Coupled open innovation and innovation performance outcomes: Roles of absorptive capacity

A recent paradigm for firms to solve problems is searching boundary-spanning solutions, a process known as open innovation. Among the different types of open innovation, the coupled approach is the most typical and challenging approach. Based on the organization search theory, this paper aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of coupled open innovation and its relationship with absorptive capacity and innovation outcomes. We ask whether coupled open innovation leads to innovation and how the two dimensions of absorptive capacity - potential and realized absorptive capacity - facilitate this process to increase performance. We employ survey data, annual reports and financial data for 216 Taiwanese high-tech firms to test the research hypotheses. The results show that coupled open innovation is positively associated with incremental performance outcomes but not with radical outcomes. Regarding the role of absorptive capacity, potential absorptive capacity strengthens the positive relationship between coupled open innovation and incremental performance, while realized absorptive capacity strengthens the coupled open innovation- radical performance relationship. This study contributes to organizational search theory by connecting the dynamic capability view of absorptive capacity with open innovation research. Practical implications are also provided.

[1]  David F. Larcker,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics: , 1981 .

[2]  A. Salter,et al.  The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration , 2014 .

[3]  Marta A. Geletkanycz,et al.  Publishing in AMJ–Part 6: Discussing the Implications , 2012 .

[4]  Jin Chen,et al.  The influence of scope, depth, and orientation of external technology sources on the innovative performance of Chinese firms , 2011 .

[5]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  How open innovation can help you cope in lean times. , 2009 .

[6]  O. Gassmann,et al.  Open R&D and Open Innovation: Exploring the Phenomenon , 2009 .

[7]  Chinho Lin,et al.  The alliance innovation performance of R&D alliances—the absorptive capacity perspective , 2012 .

[8]  M. Nieto,et al.  The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation , 2007 .

[9]  Erik Jan Hultink,et al.  External technology acquisition and product innovativeness: The moderating roles of R&D investment and configurational context , 2011 .

[10]  M. Chao,et al.  Internal Resources, External Resources and Environment, and Firm Performance: A Study on Taiwanese Small and Medium Sized Firms , 2012 .

[11]  Wonseok Oh,et al.  Value Cocreation and Wealth Spillover in Open Innovation Alliances , 2012, MIS Q..

[12]  Myriam Cloodt,et al.  Connecting Absorptive Capacity and Open Innovation , 2008 .

[13]  M. Dodgson,et al.  The Role of Technology in the Shift Towards Open Innovation: The Case of Procter & Gamble , 2006 .

[14]  Keld Laursen.  Keep searching and you’ll find: what do we know about variety creation through firms’ search activities for innovation? , 2012 .

[15]  Jian-Hang Wang,et al.  Service Innovation Strategies in Financial Service Industry: The Perspective of Reverse Product Cycle and Innovation Type , 2013 .

[16]  -. Ching,et al.  Exploring the Creativity Performance of Virtual Teams from the Perspectives of Leadership and Creative Personality 王精文 , 2011 .

[17]  B. Looy,et al.  Interorganizational collaboration and innovation: Toward a portfolio approach , 2005 .

[18]  G. Lantos,et al.  Resolving the Capability–Rigidity Paradox in New Product Innovation , 2006 .

[19]  Bart Van Looy,et al.  Technology Alliance Portfolios and Financial Performance: Value-Enhancing and Cost-Increasing Effects of Open Innovation* , 2010 .

[20]  Andreas Mild,et al.  Open innovation modes and the role of internal R&D , 2011 .

[21]  Dhaval Dalal,et al.  Managing platform architectures and manufacturing processes for nonassembled products , 2002 .

[22]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed. , 2009 .

[23]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Managing Potential and Realized Absorptive Capacity: How Do Organizational Antecedents Matter? , 2005 .

[24]  R. Gonzalez.  Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences , 2003 .

[25]  V. Parida,et al.  Inbound Open Innovation Activities in High‐Tech SMEs: The Impact on Innovation Performance , 2012 .

[26]  Araújo,et al.  An Evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[27]  Oliver Gassmann,et al.  Towards a Theory of Open Innovation: Three Core Process Archetypes , 2004 .

[28]  S. Winter.  Understanding dynamic capabilities , 2003 .

