Structural dynamic monitoring in historical masonry structures using wireless and MEMS technology

For most advanced economies, buildings represent one of the largest single investments of national resources. While recently built buildings are very important, there are other existent structures that require even more attention. The permanent study of ancient buildings, which represents the architectural heritage of a region, is a key aspect to modern societies since the impact of a possible loss is not only economical but also cultural. In the process of preservation of architectural heritage, the damage evaluation and the monitoring procedures are attractive, due to the modern philosophy of minimum repair and the use of non intrusive methods. The developments on Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) and the increasing interest in the scientific community to improve wireless transmission technologies make this field interesting for the structural monitoring. Since 2003, the Civil Engineering Department of the University of Minho (UMINHO) has been involved in performing static and dynamic monitoring tests on historical masonry structures. For what concerns dynamic monitoring, Output-Only methods with conventional wired based sensors and data acquisition platforms have been used in several monuments in Portugal and even abroad with successful results. In 2007, the PhD project was initiated with the aim of use the new technology based on wireless platforms with embedded MEMS to perform dynamic monitoring tests. The results presented in this paper belong to this study.

[1]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: A literature review , 1996 .

[2]  P. Van Overschee,et al.  Subspace algorithms for the stochastic identification problem , 1991 .

[3]  Elsa Caetano,et al.  FROM INPUT-OUTPUT TO OUTPUT-ONLY MODAL IDENTIFICATION OF CIVIL ENGINEERING STRUCTURES , 2005 .

[4]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  REFERENCE-BASED STOCHASTIC SUBSPACE IDENTIFICATION FOR OUTPUT-ONLY MODAL ANALYSIS , 1999 .

[5]  Jerome P. Lynch,et al.  A summary review of wireless sensors and sensor networks for structural health monitoring , 2006 .

[6]  Anne S. Kiremidjian,et al.  Modular, wireless network platform for monitoring structures , 1998 .

[7]  Tony Larsson,et al.  THE EVALUATION OF TINYOS WITH WIRELESS SENSOR NODE OPERATING SYSTEMS , 2007 .

[8]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  smart sensors for civil infrastructure systems , 2004 .

[9]  Jerome Peter Lynch,et al.  An overview of wireless structural health monitoring for civil structures , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[10]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering , 1995 .

[11]  Erik G. Straser,et al.  Title : Structural Damage Monitoring for Civil Structures , 1997 .

[12]  Anne S. Kiremidjian,et al.  A modular, wireless damage monitoring system for structures , 1998 .

[13]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  A statistical comparison of impact and ambient testing results from the Alamosa Canyon Bridge , 1996 .

[14]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  Design and performance validation of a wireless sensing unit for structural monitoring applications , 2004 .

[15]  Ricardo Severino,et al.  On the use of IEEE 802.15.4/Zigbee for time-sensitive wireless sensor network applications , 2008 .

[16]  S. Manesis,et al.  A Survey of Applications of Wireless Sensors and Wireless Sensor Networks , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Symposium on, Mediterrean Conference on Control and Automation Intelligent Control, 2005..