Noninvasive Autoregulation Monitoring with and without Intracranial Pressure in the Naïve Piglet Brain

BACKGROUND: Cerebrovascular autoregulation monitoring is often desirable for critically ill patients in whom intracranial pressure (ICP) is not measured directly. Without ICP, arterial blood pressure (ABP) is a substitute for cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) to gauge the constraint of cerebral blood flow across pressure changes. We compared the use of ABP versus CPP to measure autoregulation in a piglet model of arterial hypotension. METHODS: Our database of neonatal piglet (5–7 days old) experiments was queried for animals with naïve ICP that were made lethally hypotensive to determine the lower limit of autoregulation (LLA). Twenty-five piglets were identified, each with continuous recordings of ICP, regional cerebral oximetry (rSO2), and cortical red cell flux (laser Doppler). Autoregulation was assessed with the cerebral oximetry index (COx) in 2 ways: linear correlation between ABP and rSO2 (COxABP) and between CPP and rSO2 (COxCPP). The lower limits of autoregulation were determined from plots of red cell flux versus ABP. Averaged values of COxABP and COxCPP from 5 mm Hg ABP bins were used to show receiver operating characteristics for the 2 methods. RESULTS: COxABP and COxCPP yielded identical receiver operating characteristic curve areas of 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88–0.95) for determining the LLA. However, the thresholds for the 2 methods differed: a threshold COxABP of 0.5 was 89% sensitive (95% CI, 81%–94%) and 81% specific (95% CI, 73%–88%) for detecting ABP below the LLA. A threshold COxCPP of 0.42 gave the same 89% sensitivity (95% CI, 81%–94%) with 77% specificity (95% CI, 69%–84%). CONCLUSIONS: The use of ABP instead of CPP for autoregulation monitoring in the naïve brain with COx results in a higher threshold value to discriminate ABP above from ABP below the LLA. However, accuracy was similar with the 2 methods. These findings support and refine the use of near-infrared spectroscopy to monitor autoregulation in patients without ICP monitors.

[1]  J. Pickard,et al.  Monitoring of cerebral autoregulation in head-injured patients. , 1996, Stroke.

[2]  Josip Mihić,et al.  Head Injury in Children , 2012 .

[3]  J. Pickard,et al.  Continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular pressure reactivity allows determination of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in patients with traumatic brain injury , 2002, Critical care medicine.

[4]  J. Drummond,et al.  The lower limit of autoregulation: time to revise our thinking? , 1997, Anesthesiology.

[5]  David W Wright,et al.  Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. IX. Cerebral perfusion thresholds. , 2007, Journal of neurotrauma.

[6]  M. Msall The panorama of cerebral palsy after very and extremely preterm birth: evidence and challenges. , 2006, Clinics in perinatology.

[7]  C. Fraser,et al.  Congenital heart surgery 2005: the brain: it's the heart of the matter. , 2005, American journal of surgery.

[8]  R. Koehler,et al.  The Lower Limit of Cerebral Blood Flow Autoregulation Is Increased with Elevated Intracranial Pressure , 2009, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[9]  S. Strandgaard,et al.  Autoregulation of Cerebral Blood Flow in Hypertensive Patients: The Modifying Influence of Prolonged Antihypertensive Treatment on the Tolerance to Acute, Drug‐induced Hypotension , 1976, Circulation.

[10]  P. Smielewski,et al.  Continuous Monitoring of Cerebrovascular Pressure Reactivity After Traumatic Brain Injury in Children , 2009, Pediatrics.

[11]  F. Finnerty,et al.  Cerebral hemodynamics during cerebral ischemia induced by acute hypotension. , 1954, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[12]  Ken M. Brady,et al.  Continuous Measurement of Autoregulation by Spontaneous Fluctuations in Cerebral Perfusion Pressure: Comparison of 3 Methods , 2008, Stroke.

[13]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies , 1999, Statistical methods in medical research.

[14]  Marek Czosnyka,et al.  Cerebrovascular reactivity measured by near-infrared spectroscopy. , 2009, Stroke.

[15]  B. Carstensen,et al.  Statistical Models for Assessing Agreement in Method Comparison Studies with Replicate Measurements , 2008, The international journal of biostatistics.

[16]  P. Smielewski,et al.  Impaired Autoregulation of Cerebral Blood Flow During Rewarming from Hypothermic Cardiopulmonary Bypass and Its Potential Association with Stroke , 2010, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[17]  M. McCall Cerebral circulation and metabolism in toxemia of pregnancy; observations on the effects of veratrum viride and apresoline (1-hydrazinophthalazine). , 1953, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[18]  S. Marsch,et al.  Cerebral perfusion in sepsis-associated delirium , 2008, Critical care.

[19]  J. Pickard,et al.  Dynamic cerebral autoregulation: should intracranial pressure be taken into account? , 2007, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[20]  J. Pickard,et al.  Continuous assessment of cerebral autoregulation--clinical verification of the method in head injured patients. , 2000, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement.

[21]  R. Traystman,et al.  Hydrostatic determinants of cerebral perfusion , 1986, Critical care medicine.

[22]  N. Lassen,et al.  Cerebral blood flow and oxygen consumption in man. , 1959, Physiological reviews.

[23]  Marek Czosnyka,et al.  Near-Infrared Spectroscopy can Monitor Dynamic Cerebral Autoregulation in Adults , 2009, Neurocritical care.

[24]  False autoregulation (pseudoautoregulation) in patients with severe head injury. Its importance in CPP management. , 2000, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement.

[25]  R. Koehler,et al.  Continuous Time-Domain Analysis of Cerebrovascular Autoregulation Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy , 2007, Stroke.