Surgeon and Type of Anesthesia Predict Variability in Surgical Procedure Times

Background Variability in surgical procedure times increases the cost of healthcare delivery by increasing both the underutilization and overutilization of expensive surgical resources. To reduce variability in surgical procedure times, we must identify and study its sources. Methods Our data set consisted of all surgeries performed over a 7-yr period at a large teaching hospital, resulting in 46,322 surgical cases. To study factors associated with variability in surgical procedure times, data mining techniques were used to segment and focus the data so that the analyses would be both technically and intellectually feasible. The data were subdivided into 40 representative segments of manageable size and variability based on headers adopted from the common procedural terminology classification. Each data segment was then analyzed using a main-effects linear model to identify and quantify specific sources of variability in surgical procedure times. Results The single most important source of variability in surgical procedure times was surgeon effect. Type of anesthesia, age, gender, and American Society of Anesthesiologists risk class were additional sources of variability. Intrinsic case-specific variability, unexplained by any of the preceding factors, was found to be highest for shorter surgeries relative to longer procedures. Variability in procedure times among surgeons was a multiplicative function (proportionate to time) of surgical time and total procedure time, such that as procedure times increased, variability in surgeons’ surgical time increased proportionately. Conclusions Surgeon-specific variability should be considered when building scheduling heuristics for longer surgeries. Results concerning variability in surgical procedure times due to factors such as type of anesthesia, age, gender, and American Society of Anesthesiologists risk class may be extrapolated to scheduling in other institutions, although specifics on individual surgeons may not. This research identifies factors associated with variability in surgical procedure times, knowledge of which may ultimately be used to improve surgical scheduling and operating room utilization.

[1]  C. Rossiter,et al.  Automatic Monitoring of the Time Waited in Out-patient Departments , 1963 .

[2]  H. Wolfe,et al.  Scheduling a multiple operating room system: a simulation approach. , 1968, Health services research.

[3]  J Goldman,et al.  An evaluation of operating room scheduling policies. , 1969, The Hospital manager.

[4]  J Goldman,et al.  A study of the variability of surgical estimates. , 1970, Hospital management.

[5]  J. B. Martin,et al.  Surgical demand scheduling: a review. , 1978, Health services research.

[6]  D G McQuarrie.  Limits to efficient operating room scheduling. Lessons from computer-use models. , 1981, Archives of surgery.

[7]  G Bashein,et al.  A Comprehensive Computer System for Anesthetic Record Retrieval , 1985, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[8]  Edward A. Silver,et al.  Scheduling in a Management Context: Uncertain Processing Times and Non‐Regular Performance Measures* , 1993 .

[9]  Monitoring the cost-effective use of operating theatres. , 1994, Nursing RSA = Verpleging RSA.

[10]  Monitoring the cost-effective use of operating theatres. , 1994 .

[11]  F. Dexter.  Application of prediction levels to OR scheduling. , 1996, AORN journal.

[12]  Padhraic Smyth,et al.  From Data Mining to Knowledge Discovery in Databases , 1996, AI Mag..

[13]  W. Weaver,et al.  Length of hospital stay after acute myocardial infarction in the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention (MITI) Project registry. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  C. Kooperberg,et al.  Statistical Modeling to Predict Elective Surgery Time: Comparison with a Computer Scheduling System and Surgeon-provided Estimates , 1996, Anesthesiology.

[15]  George H. John.  Enhancements to the data mining process , 1997 .

[16]  Jerrold H. May,et al.  SURGICAL PROCEDURE TIMES ARE WELL MODELED BY THE LOGNORMAL DISTRIBUTION , 1998 .

[17]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  Surgical subspecialty block utilization and capacity planning: a minimal cost analysis model. , 1999, Anesthesiology.

[18]  Jerrold H. May,et al.  INDIVIDUAL SURGEON VARIABILITY IS A MULTIPLICATIVE FUNCTION OF SURGICAL TIME , 1999 .

[19]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  Modeling the Uncertainty of Surgical Procedure Times: Comparison of Log-normal and Normal Models , 2000, Anesthesiology.