Nanoindentation study of polydimethylsiloxane elastic modulus using Berkovich and flat punch tips

This article explores polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) mechanical properties, and presents nanoindentation experiments with Berkovich and flat punch indenters. In the Berkovich tip quasi-static nanoindentation test, there are pull-in and pull-off events observed during the initial tip contact, and when withdrawing from the surface, respectively. The pull-in interaction needs to be accounted for to properly determine the initial contact point, and thus the accurate contact area. Once accounted for the pull-in event, the Berkovich and flat punch tips quasi-static nanoindentation tests give comparable results of about 1.5 MPa for the PDMS elastic modulus (5 : 1 elastomer base to the curing agent ratio). However, PDMS unloading stiffness is higher than the loading stiff- ness, and dynamic PDMS testing yields higher elastic modulus of about 3.6 MPa. While these results are comparable with the large strain macroscopic compression test results, the difference underscores the complexity of elastomer mechanical characterization and illustrates the discrepancies typical of the reported values. This article describes nanoindentation methods and critical aspects of inter- preting results to assess PDMS mechanical properties. V C 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014, 131, 41384.

[1]  E. B. Orler,et al.  Stress softening experiments in silica-filled polydimethylsiloxane provide insight into a mechanism for the Mullins effect , 2005 .

[2]  Joyce Y Wong,et al.  Evaluation of polydimethylsiloxane scaffolds with physiologically-relevant elastic moduli: interplay of substrate mechanics and surface chemistry effects on vascular smooth muscle cell response. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[3]  P. Tracqui,et al.  Optimization of poly-di-methyl-siloxane (PDMS) substrates for studying cellular adhesion and motility , 2008 .

[4]  D. Ebenstein Nano-JKR force curve method overcomes challenges of surface detection and adhesion for nanoindentation of a compliant polymer in air and water , 2011 .

[5]  D. Raabe,et al.  The use of flat punch indentation to determine the viscoelastic properties in the time and frequency domains of a soft layer bonded to a rigid substrate. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.

[6]  G. Odegard,et al.  Characterization of viscoelastic properties of polymeric materials through nanoindentation , 2005 .

[7]  Xin Zhang,et al.  Viscoelastic Characterization and Modeling of Polymer Transducers for Biological Applications , 2009, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[8]  Kimberly L Ogden,et al.  Efficient extraction method to collect sugar from sweet sorghum , 2013, Journal of Biological Engineering.

[9]  Rachelle N. Palchesko,et al.  Development of Polydimethylsiloxane Substrates with Tunable Elastic Modulus to Study Cell Mechanobiology in Muscle and Nerve , 2012, PloS one.

[10]  D. Ebenstein,et al.  Eliminating adhesion errors in nanoindentation of compliant polymers and hydrogels. , 2013, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[11]  L. Mullins Softening of Rubber by Deformation , 1969 .

[12]  Hongbing Lu,et al.  Investigation of Cellular Contraction Forces in the Frequency Domain Using a PDMS Micropillar-Based Force Transducer , 2013, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[13]  H. Matthias Deuschle,et al.  In situ indentation testing of elastomers , 2008 .

[14]  Rui Zhu,et al.  Microstructure and mechanical properties of a polyethylene/polydimethylsiloxane composite prepared using supercritical carbon dioxide , 2013 .

[15]  C. Naddeo,et al.  Recognition of the syndiotactic polypropylene polymorphs via dynamic‐mechanical analysis , 2003 .

[16]  Wei Liu,et al.  CORRIGENDUM: Biodegradation-inspired bioproduction of methylacetoin and 2-methyl-2,3-butanediol , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[17]  N. Moody,et al.  8.13 – Nanoindentation Methods in Interfacial Fracture Testing , 2003 .

[18]  T. Murayama,et al.  Dynamic mechanical analysis of polymeric material , 1978 .

[19]  L. E. Scriven,et al.  Flat‐punch indentation of viscoelastic material , 2000 .

[20]  Chung-Souk Han,et al.  On the time and indentation depth dependence of hardness, dissipation and stiffness in polydimethylsiloxane , 2013 .

[21]  W. L. Harries,et al.  Dynamic mechanical analysis of polymeric materials , 1990 .

[22]  G. Marshall,et al.  Nanoindentation of polydimethylsiloxane elastomers: Effect of crosslinking, work of adhesion, and fluid environment on elastic modulus , 2005 .

[23]  Vamsi K Yadavalli,et al.  Effect of substrate stiffness on early human embryonic stem cell differentiation , 2013, Journal of Biological Engineering.

[24]  James F. Smith,et al.  Displacement Modulation Based Dynamic Nanoindentation for Viscoelastic Material Characterization , 2004 .

[25]  C. Stafford,et al.  Measuring the Modulus of Soft Polymer Networks via a Buckling-Based Metrology , 2006 .

[26]  J. Cauich‐Rodríguez,et al.  Study of crosslinking density in polydimethylsiloxane networks by DSC , 1995 .

[27]  Ping Ning,et al.  Simultaneous adsorptive removal of methylene blue and copper ions from aqueous solution by ferrocene‐modified cation exchange resin , 2014 .

[28]  Alex A. Volinsky,et al.  Nanoindentaion techniques for assessing mechanical reliability at the nanoscale , 2003 .

[29]  E. Arzt,et al.  Surface detection in nanoindentation of soft polymers , 2007 .