Comparison of mechanical testing methods for biomaterials: Pipette aspiration, nanoindentation, and macroscale testing.

Characterization of the mechanical properties of biological materials is often complicated by small volume, irregular geometry, fragility, and environmental sensitivity. Pipette aspiration and nanoindentation testing deal well with these limitations and have seen increasing use in biomaterial characterization, but little research has been done to systematically validate these techniques for soft materials. This study compared the results of pipette aspiration, nanoindentation, and bulk uniaxial tension and compression in determining the small-strain elastic moduli of a range of biomedically-relevant materials, a series of silicone elastomers and polyacrylamide hydrogels. A custom apparatus was developed for pipette aspiration testing, a commercial Hysitron instrument with custom spherical tip was used for nanoindentation, and standard commercial machines were used for tension and compression testing. The measured small-strain elastic moduli ranged from 27 to 368 kPa for the silicones and 11 to 44 kPa for the polyacrylamide gels. All methods detected expected trends in material stiffness, except for the results from one inconsistent silicone. Pipette aspiration and nanoindentation measured similar elastic moduli for silicone materials, but pipette aspiration measured consistently larger stiffness in the hydrogels, which may be explained by the gels' resistance to tension. Despite the difference in size scale among the testing methods, size does not appear to influence the results. These results suggest that both pipette aspiration and nanoindentation are suitable for measuring mechanical properties of soft biomaterials and appear to have no more limitations than bulk techniques.

[1]  J. Pethica,et al.  Nanoindentation studies in a liquid environment , 1996 .

[2]  Toshiro Ohashi,et al.  Local elastic modulus of atherosclerotic lesions of rabbit thoracic aortas measured by pipette aspiration method. , 2002, Physiological measurement.

[3]  H. Matthias Deuschle,et al.  In situ indentation testing of elastomers , 2008 .

[4]  Thomas Boudou,et al.  An extended relationship for the characterization of Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio of tunable polyacrylamide gels. , 2006, Biorheology.

[5]  H A Mansy,et al.  Elastic properties of synthetic materials for soft tissue modeling. , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  K. Wahl,et al.  A comparison of JKR-based methods to analyze quasi-static and dynamic indentation force curves. , 2006, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[7]  V. Ferguson,et al.  Nanoindentation of Bone , 2019, Handbook of Nanoindentation with biological applications.

[8]  M. Swain,et al.  Nanoindentation of Tooth Tissues , 2010, Handbook of Nanoindentation with biological applications.

[9]  Russell A. Gould,et al.  Quantification of embryonic atrioventricular valve biomechanics during morphogenesis. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  Lisa A. Pruitt,et al.  Nanoindentation of biological materials , 2006 .

[11]  D. Ebenstein.  Nanoindentation of Soft Tissues and Other Biological Materials , 2010, Handbook of Nanoindentation with biological applications.

[12]  Joyce Y Wong,et al.  A simple microindentation technique for mapping the microscale compliance of soft hydrated materials and tissues. , 2006, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[13]  Roger R Markwald,et al.  Transitions in Early Embryonic Atrioventricular Valvular Function Correspond With Changes in Cushion Biomechanics That Are Predictable by Tissue Composition , 2007, Circulation research.

[14]  Nanoindentation studies on crosslinking and curing effects of PDMS , 2010 .

[15]  Finite size effect does not depend on the loading history in soft matter indentation , 2014 .

[16]  Thomas Boudou,et al.  An extended modeling of the micropipette aspiration experiment for the characterization of the Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio of adherent thin biological samples: numerical and experimental studies. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  Michelle L. Oyen,et al.  Nanoindentation of biological and biomimetic materials , 2013, Experimental Techniques.

[18]  Craig A Simmons,et al.  Measurement of layer-specific mechanical properties in multilayered biomaterials by micropipette aspiration. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[19]  Christian Cipriani,et al.  Bioinspired Fingertip for Anthropomorphic Robotic Hands , 2014 .

[20]  C. Buffinton,et al.  Effect of Calcification Modulus and Geometry on Stress in Models of Calcified Atherosclerotic Plaque , 2014 .

[21]  M. C. Tracey,et al.  Mechanical characterization of bulk Sylgard 184 for microfluidics and microengineering , 2014 .

[22]  Cheng Cheng,et al.  Development of Surrogate Spinal Cords for the Evaluation of Electrode Arrays Used in Intraspinal Implants , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  Christian M. Puttlitz,et al.  Erratum: “Nanoindentation of polydimethylsiloxane elastomers: Effect of crosslinking, work of adhesion,and fluid environment on elastic modulus” [J. Mater.Res. 20, 2820 (2005)] , 2006 .

