro human skin irritation test for evaluation of medical device extracts.

The aim of this study was to determine if the EpiDerm™ reconstructed human skin model (MatTek Corp.) could be an acceptable alternative to the ISO 10993-required rabbit skin irritation test for assessing medical device biocompatibility. Eleven medical device polymers were tested. Four extracts were prepared per polymer, two each with saline and sesame oil; half were spiked with two R-38 irritants, lactic acid for saline extracts and heptanoic acid for the sesame oil extracts. Tissue viability was assessed by MTT reduction and the proinflammatory response was assessed by IL-1α release. LOAELs of 2% for lactic acid in saline and 0.7% for heptanoic acid in sesame oil were determined. A cell viability reduction of >50% was indicative of skin irritation. Cells exposed to saline extracts spiked with 3.25% lactic acid had significantly reduced mean cell viabilities (12.6-17.2%). Cells exposed to sesame oil extracts spiked with 1.25% heptanoic acid also exhibited reduced mean cell viabilities (25.5%-41.7%). All spiked cells released substantial amounts of IL-1α (253.5-387.4pg/ml) signifying a proinflammatory response. These results indicate that the EpiDerm™ model may be a suitable in vitro replacement for the assessment of the irritation potential of medical device extracts.

[1]  K. Frei,et al.  [Interleukin 1]. , 1985, Schweizerische medizinische Wochenschrift.

[2]  P. Elias,et al.  The biochemistry and function of stratum corneum lipids. , 1991, Advances in lipid research.

[3]  C. Tyson,et al.  Interspecies comparisons of skin irritancy. , 1975, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[4]  H I Maibach,et al.  The rabbit as a model for evaluating skin irritants: a comparison of results obtained on animals and man using repeated skin exposures. , 1975, Food and cosmetics toxicology.

[5]  B. De Wever,et al.  Predictivity of an in vitro model for acute and chronic skin irritation (SkinEthic) applied to the testing of topical vehicles , 1999, Cell Biology and Toxicology.

[6]  C S Weil,et al.  Study of intra- and interlaboratory variability in the results of rabbit eye and skin irritation tests. , 1971, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[7]  D. Basketter,et al.  Comparison of human skin irritation and photo-irritation patch test data with cellular in vitro assays and animal in vivo data , 2008 .

[8]  T. Mosmann.  Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. , 1983, Journal of immunological methods.

[9]  David A Basketter,et al.  Determination of skin irritation potential in the human 4‐h patch test , 2004, Contact dermatitis.

[10]  Nathalie Alépée,et al.  A catch-up validation study on reconstructed human epidermis (SkinEthic RHE) for full replacement of the Draize skin irritation test. , 2010, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[11]  H. Kandárová,et al.  In Vitro Skin Irritation Testing: Improving the Sensitivity of the EpiDerm Skin Irritation Test Protocol , 2009, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[12]  M Liebsch,et al.  The ECVAM Prevalidation Study on the Use of EpiDerm for Skin Corrosivity Testing , 2000, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[13]  Claus-Michael Lehr,et al.  Permeability of the reconstructed human epidermis model Episkin in comparison to various human skin preparations. , 2007, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[14]  D. Basketter,et al.  The classification of skin irritants by human patch test. , 1997, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[15]  S. D. De Salva,et al.  The influence of concentration, exposure duration, and patch occlusivity upon rabbit primary dermal irritation indices. , 1978, Drug and chemical toxicology.

[16]  J. Marks,et al.  Lookingbill and Marks' Principles of Dermatology , 2006 .

[17]  D. Basketter,et al.  A two-center study of the development of acute irritation responses to fatty acids. , 1999, American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society.

[18]  N. Jellinek.  Rook's textbook of dermatology. Seventh edition , 2006 .

[19]  J. Sangster.  Octanol-Water Partition Coefficients: Fundamentals and Physical Chemistry , 1997 .

[20]  M. Ponec,et al.  In vitro cultured human skin cells as alternatives to animals for skin irritancy screening , 1992, International journal of cosmetic science.

[21]  Valérie Zuang,et al.  The ECVAM International Validation Study on in Vitro Tests for Acute Skin Irritation: Report on the Validity of the EPISKIN and EpiDerm Assays and on the Skin Integrity Function Test a , 2007, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[22]  M. Seiberg,et al.  The influence of the response of skin equivalent systems to topically applied consumer products by epithelial--mesenchymal interactions. , 1999, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[23]  Arthur Rook,et al.  Rook's Textbook of Dermatology , 2004 .

[24]  R Roguet,et al.  A prevalidation study on in vitro tests for acute skin irritation. results and evaluation by the Management Team. , 2001, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[25]  John H. Draize,et al.  METHODS FOR THE STUDY OF IRRITATION AND TOXICITY OF SUBSTANCES APPLIED TOPICALLY TO THE SKIN AND MUCOUS MEMBRANES , 1944 .

[26]  M K Robinson,et al.  Comparison of in vitro and in vivo human skin responses to consumer products and ingredients with a range of irritancy potential. , 1999, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[27]  H. Maibach,et al.  A comparison of rabbit and human skin response to certain irritants. , 1972, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[28]  H. Maibach,et al.  In vitro skin irritation testing on reconstituted human epidermis: reproducibility for 50 chemicals tested with two protocols. , 2006, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[29]  R. Scott,et al.  The influence of skin structure on permeability: an intersite and interspecies comparison with hydrophilic penetrants. , 1990, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[30]  T. Hartung,et al.  STATEMENT ON THE VALIDITY OF IN-VITRO TESTS FOR SKIN IRRITATION , 2007 .

[31]  David A Basketter,et al.  In vitro skin irritation: facts and future. State of the art review of mechanisms and models. , 2004, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.