Quantitative structure‐activity relationships for predicting mutagenicity and carcinogenicity

Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) for predicting mutagenicity and carcinogenicity were reviewed. The QSARs for predicting mutagenicity and carcinogenicity have been mostly limited to specific classes of chemicals (e.g., aromatic amines and heteroaromatic nitro chemicals). The motivation to develop QSARs for predicting mutagenicity and carcinogenicity to screen inventories of chemicals has produced four major commercially available computerized systems that are able to predict these endpoints: Deductive estimation of risk from existing knowledge (DEREK) toxicity prediction by komputer assisted technology (TOPKAT), computer automated structure evaluation (CASE), and multiple computer automated structure evaluation (Multicase). A brief overview of these and some other expert systems for predicting mutagenicity and carcinogenicity is provided. The other expert systems for predicting mutagenicity and carcinogenicity include automatic data analysis using pattern recognition techniques (ADAPT), QSAR Expert System (QSAR-ES), OncoLogic computer optimized molecular parametric analysis of chemical toxicity system (COMPACT), and common reactivity pattern (COREPA).

[1]  A. Debnath,et al.  Quantitative structure‐activity relationship investigation of the role of hydrophobicity in regulating mutagenicity in the Ames test: 2. Mutagenicity of aromatic and heteroaromatic nitro compounds in Salmonella typhimurium TA100 , 1992, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[2]  M Nakadate Toxicity prediction of chemicals based on structure-activity relationships. , 1998, Toxicology letters.

[3]  J. Ashby,et al.  The influence of chemical structure on the extent and sites of carcinogenesis for 522 rodent carcinogens and 55 different human carcinogen exposures. , 1993, Mutation research.

[4]  Gerald T. Ankley,et al.  A Computationally-Based Hazard Identification Algorithm That Incorporates Ligand Flexibility. 1. Identification of Potential Androgen Receptor Ligands , 1997 .

[5]  R Benigni,et al.  Prediction of rodent carcinogenicity of aromatic amines: a quantitative structure-activity relationships model. , 2001, Carcinogenesis.

[6]  R Benigni,et al.  QSARS of mutagens and carcinogens: two case studies illustrating problems in the construction of models for noncongeneric chemicals. , 1996, Mutation research.

[7]  E Benfenati,et al.  Computational predictive programs (expert systems) in toxicology. , 1997, Toxicology.

[8]  J. Contrera,et al.  A new highly specific method for predicting the carcinogenic potential of pharmaceuticals in rodents using enhanced MCASE QSAR-ES software. , 1998, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[9]  C Hansch,et al.  Mutagenicity of substituted (o-phenylenediamine)platinum dichloride in the Ames test. A quantitative structure-activity analysis. , 1980, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[10]  C. Hansch,et al.  p-σ-π Analysis. A Method for the Correlation of Biological Activity and Chemical Structure , 1964 .

[11]  G. Klopman Artificial intelligence approach to structure-activity studies. Computer automated structure evaluation of biological activity of organic molecules , 1985 .

[12]  Alan R. Katritzky,et al.  A COMPREHENSIVE QSAR TREATMENT OF THE GENOTOXICITY OF HETEROAROMATIC AND AROMATIC AMINES , 1999 .

[13]  M J Prival,et al.  Evaluation of the TOPKAT system for predicting the carcinogenicity of chemicals , 2001, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[14]  Mark T. D. Cronin,et al.  QSAR in Toxicology. 4. Prediction of Non‐lethal Mammalian Toxicological Endpoints, and Expert Systems for Toxicity Prediction , 1995 .

[15]  R Benigni,et al.  Profiles of chemically-induced tumors in rodents: quantitative relationships. , 1998, Mutation research.

[16]  R. Tennant,et al.  Chemical structure, Salmonella mutagenicity and extent of carcinogenicity as indicators of genotoxic carcinogenesis among 222 chemicals tested in rodents by the U.S. NCI/NTP. , 1988, Mutation research.

[17]  Ferenc Darvas,et al.  HazardExpert: An Expert System for Predicting Chemical Toxicity , 1992 .

