Planning Margins to CTV for Image-Guided Whole Pelvis Prostate Cancer Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy

Purpose: We investigated the margin recipes with different alignment techniques in the image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) of whole pelvis prostate cancer patients. Materials and Methods: Forty-eight computed tomography (CT) scans of eight prostate cancer patients were investigated. Each patient had an initial planning CT scan and 5 consecutive serial CT scans during the course of treatment, all of which were acquired using 3 mm slice separation and 0.94 mm resolution in the axial plane at 120 kVp, on a PQ 5000 CT scanner. Three different whole pelvis planning margin recipes, ranging from 3 to 13 mm, were investigated. A unique IMRT plan was created with each PTV on the initial CT scan, and was then registered to the 5 serial CT scans, by bony alignment or by prostate gland-based alignment. The dose computed on each serial CT scans was accumulated back to the initial CT scan using deformable image registration for final dosimetric evaluation of the interplay of the margin selection and alignment methods. Results: Bony alignment and prostate gland-based alignment gave very similar result to the pelvic lymphatic nodes (PLNs), regardless of its margin around. The prostate gland-based alignment greatly enhanced the coverage to the prostate and SV, especially with small margins. Meanwhile, the soft-tissue alignment also raised the incidental dose to the rectum and reduces the dose to the bladder. With small to intermediate margins, only soft-tissue alignment gave acceptable mean coverage to SV. Margin of 13mm or more was needed for PLNs to maintain good target coverage. Conclusion: We commend prostate-based alignment along with margins less than or equal to 5mm around prostate and SV, and margins greater than or equal to 13 mm around the vascular spaces.

[1]  F. Freiha,et al.  Evaluation of extended-field radiotherapy for prostatic neoplasm: 1976 progress report. , 1977, Cancer treatment reports.

[2]  O. Odland,et al.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy of pelvic lymph nodes in locally advanced prostate cancer: planning procedures and early experiences. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  I. Hsu,et al.  Proposed rectal dose constraints for patients undergoing definitive whole pelvic radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  Sylvie Chabaud,et al.  Is there a role for pelvic irradiation in localized prostate adenocarcinoma? Preliminary results of GETUG-01. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  G. Sanguineti,et al.  Acute toxicity of whole-pelvis IMRT in 87 patients with localized prostate cancer , 2008, Acta oncologica.

[6]  Di Yan,et al.  Comparison of various online IGRT strategies: The benefits of online treatment plan re-optimization. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[7]  Charles R. Thomas,et al.  An update of the phase III trial comparing whole pelvic to prostate only radiotherapy and neoadjuvant to adjuvant total androgen suppression: updated analysis of RTOG 94-13, with emphasis on unexpected hormone/radiation interactions. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  Rajat J Kudchadker,et al.  Changes in the pelvic anatomy after an IMRT treatment fraction of prostate cancer. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  Todd Pawlicki,et al.  A study of image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy with fiducials for localized prostate cancer including pelvic lymph nodes. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  M. Zelefsky,et al.  Whole pelvic radiotherapy for prostate cancer using 3D conformal and intensity-modulated radiotherapy. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  J. Buatti,et al.  Analysis of interfraction prostate motion using megavoltage cone beam computed tomography. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  J A Antolak,et al.  Prostate target volume variations during a course of radiotherapy. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  J. Rice Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis , 1988 .

[14]  C. Moore,et al.  Rectal motion can reduce CTV coverage and increase rectal dose during prostate radiotherapy: A daily cone-beam CT study. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[15]  R. Peschel,et al.  Whole pelvic radiotherapy versus prostate only radiotherapy in the management of locally advanced or aggressive prostate adenocarcinoma. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  Chandra Burman,et al.  Three Dimensional Expansion of Margins for Single-fraction Treatments: Stereotactic Radiosurgery Brain Cases , 2012 .

[17]  C. Ma,et al.  Dosimetry and preliminary acute toxicity in the first 100 men treated for prostate cancer on a randomized hypofractionation dose escalation trial. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  W. Sause,et al.  Elective pelvic irradiation in stage A2, B carcinoma of the prostate: analysis of RTOG 77-06. , 1988, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  Cedric X. Yu,et al.  Role of image-guided patient repositioning and online planning in localized prostate cancer IMRT. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[20]  P. Xia,et al.  Does image-guided radiotherapy improve toxicity profile in whole pelvic-treated high-risk prostate cancer? Comparison between IG-IMRT and IMRT. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  Cedric X. Yu,et al.  Dosimetric effects of the prone and supine positions on image guided localized prostate cancer radiotherapy. , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[22]  Vladimir Pekar,et al.  Assessment of a model-based deformable image registration approach for radiation therapy planning. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  Joseph A. Smith,et al.  Phase III trial comparing whole-pelvic versus prostate-only radiotherapy and neoadjuvant versus adjuvant combined androgen suppression: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9413 , 2003 .

[24]  R. Reznek,et al.  Mapping pelvic lymph nodes: guidelines for delineation in intensity-modulated radiotherapy. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.