Computational fluid dynamics simulations of flow and concentration polarization in forward osmosis membrane systems

Abstract Forward osmosis is an osmotically driven membrane separation process that relies on the utilization of a large osmotic pressure differential generated across a semi-permeable membrane. In recent years forward osmosis has shown great promise in the areas of wastewater treatment, seawater/brackish water desalination, and power generation. Previous analytical and experimental investigations have demonstrated how characteristics of typical asymmetric membranes, especially a porous support layer, influence the water flux performance in osmotically driven systems. In order to advance the understanding of membrane systems, models that can accurately encapsulate all significant physical processes occurring in the systems are required. The present study demonstrates a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model capable of simulating forward osmosis systems with asymmetric membranes. The model is inspired by previously published CFD models for pressure-driven systems and the general analytical theory for flux modeling in asymmetric membranes. Simulations reveal a non-negligible external concentration polarization on the porous support, even when accounting for high cross-flow velocity and slip velocity at the porous surface. Results confirm that the common assumption of insignificant external concentration polarization on the porous surface of asymmetric membranes used in current semi-analytical approaches may not be generally valid in realistic systems under certain conditions; specifically in systems without mass-transfer promoting spacers and low cross-flow velocities.

[1]  S. Loeb,et al.  Effect of porous support fabric on osmosis through a Loeb-Sourirajan type asymmetric membrane , 1997 .

[2]  S. Sablani,et al.  Fouling of Reverse Osmosis and Ultrafiltration Membranes: A Critical Review , 2005 .

[3]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  The forward osmosis membrane bioreactor: A low fouling alternative to MBR processes , 2009 .

[4]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Energy requirements of ammonia-carbon dioxide forward osmosis desalination , 2007 .

[5]  Vítor Geraldes,et al.  Flow and mass transfer modelling of nanofiltration , 2001 .

[6]  David F. Fletcher,et al.  Computational fluid dynamics modelling of flow and permeation for pressure-driven membrane processes , 2002 .

[7]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments , 2006 .

[8]  Dianne E. Wiley,et al.  Effects of natural convection instability on membrane performance in dead-end and cross-flow ultrafiltration , 1996 .

[9]  E. Mosina.  Numerical study of flow at a liquid-porous medium interface , 2010 .

[10]  Anthony G Fane,et al.  Direct microscopic observation of forward osmosis membrane fouling. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  J. E. Glynn,et al.  Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[12]  R. Baker.  Membrane Technology and Applications , 1999 .

[13]  P. L. T. Brian,et al.  Concentration Polar zation in Reverse Osmosis Desalination with Variable Flux and Incomplete Salt Rejection , 1965 .

[14]  Boundary conditions at the interface between fluid layer and fibrous medium , 2009 .

[15]  Dianne E. Wiley,et al.  Review of 3D CFD modeling of flow and mass transfer in narrow spacer-filled channels in membrane modules , 2010 .

[16]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Comparison of fouling behavior in forward osmosis (FO) and reverse osmosis (RO) , 2010 .

[17]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Organic fouling of forward osmosis membranes: Fouling reversibility and cleaning without chemical reagents , 2010 .

[18]  David F. Fletcher,et al.  A computational fluids dynamics study of buoyancy effects in reverse osmosis , 2004 .

[19]  Tzahi Y Cath,et al.  Forward osmosis for concentration of anaerobic digester centrate. , 2007, Water research.

[20]  H. Yeh,et al.  Analysis of the slip effect on the permeate flux in membrane ultrafiltration , 1999 .

[21]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Influence of Crossflow Membrane Filter Geometry and Shear Rate on Colloidal Fouling in Reverse Osmosis and Nanofiltration Separations , 2002 .

[22]  P. Roache.  QUANTIFICATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS , 1997 .

[23]  Rong Wang,et al.  Modeling salt accumulation in osmotic membrane bioreactors: Implications for FO membrane selection a , 2011 .

[24]  David F. Fletcher,et al.  Techniques for computational fluid dynamics modelling of flow in membrane channels , 2003 .

[25]  Mark R. Wiesner,et al.  Slip at a uniformly porous boundary: effect on fluid flow and mass transfer , 1992 .

[26]  R. Baker,et al.  Membranes for power generation by pressure-retarded osmosis , 1981 .

[27]  Andrew L. Zydney,et al.  Stagnant film model for concentration polarization in membrane systems , 1997 .

[28]  Herve Morvan,et al.  CFD simulations of flow and concentration polarization in spacer-filled channels for application to water desalination , 2008 .

[29]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Coupled effects of internal concentration polarization and fouling on flux behavior of forward osmosis membranes during humic acid filtration , 2010 .

[30]  A. Gosman,et al.  Solution of the implicitly discretised reacting flow equations by operator-splitting , 1986 .

[31]  Eric M.V. Hoek,et al.  Modeling concentration polarization in reverse osmosis processes , 2005 .

[32]  J. McCutcheon,et al.  Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis , 2006 .

[33]  J. Bear.  Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media , 1975 .

[34]  C. Nielsen.  Biomimetic membranes for sensor and separation applications , 2009, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[35]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  High performance thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[36]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Modeling water flux in forward osmosis: Implications for improved membrane design , 2007 .