AIM
Nurses and midwives are expanding the scope of their professional practice, assuming additional responsibilities including the management and prescribing of medications. The aim of the study was to discover the attitudes of clinical nurse specialists (CNSs) in Ireland to nurse prescribing and to examine perceived barriers to engaging in this aspect of future role expansion.
BACKGROUND
The expansion of the nursing role in relation to nurse prescribing is an ongoing process and is subject to incremental iterations of legislation and professional policy. Nurse prescribing as an expanded role function has become a reality in many countries. Ireland has addressed the matter in a formal and systematic way through legislation.
METHOD
A questionnaire was administered to a sample of 283 CNSs practising in a variety of care settings in Ireland. Attitudes were measured using Likert-type attitudinal scales, designed specifically for the study.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
Findings indicate that the majority of clinical nurse specialists were positively disposed toward nurse prescribing as a future role expansion. The fear of litigation was identified as the most significant barrier to nurse prescribing. The majority of respondents equated nurse prescribing with increased autonomy and holistic care. The findings indicate that there is a need for further examination of the educational requirements of the CNS in relation to nurse prescribing. The legislative implications for nurse prescribing and fear of legal consequences need to be considered prior to any implementation of nurse prescribing.
IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT
While senior clinicians are willing to embrace future role expansion in the area of nurse prescribing, their Nurse Managers should recognize that facilitation of nurse prescribing needs to address the legal and educational requirements for such activity. Failure to address these requirements can represent a barrier to role expansion. This paper offers new understandings on the views of senior clinicians concerning nurse prescribing at a time of ongoing professional policy iteration and practice change in the area.
[1]
M. Courtenay,et al.
Independent prescribing and beyond
,
2006
.
[2]
Molly Courtenay,et al.
Effectiveness of nurse prescribing: a review of the literature.
,
2004,
Journal of clinical nursing.
[3]
Susan Wilhelmsson,et al.
Exploring views on Swedish district nurses' prescribing--a focus group study in primary health care.
,
2003,
Journal of clinical nursing.
[4]
M. Sodha,et al.
Nurses' confidence and pharmacological knowledge: a study.
,
2002,
British journal of community nursing.
[5]
C. Otway.
The development needs of nurse prescribers
,
2002
.
[6]
C. Otway.
Informal peer support: a key to success for nurse prescribers.
,
2001,
British journal of community nursing.
[7]
C. Hicks,et al.
The occupational profile and associated training needs of the nurse prescriber: an empirical study of family planning nurses.
,
2001,
Journal of advanced nursing.
[8]
C. Rodden.
Nurse prescribing: views on autonomy
,
2001
.
[9]
E. Slevin,et al.
Nurses' attitudes to the extension and expansion of their clinical roles.
,
1999,
Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).
[10]
L. Doyal,et al.
Nurses taking on junior doctors' work: a confusion of accountability
,
1996,
BMJ.
[11]
M. Mayes.
A study of prescribing patterns in the community.
,
1996,
Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).
[12]
A. Wedgwood.
Nurse prescribing. The case for prescribing the pill.
,
1995,
Nursing times.
[13]
K. Koefman,et al.
Developing a new deal for nurses.
,
1995,
Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).
[14]
A. Wedgwood.
THE CASE FOR PRESCRIBING THE PILL
,
1995
.
[15]
J. Tingle.
Nurses and the law. Responsible and liable?
,
1990,
Nursing times.