Ultrasonic Attenuation and Backscatter Coefficient Estimates of Rodent-Tumor-Mimicking Structures: Comparison of Results among Clinical Scanners

In vivo estimations of the frequency-dependent acoustic attenuation (α) and backscatter (η) coefficients using radiofrequency (rf) echoes acquired with clinical ultrasound systems must be independent of the data acquisition setup and the estimation procedures. In a recent in vivo assessment of these parameters in rodent mammary tumors, overall agreement was observed among α and η estimates using data from four clinical imaging systems. In some cases, particularly in highly-attenuating heterogeneous tumors, multisystem variability was observed. This paper compares α and η estimates of a well-characterized rodent-tumor-mimicking homogeneous phantom scanned using seven transducers with the same four clinical imaging systems: a Siemens Acuson S2000, an Ultrasonix RP, a Zonare Z.one and a VisualSonics Vevo2100. α and η estimates of lesion-mimicking spheres in the phantom were independently assessed by three research groups, who analyzed their system's rf echo signals. Imaging-system-based estimates of α and η of both lesion-mimicking spheres were comparable to through-transmission laboratory estimates and to predictions using Faran's theory, respectively. A few notable variations in results among the clinical systems were observed but the average and maximum percent difference between α estimates and laboratory-assessed values was 11% and 29%, respectively. Excluding a single outlier dataset, the average and maximum average difference between η estimates for the clinical systems and values predicted from scattering theory was 16% and 33%, respectively. These results were an improvement over previous interlaboratory comparisons of attenuation and backscatter estimates. Although the standardization of our estimation methodologies can be further improved, this study validates our results from previous rodent breast-tumor model studies.

[1]  T J Hall,et al.  Identifying acoustic scattering sources in normal renal parenchyma from the anisotropy in acoustic properties. , 1991, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[2]  William D O'Brien,et al.  Parametric Imaging of Rat Mammary Tumors In Vivo for the Purposes of Tissue Characterization , 2002, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[3]  Tomy Varghese,et al.  Hybrid spectral domain method for attenuation slope estimation. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[4]  T J Hall,et al.  Identifying acoustic scattering sources in normal renal parenchyma in vivo by varying arterial and ureteral pressures. , 1992, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[5]  Yassin Labyed,et al.  Cross‐Imaging Platform Comparison of Ultrasonic Backscatter Coefficient Measurements of Live Rat Tumors , 2010, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[6]  L Li,et al.  [Quantitative backscatter imaging]. , 1999, Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi.

[7]  Tomy Varghese,et al.  Initial Clinical Experience Imaging Scatterer Size and Strain in Thyroid Nodules , 2006, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[8]  E. Madsen,et al.  Tests of backscatter coefficient measurement using broadband pulses , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[9]  C R Hill,et al.  The use of angular acoustic scattering measurements to estimate structural parameters of human and animal tissues. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  T. Varghese,et al.  Statistics of ultrasonic scatterer size estimation with a reference phantom. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Robert C. Waag,et al.  Measurements of calf liver ultrasonic differential and total scattering cross sections , 1984 .

[12]  D. Nicholas,et al.  EVALUATION OF BACKSCATTERING COEFFICIENTS FOR EXCISED HUMAN TISSUES: RESULTS, INTERPRETATION AND ASSOCIATED MEASUREMENTS , 1982 .

[13]  Timothy A Bigelow,et al.  Estimation of total attenuation and scatterer size from backscattered ultrasound waveforms. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  J M Kofler,et al.  Improved method for determining resolution zones in ultrasound phantoms with spherical simulated lesions. , 2001, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[15]  E. Feleppa,et al.  Relationship of Ultrasonic Spectral Parameters to Features of Tissue Microstructure , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[16]  James A. Zagzebski,et al.  A Method for in Vitro Mapping of Ultrasonic Speed and Density in Breast Tissue , 1991, Ultrasonic imaging.

[17]  T J Hall,et al.  Parametric Ultrasound Imaging from Backscatter Coefficient Measurements: Image Formation and Interpretation , 1990, Ultrasonic imaging.

[18]  F. Dunn,et al.  Ultrasonic Scattering in Biological Tissues , 1992 .

[19]  M. Oelze,et al.  Advanced Ultrasonic Imaging Techniques for Breast Cancer Research 1 , 2005 .

[20]  James A. Zagzebski,et al.  Essentials Of Ultrasound Physics , 1996 .

[21]  L. X. Yao,et al.  Backscatter Coefficient Measurements Using a Reference Phantom to Extract Depth-Dependent Instrumentation Factors , 1990, Ultrasonic imaging.

[22]  E J Feleppa,et al.  Comparison of theoretical scattering results and ultrasonic data from clinical liver examinations. , 1988, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[23]  Jonathan Mamou,et al.  Identifying ultrasonic scattering sites from three-dimensional impedance maps. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  J. Faran Sound Scattering by Solid Cylinders and Spheres , 1951 .

[25]  E. Madsen,et al.  Tissue mimicking materials for ultrasound phantoms. , 1978, Medical physics.

[26]  F. Foster,et al.  Ultrasonic characterization of selected renal tissues. , 1989, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[27]  E. Madsen,et al.  Interlaboratory Comparison of Ultrasonic Backscatter Coefficient Measurements From 2 to 9 MHz , 2005, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[28]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Describing small-scale structure in random media using pulse-echo ultrasound. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.