When your gain is also my gain. A class of strategic models with other-regarding agents

Abstract This paper explores the role of social preferences in a competitive framework. More precisely, we study other-regarding strategic models where agents show Rawlsian preferences and, therefore, they care about the best interest of the worst-off agent. The representation of preferences proposed is the most appropriate when the utilities of the agents are vector-valued and their components are not compensable but complementary. In these cases, the improvement of the result for each agent has to be reached by simultaneously improving all the components of the vector-valued utility. Depending on the attitude exhibited by the agents with respect to the results of the others, we distinguish different types of agents and relate them with the parameters of the Rawlsian preference function. An analysis of the sets of equilibria in terms of these parameters is presented. Particularly, in the case of two agents, the equilibria for all the values of the parameters are completely described.

[1]  M. A. Caraballo,et al.  Agents with Other‐Regarding Preferences in the Commons , 2017 .

[2]  Michael M. Kostreva,et al.  Some existence theorems of Nash and Berge Equilibria , 2004, Appl. Math. Lett..

[3]  C. Kolstad Public Goods Agreements with Other-Regarding Preferences , 2011 .

[4]  Martin Strobel,et al.  Inequality Aversion, Efficiency, and Maximin Preferences in Simple Distribution Experiments , 2002 .

[5]  David M. Kreps,et al.  Quantity Precommitment and Bertrand Competition Yield Cournot Outcomes , 1983 .

[6]  J. Kagel,et al.  Other Regarding Preferences: A Selective Survey of Experimental Results , 2012 .

[7]  Michael M. Kostreva,et al.  Berge equilibrium: some recent results from fixed-point theorems , 2005, Appl. Math. Comput..

[8]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[9]  M. A. Caraballo,et al.  A Maxmin Approach for the Equilibria of Vector-Valued Games , 2018, Group Decision and Negotiation.

[10]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[11]  T. W. Körner,et al.  Mutual support in games: Some properties of Berge equilibria , 2011 .

[12]  M. Nowak Five Rules for the Evolution of Cooperation , 2006, Science.

[13]  Matthew D. Lieberman,et al.  The Sunny Side of Fairness , 2008, Psychological science.

[14]  Yann Rébillé Representations of preferences with pseudolinear utility functions , 2019, Journal of Mathematical Psychology.

[15]  M. Rabin,et al.  Understanding Social Preference with Simple Tests , 2001 .

[16]  J. Nash,et al.  NON-COOPERATIVE GAMES , 1951, Classics in Game Theory.

[17]  M. A. Caraballo,et al.  Equilibria with vector-valued utilities and preference information. The analysis of a mixed duopoly , 2017 .