[29]  C. Chou,et al.  The impact of open innovation on firm performance: The moderating effects of internal R&D and environmental turbulence , 2013 .

[30]  Chi-Hung Huang,et al.  Open Business Model: An Empirical Study of IC Industry , 2012 .

[31]  B. Looy,et al.  Co-Ownership of Intellectual Property: Exploring the Value-Appropriation and Value-Creation Implications of Co-Patenting with Different Partners , 2013 .

[32]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave , 1995 .

[33]  Heather A. Haveman.  Between a rock and a hard place: Organizational change and performance under conditions of fundamental environmental transformation , 1992 .

[34]  J. Dutton,et al.  The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis , 1986 .

[35]  A. Arora,et al.  Licensing the market for technology , 2003 .

[36]  Paul E. Tesluk,et al.  A Comparison of Approaches to Forming Composite Measures in Structural Equation Models , 2000 .

[37]  Rita Gunther McGrath.  Exploratory Learning, Innovative Capacity, and Managerial Oversight , 2001 .

[38]  Po-Young Chu,et al.  Virtual integration and profitability: some evidence from Taiwan's IC industry , 2005, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[39]  J. Marshall.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2004 .

[40]  J. West,et al.  Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: A Review of Research on Open Innovation , 2013 .

[41]  G. Lynn,et al.  Antecedents and Consequences of Unlearning in New Product Development Teams , 2006 .

[42]  J. Ettlie,et al.  Organization Strategy and Structural Differences for Radical Versus Incremental Innovation , 1984 .

[43]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Beyond High Tech: Early Adopters of Open Innovation in Other Industries , 2006 .

[44]  Manfredi Bruccoleri,et al.  The Effect Of Inbound, Outbound And Coupled Innovation On Performance , 2012 .

[45]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks : Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance , 2007 .

[46]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[47]  David H. Hsu,et al.  When Does Start-Up Innovation Spur the Gale of Creative Destruction? , 2000 .

[48]  D. Teece,et al.  Managing Intellectual Capital: Licensing and Cross-Licensing in Semiconductors and Electronics , 1997 .

[49]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  A Structural Approach to Assessing Innovation: Construct Development of Innovation Locus, Type, and Characteristics , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[50]  Gloria Cuevas Rodríguez,et al.  How social capital and knowledge affect innovation , 2011 .

[51]  Jiann-Chyuan Wang,et al.  A longitudinal examination of performance of two ways on innovation in Taiwan: internal R&D investment and external technology aquisition , 2007, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[52]  J. Schumpeter.  The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle , 1934 .

[53]  H. Chesbrough.  The Era of Open Innovation , 2003 .

[54]  J. Sinacore.  Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions , 1993 .

[55]  T. Devinney,et al.  The Impact of New Product Introductions on the Market Value of Firms , 1993 .

[56]  Laura B. Cardinal,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of the Impact of R&D, Patents, and Product Innovation on Firm Performance , 2010 .

[57]  Malte Brettel,et al.  Giving up Linearity : Absorptive Capacity and Performance , 2011 .

[58]  G. Dosi.  Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation , 1988 .

[59]  B. Kogut,et al.  Exploring internal stickiness : Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 2007 .

[60]  Wim Vanhaverbeke,et al.  The inter-organizational context of open innovation , 2006 .

[61]  A. Arora,et al.  Markets for Technology and Their Implications for Corporate Strategy , 2000 .

[62]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[63]  M. Sawhney,et al.  Collaborating to create: The Internet as a platform for customer engagement in product innovation , 2005 .

[64]  R. Katila,et al.  Something Old, Something New: A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction , 2002 .

[65]  Wim Vanhaverbeke,et al.  Theories of the firm and Open Innovation , 2014 .

[66]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[67]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[68]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[69]  Kuo-Pin Yang,et al.  A Study of the Relationship between the Characteristics of Internationalization Course and Performance: The Degree, Velocity, and Rhythm of Internationalization , 2011 .

[70]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  Market Knowledge Dimensions and Cross-Functional Collaboration: Examining the Different Routes to Product Innovation Performance , 2007 .

[71]  Michael Song,et al.  The role of suppliers in market intelligence gathering for radical and incremental innovation , 2009 .

[72]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .