One Shot Schemes for Decentralized Quickest Change Detection

This work considers the problem of quickest detection with N distributed sensors that receive sequential observations either in discrete or in continuous time from the environment. These sensors employ cumulative sum (CUSUM) strategies and communicate to a central fusion center by one shot schemes. One shot schemes are schemes in which the sensors communicate with the fusion center only once, via which they signal a detection. The communication is clearly asynchronous and the case is considered in which the fusion center employs a minimal strategy, which means that it declares an alarm when the first communication takes place. It is assumed that the observations received at the sensors are independent and that the time points at which the appearance of a signal can take place are different. Both the cases of the same and different signal distributions across sensors are considered. It is shown that there is no loss of performance of one shot schemes as compared to the centralized case in an extended Lorden min-max sense, since the minimum of N CUSUMs is asymptotically optimal as the mean time between false alarms increases without bound. In the case of different signal distributions the optimal threshold parameters are explicitly computed.

[1]  V. Veeravalli,et al.  Asymptotically Optimal Quickest Change Detection in Distributed Sensor Systems , 2008 .

[2]  Venugopal V. Veeravalli,et al.  Quickest detection of a change process across a sensor array , 2008, 2008 11th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[3]  Maurice Goursat,et al.  Subspace-Based Algorithms for Structural Identification, Damage Detection, and Sensor Data Fusion , 2007, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[4]  Olympia Hadjiliadis,et al.  Optimal and Asymptotically Optimal CUSUM Rules for Change Point Detection in the Brownian Motion Model with Multiple Alternatives , 2006 .

[5]  George V. Moustakides,et al.  Decentralized CUSUM Change Detection , 2006, 2006 9th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[6]  Hongjoong Kim,et al.  Performance of Certain Decentralized Distributed Change Detection Procedures , 2006, 2006 9th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[7]  A. Tartakovsky Asymptotic Performance of a Multichart CUSUM Test Under False Alarm Probability Constraint , 2005, Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[8]  Paul Sas,et al.  Modal Analysis Theory and Testing , 2005 .

[9]  Olympia Hadjiliadis,et al.  Optimal and asymptotically optimal CUSUM rules for change point detection in the Brownian motion model with multiple alternatives@@@Optimal and asymptotically optimal CUSUM rules for change point detection in the Brownian motion model with multiple alternatives , 2005 .

[10]  L. Mevel,et al.  Statistical model-based damage detection and localization: subspace-based residuals and damage-to-noise sensitivity ratios , 2004 .

[11]  Y. Abu-Mostafa,et al.  On the maximum drawdown of a Brownian motion , 2004, Journal of Applied Probability.

[12]  V.V. Veeravalli,et al.  Quickest change detection in distributed sensor systems , 2003, Sixth International Conference of Information Fusion, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[13]  Amir F. Atiya,et al.  The maximum drawdown of the Brownian motion , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering, 2003. Proceedings..

[14]  David J. Ewins,et al.  Modal Testing: Theory, Practice, And Application , 2000 .

[15]  Michèle Basseville,et al.  Subspace-based fault detection algorithms for vibration monitoring , 2000, Autom..

[16]  Venugopal V. Veeravalli,et al.  Multihypothesis sequential probability ratio tests - Part I: Asymptotic optimality , 1999, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[17]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  REFERENCE-BASED STOCHASTIC SUBSPACE IDENTIFICATION FOR OUTPUT-ONLY MODAL ANALYSIS , 1999 .

[18]  Rick S. Blum,et al.  Distributed detection with multiple sensors I. Advanced topics , 1997, Proc. IEEE.

[19]  A. Shiryaev COMMUNICATIONS OF THE MOSCOW MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY: Minimax optimality of the method of cumulative sums (cusum) in the case of continuous time , 1996 .

[20]  M. Beibel A note on Ritov's Bayes approach to the minimax property of the cusum procedure , 1996 .

[21]  V. Veeravalli Decentralized quickest change detection , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.

[22]  Rasul A. Khan Detecting changes in probabilities of a multi—component process , 1995 .

[23]  莊哲男 Applied System Identification , 1994 .

[24]  P. Varshney,et al.  A Decentralized Sequential Test with Data Fusion , 1989, 1989 American Control Conference.

[25]  P. Varshney,et al.  A simple multi-sensor sequential detection procedure , 1988, Proceedings of the 27th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[26]  M. Woodroofe Nonlinear Renewal Theory in Sequential Analysis , 1987 .

[27]  G. Moustakides Optimal stopping times for detecting changes in distributions , 1986 .

[28]  D. Siegmund Sequential Analysis: Tests and Confidence Intervals , 1985 .

[29]  G. Lorden PROCEDURES FOR REACTING TO A CHANGE IN DISTRIBUTION , 1971 .