Adult cancer clinical trials that fail to complete: an epidemic?

The number and diversity of cancer therapeutics in the pipeline has increased over the past decade due to an enhanced understanding of cancer biology and the identification of novel therapeutic targets. At the same time, the cost of bringing new drugs to market and the regulatory burdens associated with clinical drug development have progressively increased. The finite number of eligible patients and limited financial resources available to evaluate promising new therapeutics represent rate-limiting factors in the effort to translate preclinical discoveries into the next generation of standard therapeutic approaches. Optimal use of resources requires understanding and ultimately addressing inefficiencies in the cancer clinical trials system. Prior analyses have demonstrated that a large proportion of trials initiated by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Cooperative Group system are never completed. While NCI Cooperative Group trials are important, they represent only a small proportion of all cancer clinical trials performed. Herein, we explore the problem of cancer clinical trials that fail to complete within the broader cancer clinical trials enterprise. Among 7776 phase II-III adult cancer clinical trials initiated between 2005-2011, we found a seven-year cumulative incidence of failure to complete of approximately 20% (95% confidence interval = 18% to 22%). Nearly 48000 patients were enrolled in trials that failed to complete. These trials likely contribute little to the scientific knowledge base, divert resources and patients from answering other critical questions, and represent a barrier to progress.

[1]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Publication of NIH funded trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: cross sectional analysis , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  B. Freidlin,et al.  Accrual experience of National Cancer Institute Cooperative Group phase III trials activated from 2000 to 2007. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  D. Dilts,et al.  A Sense of Urgency: Evaluating the Link between Clinical Trial Development Time and the Accrual Performance of Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (NCI-CTEP) Sponsored Studies , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[4]  Nicholas C. Ide,et al.  The ClinicalTrials.gov results database--update and key issues. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  R. W. Hansen,et al.  The price of innovation: new estimates of drug development costs. , 2003, Journal of health economics.

[6]  W. McCaskill-Stevens,et al.  The National Cancer Institute-American Society of Clinical Oncology Cancer Trial Accrual Symposium: summary and recommendations. , 2013, Journal of oncology practice.

[7]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Participation in cancer clinical trials: race-, sex-, and age-based disparities. , 2004, JAMA.

[8]  H. Burstein Beaten at the Alamo by the Europeans. , 2011, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[9]  M. Begg,et al.  Strengthening the Career Development of Clinical Translational Scientist Trainees: A Consensus Statement of the Clinical Translational Science Award (CTSA) Research Education and Career Development Committees , 2012, Clinical and translational science.

[10]  Scott D Ramsey,et al.  A national cancer clinical trials system for the 21st century: reinvigorating the NCI Cooperative Group Program. , 2010, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[11]  Kay Dickersin,et al.  The evolution of trial registries and their use to assess the clinical trial enterprise. , 2012, JAMA.

[12]  Moon S. Chen,et al.  Evaluation of factors affecting awareness of and willingness to participate in cancer clinical trials. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  J. DiMasi,et al.  The cost of biopharmaceutical R&D: is biotech different? , 2007 .

[14]  Robert M Califf,et al.  Characteristics of clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, 2007-2010. , 2012, JAMA.

[15]  D. Zarin Factual Errors about ClinicalTrials.gov and Other Federal Mandates in Special Report by Shuster , 2012, Clinical and translational science.

[16]  R. Gray,et al.  Achieving Sufficient Accrual to Address the Primary Endpoint in Phase III Clinical Trials from U.S. Cooperative Oncology Groups , 2011, Clinical Cancer Research.

[17]  D. Dilts,et al.  The Prevalence and Economic Impact of Low-Enrolling Clinical Studies at an Academic Medical Center , 2011, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[18]  D. Gandara,et al.  Prospective evaluation of cancer clinical trial accrual patterns: identifying potential barriers to enrollment. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  S. Ramsey,et al.  Commentary: practicing on the tip of an information iceberg? Evidence of underpublication of registered clinical trials in oncology. , 2008, The oncologist.

[20]  Nicholas C. Ide,et al.  Trial Registration at ClinicalTrials.gov between May and October 2005. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  G. S. Wunderlich,et al.  BOARD ON HEALTH CARE SERVICES , 2013 .

[22]  Paul Mathew,et al.  Department of Defense prostate cancer clinical trials consortium: a new instrument for prostate cancer clinical research. , 2009, Clinical genitourinary cancer.

[23]  Amy P Abernethy,et al.  Characteristics of oncology clinical trials: insights from a systematic analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov. , 2013, JAMA internal medicine.

[24]  L. Perkins,et al.  One Foundation’s Strategy to Accelerate Drug Discovery Through Genomics , 2011, Science Translational Medicine.

[25]  P. Bach Visions of hope in cancer: focus on infrastructure: comment on "characteristics of oncology clinical trials" and "toward accountable cancer care". , 2013, JAMA internal medicine.