[24]  Toshiro Ohashi,et al.  Pipette aspiration technique for the measurement of nonlinear and anisotropic mechanical properties of blood vessel walls under biaxial stretch. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  M. L. Hall,et al.  Effect of indenter size on elastic modulus of cartilage measured by indentation. , 2007, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[26]  Ulrike Wallrabe,et al.  Mechanical properties of silicones for MEMS , 2008 .

[27]  R. Waugh,et al.  Mechanics and Deformability of Hematocytes , 2014 .

[28]  Michelle L. Oyen,et al.  Fast identification of poroelastic parameters from indentation tests , 2009 .

[29]  Markus Böl,et al.  On a staggered iFEM approach to account for friction in compression testing of soft materials. , 2013, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[30]  D. C. Lin,et al.  Nanomechanics of polymer gels and biological tissues: A critical review of analytical approaches in the Hertzian regime and beyond. , 2008, Soft matter.

[31]  K. Kendall,et al.  Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids , 1971, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[32]  M. Meyers,et al.  Dynamic nanoindentation of articular porcine cartilage , 2011 .

[33]  Andrea M. Hodge,et al.  The nanoindentation of soft tissue: Current and developing approaches , 2008 .

[34]  G. Pharr,et al.  An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments , 1992 .

[35]  Ahmad Atieh,et al.  Design, Modeling, Fabrication and Testing of a Piezoresistive-Based Tactile Sensor for Minimally Invasive Surgery Applications , 2012 .

[36]  P. Janmey,et al.  Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. , 2005, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[37]  Lisa A Pruitt,et al.  The use of polyacrylamide gels for mechanical calibration of cartilage--a combined nanoindentation and unconfined compression study. , 2011, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[38]  Adam J Engler,et al.  Preparation of Hydrogel Substrates with Tunable Mechanical Properties , 2010, Current protocols in cell biology.

[39]  Jessica D. Kaufman,et al.  Surface detection errors cause overestimation of the modulus in nanoindentation on soft materials. , 2009, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[40]  R M Nerem,et al.  The application of a homogeneous half-space model in the analysis of endothelial cell micropipette measurements. , 1988, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[41]  Kaifeng Liu,et al.  Mechanical characterization of soft viscoelastic gels via indentation and optimization-based inverse finite element analysis. , 2009, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[42]  G. Marshall,et al.  Nanoindentation of polydimethylsiloxane elastomers: Effect of crosslinking, work of adhesion, and fluid environment on elastic modulus , 2005 .

[43]  Jing Fang,et al.  A method to determine Young’s modulus of soft gels for cell adhesion , 2009 .

[44]  D. Ebenstein.  Nano-JKR force curve method overcomes challenges of surface detection and adhesion for nanoindentation of a compliant polymer in air and water , 2011 .

[45]  R M Hochmuth.  Measuring the mechanical properties of individual human blood cells. , 1993, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[46]  Jessica D. Kaufman,et al.  Time-dependent mechanical characterization of poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) hydrogels using nanoindentation and unconfined compression , 2008, Journal of materials research.

[47]  Michelle L. Oyen,et al.  Viscoelastic and poroelastic mechanical characterization of hydrated gels , 2009 .

[48]  Constance L. Slaboch,et al.  Mechano-rheological properties of the murine thrombus determined via nanoindentation and finite element modeling. , 2012, Journal of The Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials.

[49]  Takeo Matsumoto,et al.  The pipette aspiration applied to the local stiffness measurement of soft tissues , 1997, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[50]  D. Ebenstein,et al.  Eliminating adhesion errors in nanoindentation of compliant polymers and hydrogels. , 2013, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[51]  J. Puskas,et al.  Biomedical application of commercial polymers and novel polyisobutylene-based thermoplastic elastomers for soft tissue replacement. , 2004, Biomacromolecules.

[52]  M. Sato,et al.  Comparison of spinal cord gray matter and white matter softness: measurement by pipette aspiration method. , 2001, Journal of neurosurgery.

[53]  L. Pruitt,et al.  Adhesive forces significantly affect elastic modulus determination of soft polymeric materials in nanoindentation , 2007 .

[54]  Barbara Mazzolai,et al.  Structure and mechanical properties of Octopus vulgaris suckers , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.