[18]  A. Debnath,et al.  A QSAR investigation of the role of hydrophobicity in regulating mutagenicity in the ames test: 1. Mutagenicity of aromatic and heteroaromatic amines in Salmonella typhimurium TA98 and TA100 , 1992, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[19]  D. Sanderson,et al.  Computer Prediction of Possible Toxic Action from Chemical Structure; The DEREK System , 1991, Human & experimental toxicology.

[20]  H S Rosenkranz,et al.  The structural basis of the genotoxicity of nitroarenofurans and related compounds. , 1994, Mutation research.

[21]  C. Wei,et al.  Mutagenicity studies of benzidine and its analogs: structure-activity relationships. , 2000, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[22]  J. Ashby,et al.  Prediction of Salmonella mutagenicity. , 1996, Mutagenesis.

[23]  S C Basak,et al.  Predicting mutagenicity of chemicals using topological and quantum chemical parameters: a similarity based study. , 1995, Chemosphere.

[24]  A. Debnath,et al.  Mutagenicity of quinolines in Salmonella typhimurium TA100. A QSAR study based on hydrophobicity and molecular orbital determinants. , 1992, Mutation research.

[25]  G P Ford,et al.  Relative stabilities of nitrenium ions derived from heterocyclic amine food carcinogens: relationship to mutagenicity. , 1992, Chemico-biological interactions.

[26]  J Ashby,et al.  International Commission for Protection Against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. Two million rodent carcinogens? The role of SAR and QSAR in their detection. , 1994, Mutation research.

[27]  Worth Andrew,et al.  The Development and Validation of Expert Systems for Predicting Toxicity. , 1998 .

[28]  O. Mekenyan,et al.  Development and validation of an average mammalian estrogen receptor-based QSAR model , 2002, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[29]  H S Rosenkranz,et al.  International Commission for Protection Against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. Approaches to SAR in carcinogenesis and mutagenesis. Prediction of carcinogenicity/mutagenicity using MULTI-CASE. , 1994, Mutation research.

[30]  M S Legator,et al.  Aromatic amines and acetamides in Salmonella typhimurium TA98 and TA100: a quantitative structure-activity relation study. , 1989, Molecular toxicology.

[31]  R. W. Morgan,et al.  Quantitative structure‐activity relationships of heterocyclic amine mutagens formed during the cooking of food , 1991, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[32]  Gerald T. Ankley,et al.  New developments in a hazard identification algorithm for hormone receptor ligands , 1999 .

[33]  L. Bernstein,et al.  Target organs in chronic bioassays of 533 chemical carcinogens. , 1991, Environmental health perspectives.

[34]  G P Ford,et al.  Relative stabilities of nitrenium ions derived from polycyclic aromatic amines. Relationship to mutagenicity. , 1992, Chemico-biological interactions.

[35]  L D Claxton,et al.  Computer-assisted structure-activity relationships of nitrogenous cyclic compounds tested in salmonella assays for mutagenicity. , 1987, Mutation research.

[36]  L Zhang,et al.  The structure-activity relationship of skin carcinogenicity of aromatic hydrocarbons and heterocycles. , 1992, Chemico-biological interactions.

[37]  R Benigni,et al.  QSAR models for discriminating between mutagenic and nonmutagenic aromatic and heteroaromatic amines , 1998, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[38]  P. Jurs,et al.  Computer-assisted structure-activity studies of chemical carcinogens. Aromatic amines. , 1981, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[39]  C. Ioannides,et al.  A combined COMPACT and HazardExpert study of 40 chemicals for which information on mutagenicity and carcinogenicity is known, including the results of human epidemiological studies , 1998, Human and Experimental Toxicology.

[40]  R Benigni,et al.  QSAR models for both mutagenic potency and activity: Application to nitroarenes and aromatic amines , 1994, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[41]  B H Margolin,et al.  Prediction of chemical carcinogenicity in rodents from in vitro genetic toxicity assays. , 1987, Science.

[42]  Ovanes Mekenyan,et al.  Identification of the structural requirements for mutagenicity by incorporating molecular flexibility and metabolic activation of chemicals I: TA100 model. , 2004, Chemical research in toxicology.

[43]  R Benigni,et al.  Quantitative structure-activity relationships of mutagenic and carcinogenic aromatic amines. , 2000, Chemical reviews.

[44]  Gilles Klopman,et al.  Structural basis of the mutagenicity of heterocyclic amines formed during the cooking processes , 1993, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.